Softwr
LabArchives logo

LabArchives

Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention

As of 31 August 2026, LabArchives has a free plan and paid plans start at $330/year. LabArchives replaces the paper lab notebook with a versioned, timestamped, signable record designed to survive an audit or a patent dispute. Softwr lists it under Research. LabArchives is made by LabArchives (Dotmatics), available on Web, iOS, Android.

Overview

What LabArchives does

LabArchives is a browser-based electronic lab notebook. Entries are versioned so no edit destroys the prior state, every change is timestamped and attributed, and pages can be signed and countersigned by a witness. Beyond the notebook there are separate Inventory and Scheduler products for sample tracking and shared instrument booking, and an Education edition used for teaching laboratory courses. What sets it apart commercially is fit with universities. It sells institution-wide site licences to research offices, integrates with single sign-on and the campus learning management system, and its retention model assumes records must outlive the postdoc who created them, which is exactly the problem a departing researcher's laptop creates. It is also one of very few ELN vendors that publishes list prices at all: at the time of writing, Professional is listed at $330 academic or $575 corporate per user per year, with an ELN plus Inventory bundle at $360 academic or $675 corporate. Buyers are academic research groups, core facilities and small biotech companies. The ownership fact matters: LabArchives is part of Dotmatics, itself part of a much larger scientific software portfolio, so it is one line in a roadmap that increasingly favours enterprise pharmaceutical customers. Labs choosing it for its academic pricing should watch what happens to that pricing over a renewal cycle or two.

What people use it for

  • A university group that must keep research records after a PhD student leaves, rather than losing them with a laptop
  • A core facility that needs instrument booking and a shared record of who ran what and when
  • A small biotech building patent-defensible evidence of invention with witnessed, timestamped entries
  • A teaching department running undergraduate laboratory courses where instructors need to see and grade notebook work

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about LabArchives.

  • The corporate rate is roughly 75 per cent above the academic rate for the same product, so a university spinout crossing into commercial status faces a step change in cost at exactly the point its budget is tightest.
  • Inventory and Scheduler are separate per-user line items, so a lab that assumed one price per person for a working system ends up paying two or three.
  • It is now a Dotmatics product inside a large scientific software portfolio, which puts roadmap priority with enterprise pharmaceutical buyers rather than with the academic labs that made it popular.
  • The interface is functional rather than pleasant, and adoption typically fails not on features but on researchers quietly continuing to keep notes elsewhere; you need a mandate, not a rollout email.
  • Instrument integration is thin compared with dedicated laboratory information management systems, so automated capture from analytical equipment usually still means manual upload or custom scripting.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of LabArchives

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • LabArchives logo
    LabArchives
    vs
    Jupyter logo
    Jupyter

    Jupyter: If your records are computational rather than wet-lab and a versioned notebook in Git meets your retention needs

  • LabArchives logo
    LabArchives
    vs
    Box logo
    Box

    Box: If the requirement is only shared, retained file storage for a group rather than a witnessed experimental record

  • LabArchives logo
    LabArchives
    vs
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Microsoft OneDrive

    Microsoft OneDrive: If your institution already mandates it and you can accept file versioning without signing or witnessing

Pricing

What LabArchives costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Free

Free

  • Limited storage
  • Core notebook and versioning
  • Intended for evaluation and individual use

Professional (Academic)

$330 /yr

  • Full ELN with witnessing and signing
  • Academic rate per user per year
  • Corporate rate is $575 per user per year

ELN plus Inventory bundle

$360 /yr

  • Notebook plus sample and reagent inventory
  • Academic rate; corporate rate is $675 per user per year

Inventory standalone

$99 /yr

  • Sample tracking without the notebook
  • Academic rate; corporate rate is $199 per user per year

Scheduler

$35 /yr

  • Instrument and facility booking
  • Academic rate; corporate rate is $105 per user per year

Capabilities

Features

  • Versioned entries

    Every revision is retained and attributed; nothing is overwritten

  • Witnessing and signing

    Page-level electronic signature and countersignature for patent and audit evidence

  • Inventory

    Sample, reagent and freezer location tracking, sold as a separate per-user product

  • Scheduler

    Booking for shared instruments and facilities, priced separately again

  • Education edition

    Structured lab course notebooks with instructor grading views

  • Single sign-on

    Institutional identity integration for campus-wide deployment

  • Structured data entry

    Templates and widgets so protocol results are captured as fields rather than free text

  • DOI and repository publishing

    Export of notebook pages for citation and long-term archiving

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Does LabArchives satisfy patent evidence requirements?

Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.

Who owns LabArchives?

Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.

Is there really a free tier?

Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.

Can we export everything if we leave?

Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from LabArchives

Best Research software for

Compare LabArchives with

Other Research software

  • Electronic investigator site file and eRegulatory binder for clinical research sites

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Research informatics group behind GraphPad Prism, SnapGene, Geneious and LabArchives, now owned by Siemens

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Electronic lab notebook, LIMS and inventory in one system, now sold under the Cenevo group

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • R&D cloud for biotechnology research and molecular biology

    Free plan13 researched notes
  • Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management

    Pricing on request13 researched notes
  • Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability

    Pricing on request13 researched notes
  • No-code lab operating system combining LIMS, ELN and inventory for biotech teams

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Scientific data cloud that harmonises instrument output across the lab estate

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing

    From $999/yr12 researched notes
  • The AI research assistant

    Free, then $49/mo9 researched notes
  • Enterprise LIMS for regulated QC laboratories, with LES and SDMS in one product

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Automated consumer insights platform for testing advertising, product concepts and brand health

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Collect, organize, annotate, cite and share your research

    Free, then $20/yr9 researched notes
  • Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Scientific data cloud that harmonises instrument output across the lab estate

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing

    From $999/yr12 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for LabArchives, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on LabArchives

Best Research software alternatives

Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management

quote

R&D cloud for biotechnology research and molecular biology

Free for academics, quoted for organisations

UX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later

Flat monthly fee, unlimited users

Cheminformatics toolkits and structure handling, now a Certara subsidiary

quote

Laboratory information management from Abbott for regulated and public health labs

quote

Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors

quote

Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability

quote

Enterprise laboratory information management system for regulated labs

quote

Compare LabArchives with alternatives