LabArchivesvs
Jupyter


Jupyter: If your records are computational rather than wet-lab and a versioned notebook in Git meets your retention needs

Electronic lab notebook with witnessing, version history and long-term institutional retention
As of 31 August 2026, LabArchives has a free plan and paid plans start at $330/year. LabArchives replaces the paper lab notebook with a versioned, timestamped, signable record designed to survive an audit or a patent dispute. Softwr lists it under Research. LabArchives is made by LabArchives (Dotmatics), available on Web, iOS, Android.
Overview
LabArchives is a browser-based electronic lab notebook. Entries are versioned so no edit destroys the prior state, every change is timestamped and attributed, and pages can be signed and countersigned by a witness. Beyond the notebook there are separate Inventory and Scheduler products for sample tracking and shared instrument booking, and an Education edition used for teaching laboratory courses. What sets it apart commercially is fit with universities. It sells institution-wide site licences to research offices, integrates with single sign-on and the campus learning management system, and its retention model assumes records must outlive the postdoc who created them, which is exactly the problem a departing researcher's laptop creates. It is also one of very few ELN vendors that publishes list prices at all: at the time of writing, Professional is listed at $330 academic or $575 corporate per user per year, with an ELN plus Inventory bundle at $360 academic or $675 corporate. Buyers are academic research groups, core facilities and small biotech companies. The ownership fact matters: LabArchives is part of Dotmatics, itself part of a much larger scientific software portfolio, so it is one line in a roadmap that increasingly favours enterprise pharmaceutical customers. Labs choosing it for its academic pricing should watch what happens to that pricing over a renewal cycle or two.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about LabArchives.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Jupyter: If your records are computational rather than wet-lab and a versioned notebook in Git meets your retention needs


Box: If the requirement is only shared, retained file storage for a group rather than a witnessed experimental record


Microsoft OneDrive: If your institution already mandates it and you can accept file versioning without signing or witnessing
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Free
Free
Professional (Academic)
$330 /yr
ELN plus Inventory bundle
$360 /yr
Inventory standalone
$99 /yr
Scheduler
$35 /yr
Capabilities
Versioned entries
Every revision is retained and attributed; nothing is overwritten
Witnessing and signing
Page-level electronic signature and countersignature for patent and audit evidence
Inventory
Sample, reagent and freezer location tracking, sold as a separate per-user product
Scheduler
Booking for shared instruments and facilities, priced separately again
Education edition
Structured lab course notebooks with instructor grading views
Single sign-on
Institutional identity integration for campus-wide deployment
Structured data entry
Templates and widgets so protocol results are captured as fields rather than free text
DOI and repository publishing
Export of notebook pages for citation and long-term archiving
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Its versioning, timestamping and witnessed signatures are designed for that purpose, and it is widely accepted for it, but the legal weight depends on your institution's process being followed, not on the software alone.
Dotmatics. The product is branded LabArchives by Dotmatics and shares that company's corporate footprint.
Yes, with limited storage. It is suitable for trialling or a single researcher, not for a group that needs retention guarantees.
Yes, notebooks export in bulk, but exported archives lose much of the interactive structure, so treat the export as an archive rather than as a migration path into another ELN.
Keep looking
Electronic investigator site file and eRegulatory binder for clinical research sites
Research informatics group behind GraphPad Prism, SnapGene, Geneious and LabArchives, now owned by Siemens
Electronic lab notebook, LIMS and inventory in one system, now sold under the Cenevo group
Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management
Enterprise LIMS with integrated ELN and biobanking capability
No-code lab operating system combining LIMS, ELN and inventory for biotech teams
Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base
Electronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors
Scientific data cloud that harmonises instrument output across the lab estate
Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing
Enterprise LIMS for regulated QC laboratories, with LES and SDMS in one product
Automated consumer insights platform for testing advertising, product concepts and brand health
Symbolic and numeric computation environment built on the Wolfram Language and a curated knowledge base
Scientific data cloud that harmonises instrument output across the lab estate
Requirements and systems engineering for hardware teams, with published per-seat pricing
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for LabArchives, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Science-aware laboratory platform combining LIMS, ELN and scientific data management
quoteR&D cloud for biotechnology research and molecular biology
Free for academics, quoted for organisationsUX research repository for tagging notes, building insights and finding them again years later
Flat monthly fee, unlimited usersElectronic data capture and eConsent for clinical trials, built for investigator-initiated studies as well as sponsors
quote