Research · head to head
Condens vs Maze

Condens
Research
UX research repository for storing, tagging and sharing qualitative study findings
- From
- €15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Maze has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Condens the gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.; Maze maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum
- They diverge on capability: Condens covers Automatic transcription, Maze covers Prototype testing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Condens and Maze actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Condens
- Automatic transcription
- Highlight and tag
- Theme clustering
- Insight pages
- Participant profiles
- Search across studies
- Viewer seats
- Video clip reels
Only in Maze
- Prototype testing
- Usability testing
- Card sorting
- Tree testing
- Surveys
- 5-second tests
- A/B testing
- Analytics dashboard
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Condens
- A solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a monthnot Maze
- A European enterprise research team that needs GDPR-oriented data handling to clear internal procurementnot Maze
- A team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports itnot Maze
- A researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one placenot Maze
Maze
- User research and testingnot Condens
- AI-powered moderation featuresnot Condens
- Prototype and website testingnot Condens
- User feedback panelsnot Condens
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Condens
- The gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.
- Lite includes no viewer seats at all, which defeats the main purpose of a repository: anyone outside the research team who wants to read a finding has to be paid for as a contributor or sent a static export.
- Cross-project participant profiles are capped at 25 on Lite, so a solo researcher doing longitudinal work with a recurring panel outgrows the entry tier on that limit rather than on seats.
- As a bootstrapped fifteen-person company it ships AI synthesis, automatic theme extraction and moderated-interview features more slowly than venture-funded rivals, so teams that want the repository to do the analysis rather than organise it will find it behind.
- It is a repository, not a research platform: recruitment, panel management, unmoderated testing and survey fielding all live elsewhere, so it adds a subscription rather than consolidating one.
Maze
- Maze publishes no prices on its pricing page; every plan routes to contact sales, so pricing is by quote only with no published rate or minimum
- The AI study builder, AI moderated interviews and moderated interview studies are Enterprise only
- Mobile testing and testing through the Maze mobile app are Enterprise only
- Interview scheduling, card sorting and information architecture testing are Enterprise only
- Role-based access, SSO and compliance controls are Enterprise only
- Panel recruitment is available on all plans but with stated limits, and prototype testing carries limits below Enterprise
- Qualitative analysis of clip recordings, interview transcription and automated theme analysis are Enterprise only
Pricing, plan by plan
Condens
€15/month- Lite$15/month
- 1 contributor included, additional contributors 15 euros each
- No viewer seats
- Unlimited projects, transcription hours and storage
- Business$500/month
- 5 contributors included, additional contributors 85 euros each
- Unlimited viewers
- Unlimited participant profiles and folders
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Minimum 5 contributors
- Custom contributor rates
- Unlimited viewers
Maze
Free- FreeFree
- 1 active project
- Preview link testing
- Basic analytics
- Starter$75/month
- 3 active projects
- Unlimited responses
- Advanced analytics
- Team$150/month
- Unlimited projects
- Team collaboration
- Custom branding
- Enterprise$undefined/month
- Everything in Team
- SSO
- Dedicated CSM
Which should you pick?
Choose Maze if
- You need prototype testing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Api.
- You also want usability testing.
Questions people ask
- Is Condens or Maze better?
- Neither clearly leads. Condens starts at €15/month and Maze at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Condens or Maze?
- Maze has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €15/month for Condens and Free for Maze.
- Does Condens or Maze run on more platforms?
- Condens runs on Web. Maze runs on Web, Mobile, Api.
- Can I use Maze for free?
- Yes. Maze has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Condens starts at €15/month.
- What is Condens best used for?
- Condens is most often used for a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month, a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement, a team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports it, a researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one place. Of those, a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month and a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement are not what Maze is typically brought in for.
- What can Condens do that Maze cannot?
- Condens covers Automatic transcription, Highlight and tag, Theme clustering, Insight pages. Maze covers Prototype testing, Usability testing, Card sorting, Tree testing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Condens: Is there a free plan?
No, only a 15-day trial on any tier with no card required.
Maze: Does Maze offer a free trial or freemium tier?
Maze site indicates 'Try Maze for free' option, suggesting free tier or trial availability, but specific terms and limitations not stated on main page.
SourceCondens: Can stakeholders read findings without a licence?
Only on Business and above, where viewer seats are unlimited. Lite has none.
Maze: Can I request a custom demo if standard plans don't fit my needs?
Yes, Maze offers 'Request a demo' option, indicating willingness to discuss custom requirements and potentially custom pricing arrangements.
SourceCondens: Is transcription metered?
No. Transcription hours, storage and project count are unlimited on every plan; participant profiles and folders are what the tiers restrict.
Maze: What testing capabilities does Maze include in paid plans?
Maze features AI Moderator, prototype testing, panel recruitment, and website testing capabilities across plans, but specific feature tiers and pricing not disclosed publicly.
SourceCondens: Where is data hosted?
Condens is a German company with an explicitly GDPR-oriented setup, which is a common reason European enterprises shortlist it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Condens vs Dovetail
- Condens vs Aurelius
- Condens vs Marvin
- Condens vs Reduct
- Condens vs NVivo
- Condens vs Castor EDC
- Condens vs DNAnexus
- Condens vs Medidata Rave
- Condens vs Paperpile
- Condens vs Remesh
- Condens vs Scispot
- Condens vs Suzy
- Condens vs Valispace
- Condens vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Condens vs Zappi
- Condens vs Zotero
- Condens vs Elicit
- Condens vs Mendeley
- Condens vs Figma
- Condens vs Linear
- Condens vs Asana
- Condens vs ClickUp
- Condens vs Storybook
- Condens vs Sketch
- Condens vs Postman
- Condens vs Lovable
- Condens vs Canny
- Condens vs LaunchDarkly
- Condens vs Mixpanel
- Condens vs Pendo
- Condens vs Jira
- Condens vs Mozilla Firefox
- Condens vs Redis
- Condens vs Segment
- Condens vs Supabase
- Condens vs Safari
- Maze vs Dovetail
- Maze vs Aurelius
- Maze vs Marvin
- Maze vs Reduct
- Maze vs NVivo
- Maze vs Castor EDC
- Maze vs DNAnexus
- Maze vs Medidata Rave
- Maze vs Paperpile
- Maze vs Remesh
- Maze vs Scispot
- Maze vs Suzy
- Maze vs Valispace
- Maze vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Maze vs Zappi
- Maze vs Zotero
- Maze vs Elicit
- Maze vs Mendeley
- Maze vs Figma
- Maze vs Linear
- Maze vs Asana
- Maze vs ClickUp
- Maze vs Storybook
- Maze vs Sketch
- Maze vs Postman
- Maze vs Lovable
- Maze vs Canny
- Maze vs LaunchDarkly
- Maze vs Mixpanel
- Maze vs Pendo
- Maze vs Jira
- Maze vs Mozilla Firefox
- Maze vs Redis
- Maze vs Segment
- Maze vs Supabase
- Maze vs Safari

