Research · head to head
Condens vs Elicit

Condens
Research
UX research repository for storing, tagging and sharing qualitative study findings
- From
- €15/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Elicit has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Condens the gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.; Elicit pro and Scale plans available at different monthly prices; annual billing options not specified
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Condens and Elicit actually diverge.
Identical on both: platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Research).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Condens
- Automatic transcription
- Highlight and tag
- Theme clustering
- Insight pages
- Participant profiles
- Search across studies
- Viewer seats
- Video clip reels
Only in Elicit
Nothing recorded that Condens does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Condens
- A solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a monthnot Elicit
- A European enterprise research team that needs GDPR-oriented data handling to clear internal procurementnot Elicit
- A team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports itnot Elicit
- A researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one placenot Elicit
Elicit
- Screening and summarizing 40,000+ academic papers in systematic reviewsnot Condens
- Extracting structured data from 200+ research sources automaticallynot Condens
- Querying full-text papers using AI for custom literature analysisnot Condens
- Tracking new relevant research with personalized notification alertsnot Condens
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Condens
- The gap between the 15 euro Lite plan and the 500 euro Business plan has nothing in it, so a team adding a second and third researcher jumps roughly thirtyfold in cost at exactly the point budget scrutiny arrives.
- Lite includes no viewer seats at all, which defeats the main purpose of a repository: anyone outside the research team who wants to read a finding has to be paid for as a contributor or sent a static export.
- Cross-project participant profiles are capped at 25 on Lite, so a solo researcher doing longitudinal work with a recurring panel outgrows the entry tier on that limit rather than on seats.
- As a bootstrapped fifteen-person company it ships AI synthesis, automatic theme extraction and moderated-interview features more slowly than venture-funded rivals, so teams that want the repository to do the analysis rather than organise it will find it behind.
- It is a repository, not a research platform: recruitment, panel management, unmoderated testing and survey fielding all live elsewhere, so it adds a subscription rather than consolidating one.
Elicit
- Pro and Scale plans available at different monthly prices; annual billing options not specified
- Enterprise plan pricing not disclosed; requires contacting vendor
Pricing, plan by plan
Condens
€15/month- Lite$15/month
- 1 contributor included, additional contributors 15 euros each
- No viewer seats
- Unlimited projects, transcription hours and storage
- Business$500/month
- 5 contributors included, additional contributors 85 euros each
- Unlimited viewers
- Unlimited participant profiles and folders
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Minimum 5 contributors
- Custom contributor rates
- Unlimited viewers
Elicit
Free- BasicFree
- Limited usage for Research Agent and Research Reports
- Unlimited search across 138+ million papers
- Unlimited summaries and chat with papers
- Pro$49/month
- Standard usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
- Dedicated workflow screening up to 5,000 papers
- Up to 20 table columns
- Scale$169/month
- 5x usage for Research Agent, Research Reports, and Systematic Literature Reviews
- Figure extraction and interpretation
- Real-time team collaboration
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom usage limits
- Unlimited alerts and up to 40,000 paper screening
- Up to 40 table columns
Which should you pick?
Questions people ask
- Is Condens or Elicit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Condens starts at €15/month and Elicit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Condens or Elicit?
- Elicit has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at €15/month for Condens and Free for Elicit.
- Does Condens or Elicit run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- Can I use Elicit for free?
- Yes. Elicit has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Condens starts at €15/month.
- What is Condens best used for?
- Condens is most often used for a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month, a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement, a team wanting product managers to click from a stated insight straight to the participant clip that supports it, a researcher inheriting years of interview recordings and needing them transcribed, tagged and searchable in one place. Of those, a solo researcher at a 40-person product company building a searchable evidence base for 15 euros a month and a european enterprise research team that needs gdpr-oriented data handling to clear internal procurement are not what Elicit is typically brought in for.
- What can Condens do that Elicit cannot?
- Condens covers Automatic transcription, Highlight and tag, Theme clustering, Insight pages.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Condens: Is there a free plan?
No, only a 15-day trial on any tier with no card required.
Elicit: Does Elicit offer a free plan?
Yes, Elicit's Basic plan is free and includes unlimited search across 138+ million research papers, unlimited summaries, chat with papers, source viewing, and Zotero import. Limited usage is included for Research Agent and Research Reports.
SourceCondens: Can stakeholders read findings without a licence?
Only on Business and above, where viewer seats are unlimited. Lite has none.
Elicit: What is the difference between Elicit's Pro and Scale plans?
Elicit's Pro plan ($49/month) includes standard usage limits, dedicated screening of up to 5,000 papers, and access to 135 data sources. The Scale plan ($169/month) offers 5x higher usage limits, screening of up to 40,000 papers, figure extraction, team collaboration, and access to 200 data sources.
SourceCondens: Is transcription metered?
No. Transcription hours, storage and project count are unlimited on every plan; participant profiles and folders are what the tiers restrict.
Elicit: What security features does Elicit Enterprise offer?
Elicit's Enterprise plan includes single sign-on (SSO), SAML, two-factor authentication (2FA), PRISMA-grade screening and extraction accuracy, and a dedicated customer success team. Pricing is custom and requires contacting the vendor.
SourceCondens: Where is data hosted?
Condens is a German company with an explicitly GDPR-oriented setup, which is a common reason European enterprises shortlist it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Condens vs Dovetail
- Condens vs Aurelius
- Condens vs Marvin
- Condens vs Reduct
- Condens vs NVivo
- Condens vs Castor EDC
- Condens vs DNAnexus
- Condens vs Medidata Rave
- Condens vs Paperpile
- Condens vs Remesh
- Condens vs Scispot
- Condens vs Suzy
- Condens vs Valispace
- Condens vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Condens vs Zappi
- Condens vs Zotero
- Condens vs Mendeley
- Condens vs Obsidian
- Condens vs Roam Research
- Condens vs LabArchives
- Condens vs Benchling
- Condens vs LabVantage
- Condens vs Sapio Sciences
- Condens vs GWI
- Condens vs Chemaxon
- Elicit vs Dovetail
- Elicit vs Aurelius
- Elicit vs Marvin
- Elicit vs Reduct
- Elicit vs NVivo
- Elicit vs Castor EDC
- Elicit vs DNAnexus
- Elicit vs Medidata Rave
- Elicit vs Paperpile
- Elicit vs Remesh
- Elicit vs Scispot
- Elicit vs Suzy
- Elicit vs Valispace
- Elicit vs Wolfram Mathematica
- Elicit vs Zappi
- Elicit vs Zotero
- Elicit vs Mendeley
- Elicit vs Obsidian
- Elicit vs Roam Research
- Elicit vs LabArchives
- Elicit vs Benchling
- Elicit vs LabVantage
- Elicit vs Sapio Sciences
- Elicit vs GWI
- Elicit vs Chemaxon

