Softwr

Real Estate · head to head

Reonomy vs Yardi Voyager

Reonomy logo

Reonomy

Real Estate

Commercial property ownership and contact data platform, acquired by Altus Group for roughly $202 million and now sold on unpublished, increasingly enterprise-focused pricing

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Yardi Voyager logo

Yardi Voyager

Real Estate

Property management and accounting platform for institutional residential and commercial portfolios

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Reonomy pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.; Yardi Voyager implementation frequently costs as much as or more than the first year of licence fees, and the contract clock usually starts before the portfolio is live.
  • They diverge on capability: Reonomy covers Ownership records, Yardi Voyager covers Full property accounting.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Reonomy and Yardi Voyager actually diverge.

Attributes where Reonomy and Yardi Voyager differ
AttributeReonomyYardi Voyager
PlatformsWebWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Real Estate).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Reonomy

  • Ownership records
  • Transaction history
  • Off-market prospecting
  • Portfolio analysis
  • Contact data
  • Market and property search

Only in Yardi Voyager

  • Full property accounting
  • Multi-asset support
  • RentCafe
  • Budgeting and forecasting
  • Compliance modules
  • Yardi payment processing

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Reonomy

  • A broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criterianot Yardi Voyager
  • A lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending creditnot Yardi Voyager
  • An investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target marketnot Yardi Voyager
  • A firm already using ARGUS Enterprise considering Reonomy for data given the shared Altus Group ownershipnot Yardi Voyager

Yardi Voyager

  • An owner or fund manager that must produce audited investor reporting from the same system that runs operationsnot Reonomy
  • A mixed portfolio of commercial and residential assets that would otherwise need two systemsnot Reonomy
  • An affordable housing operator needing certification and regulatory compliance workflow built innot Reonomy
  • A third-party manager onboarding client portfolios that already report on Yardinot Reonomy

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Reonomy

  • Pricing is not published, and the sales process has become more enterprise-focused since the Altus Group acquisition, which reportedly makes it less accessible for smaller, self-service buyers than it once was.
  • It is a data and contact-sourcing tool, not a valuation platform, so firms needing DCF modelling still need ARGUS Enterprise or an equivalent separately, even though both are Altus Group products.
  • Coverage and data freshness for ownership and contact information vary by market, and off-market sourcing quality depends on how current that contact data actually is.
  • Shared ownership with ARGUS under Altus Group means a firm concentrating spend with both products has less independent competitive leverage across its CRE software and data budget.
  • As with any owner-contact database, deliverability and accuracy of contact information degrade over time, and there is no independent public benchmark of Reonomy data accuracy to check ahead of purchase.

Yardi Voyager

  • Implementation frequently costs as much as or more than the first year of licence fees, and the contract clock usually starts before the portfolio is live.
  • Module-based pricing means the quoted per-unit rate covers far less than most operators assume, and adding resident portals, procurement or utility billing repeatedly reopens the budget.
  • Reporting beyond the standard set often requires Yardi consultants or a specialist partner, so internal teams stay dependent on paid services for routine changes.
  • Parts of the interface remain dense and dated, which lengthens onboarding for site staff and drives some operators to buy a separate front-end product.
  • Exporting a full portfolio history to another platform is slow and costly, so switching decisions are effectively made once a decade rather than at each renewal.

Pricing, plan by plan

Reonomy

On request
  • Reonomy$undefined/year
    • Monthly and annual subscription options, annual saves roughly 30%
    • Pricing not published, increasingly enterprise-focused sales process since Altus Group acquisition
    • Cost scales with data access scope and seats

Yardi Voyager

On request
  • Yardi Voyager$undefined/year
    • Quoted per unit per month with annual minimums
    • Each module such as RentCafe, procurement or utility billing priced separately
    • Implementation, data migration and training charged as professional services

Which should you pick?

Choose Reonomy if

  • You need ownership records.
  • You also want transaction history.
Reonomy review

Choose Yardi Voyager if

  • You need full property accounting.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want multi-asset support.
Yardi Voyager review

Questions people ask

Is Reonomy or Yardi Voyager better?
Neither clearly leads. Reonomy starts at On request and Yardi Voyager at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Reonomy or Yardi Voyager?
Reonomy starts at On request and Yardi Voyager at On request.
Does Reonomy or Yardi Voyager run on more platforms?
Reonomy runs on Web. Yardi Voyager runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Reonomy best used for?
Reonomy is most often used for a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria, a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit, an investor doing outbound outreach to owners of a specific property type or size in a target market, a firm already using argus enterprise considering reonomy for data given the shared altus group ownership. Of those, a broker sourcing off-market deals by identifying and directly contacting property owners matching acquisition criteria and a lender researching an owner portfolio and financing history before extending credit are not what Yardi Voyager is typically brought in for.
What can Reonomy do that Yardi Voyager cannot?
Reonomy covers Ownership records, Transaction history, Off-market prospecting, Portfolio analysis. Yardi Voyager covers Full property accounting, Multi-asset support, RentCafe, Budgeting and forecasting.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Reonomy: Who owns Reonomy?

Altus Group, which acquired it in November 2021 for roughly $202 million; it sits in the same portfolio as ARGUS Enterprise.

Yardi Voyager: Does Yardi publish Voyager pricing?

No. Only Breeze, the small portfolio product, has published per-unit rates. Voyager is quoted per unit per module against annual minimums.

Reonomy: Is Reonomy the same as CoStar?

No. Reonomy focuses on ownership, contact and off-market sourcing data; CoStar is broader, covering listings, lease comparables and market analytics at larger scale.

Yardi Voyager: How long does implementation take?

Months rather than weeks for anything beyond a small single-asset-class portfolio, and professional services are charged separately.

Reonomy: Is pricing available online?

No. Reonomy offers monthly and annual subscriptions with roughly 30% savings annually, but exact rates require a quote.

Yardi Voyager: Is Voyager suitable under 1,000 units?

Usually not. Yardi steers smaller portfolios to Breeze or Breeze Premier, and the Voyager cost structure rarely justifies itself at that size.

Share

Related pages

More on Reonomy

More on Yardi Voyager

Keep looking

Other head to heads