Manufacturing · head to head
Waites Sensor Technologies vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Waites Sensor Technologies
Manufacturing
Wireless multi-point vibration and temperature monitoring sold as a monitored service, not software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Waites Sensor Technologies the radio protocol, gateways, sensors and analytics are a single proprietary stack, so the hardware investment cannot later be redirected at a different analytics vendor.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Waites Sensor Technologies covers Multi-point nodes, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Waites Sensor Technologies and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Waites Sensor Technologies | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Waites Sensor Technologies
- Multi-point nodes
- Full-spectrum vibration
- Long-range radio
- Long battery life
- High-temperature variant
- Machine learning analysis
- Analyst review
- Stainless steel housing
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Waites Sensor Technologies
- A plant instrumenting hundreds of motor and pump trains where six-point nodes cut the battery and radio maintenance burdennot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A food processing site needing washdown-rated wireless sensors that survive daily sanitationnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Monitoring high-temperature equipment where conventional wireless sensors fail before the bearing doesnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A reliability team with no in-house vibration analyst that needs findings, not spectra, delivered as a servicenot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot Waites Sensor Technologies
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot Waites Sensor Technologies
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot Waites Sensor Technologies
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot Waites Sensor Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Waites Sensor Technologies
- The radio protocol, gateways, sensors and analytics are a single proprietary stack, so the hardware investment cannot later be redirected at a different analytics vendor.
- No pricing is published while the marketing claims a fraction of competitors cost, so the central claim cannot be verified without entering a sales process.
- A multi-point node is a single point of failure for six measurement points; when the node or its battery fails, six machines go dark rather than one.
- Wired accelerometer runs back to the node reintroduce cable routing and mechanical protection work that single-sensor wireless products were meant to eliminate.
- The company is small and its presence is concentrated in North America, so installation support, spares and analyst coverage outside that region depend on partners rather than direct service.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Waites Sensor Technologies
On request- Waites condition monitoring$undefined/year
- Priced per monitored machine or measurement point on an annual programme
- Hardware, gateways, platform access and analyst review bundled in the programme fee
- Installation and sensor mounting quoted as a services engagement
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Waites Sensor Technologies if
- You need multi-point nodes.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want full-spectrum vibration.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is Waites Sensor Technologies or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Waites Sensor Technologies starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Waites Sensor Technologies or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- Waites Sensor Technologies starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
- Does Waites Sensor Technologies or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- Waites Sensor Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Waites Sensor Technologies best used for?
- Waites Sensor Technologies is most often used for a plant instrumenting hundreds of motor and pump trains where six-point nodes cut the battery and radio maintenance burden, a food processing site needing washdown-rated wireless sensors that survive daily sanitation, monitoring high-temperature equipment where conventional wireless sensors fail before the bearing does, a reliability team with no in-house vibration analyst that needs findings, not spectra, delivered as a service. Of those, a plant instrumenting hundreds of motor and pump trains where six-point nodes cut the battery and radio maintenance burden and a food processing site needing washdown-rated wireless sensors that survive daily sanitation are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can Waites Sensor Technologies do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- Waites Sensor Technologies covers Multi-point nodes, Full-spectrum vibration, Long-range radio, Long battery life. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Waites Sensor Technologies: How many points does one node monitor?
Up to six, using wired accelerometers back to a single wireless node.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
Waites Sensor Technologies: Is analyst review included?
Waites includes analyst review in its programme model rather than selling it as separate consultancy, which is the main structural difference from sensor-only vendors.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
Waites Sensor Technologies: What is the wireless range?
Around 3,000 feet line of sight, which usually means fewer gateways per plant than short-range mesh alternatives.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
Waites Sensor Technologies: Can I export the raw data?
There is an API, but the sensors and radio are proprietary, so the data path runs through the Waites platform.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
Related pages
More on Waites Sensor Technologies
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs KCF Technologies
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Sensemore
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Augury
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Erbessd Instruments
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs MOVUS
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Petasense
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Samotics
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Poseidon Systems
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs PROGNOST Systems
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs eMaint
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs AMFG
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Aras Innovator
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Arena PLM
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Authentise
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Ignition
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs ABB 800xA
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs AVEVA System Platform
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs GENESIS Version 11
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs JobBOSS²
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs QAD Redzone
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Sight Machine
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Oden Technologies
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs GrabCAD Print
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Guidewheel
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Kepware Server
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs KCF Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sensemore
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Augury
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Erbessd Instruments
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs MOVUS
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Petasense
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Samotics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Poseidon Systems
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs PROGNOST Systems
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs eMaint
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AMFG
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Aras Innovator
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Arena PLM
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
