Manufacturing · head to head
Sensemore vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

Sensemore
Manufacturing
Low-cost wireless vibration and temperature monitoring with cloud analytics from a Turkish sensor manufacturer
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sensemore the company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sensemore and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Sensemore | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sensemore
- Wireless vibration sensors
- Handheld analyser
- Cloud platform
- Machine learning models
- Multi-sensor synchronisation
- Gateways
- Open API
- Alarm notifications
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sensemore
- A cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlistnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A mid-market manufacturer where the Western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirelynot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- An integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation projectnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main costnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot Sensemore
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot Sensemore
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot Sensemore
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot Sensemore
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sensemore
- The company is small and young, so the failure-mode library behind its models is built on a much narrower installed base than SKF or Augury can draw on, and diagnostic specificity reflects that.
- Support and spares are largely delivered through distributors, so response quality varies by country and buyers outside Turkey and the immediate region should verify local coverage before ordering.
- Pricing is not published and routes through integrators, which means the software cost is often bundled into a project price you cannot decompose.
- Long-term vendor viability is an open question for a venture-stage hardware company, and a sensor network is a ten-year commitment; an exit or wind-down would strand the installed hardware.
- Documentation and the analytics user interface are thinner than established competitors, so teams without vibration expertise get less guidance in interpreting what the platform flags.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sensemore
On request- Sensemore platform$undefined/year
- Hardware purchased per monitoring point
- Cloud platform subscription quoted by sensor count
- Sold largely through distributors and system integrators
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose Sensemore if
- You need wireless vibration sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want handheld analyser.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is Sensemore or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sensemore starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sensemore or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- Sensemore starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
- Does Sensemore or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- Sensemore runs on Web, iOS, Android. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Sensemore best used for?
- Sensemore is most often used for a cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlist, a mid-market manufacturer where the western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirely, an integrator packaging condition monitoring into a broader plant automation project, a water utility instrumenting remote pumping stations where sending a technician to take readings is the main cost. Of those, a cement plant that wants coverage across the whole motor fleet rather than only the critical shortlist and a mid-market manufacturer where the western vendors quotes exceed the maintenance budget entirely are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can Sensemore do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- Sensemore covers Wireless vibration sensors, Handheld analyser, Cloud platform, Machine learning models. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sensemore: Where is Sensemore based?
Istanbul, Turkey. It designs and manufactures its own sensing hardware.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
Sensemore: Is pricing published?
No. Hardware and platform are quoted, usually through a distributor or system integrator.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
Sensemore: How does it compare on cost?
It is positioned below the established Western condition monitoring vendors, which is the reason most buyers evaluate it.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
Sensemore: Can I get the raw data out?
Yes, there is a REST API and MQTT support for pulling measurements into other systems.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
Related pages
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- Sensemore vs KCF Technologies
- Sensemore vs Augury
- Sensemore vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Sensemore vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Sensemore vs Erbessd Instruments
- Sensemore vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Sensemore vs MOVUS
- Sensemore vs Petasense
- Sensemore vs Poseidon Systems
- Sensemore vs Samotics
- Sensemore vs PROGNOST Systems
- Sensemore vs eMaint
- Sensemore vs Prodsmart
- Sensemore vs Propel
- Sensemore vs ProShop ERP
- Sensemore vs Protolabs
- Sensemore vs Ignition
- Sensemore vs ABB 800xA
- Sensemore vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Sensemore vs AVEVA System Platform
- Sensemore vs GENESIS Version 11
- Sensemore vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Sensemore vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Sensemore vs JobBOSS²
- Sensemore vs QAD Redzone
- Sensemore vs Sight Machine
- Sensemore vs Authentise
- Sensemore vs Oden Technologies
- Sensemore vs GrabCAD Print
- Sensemore vs Guidewheel
- Sensemore vs Kepware Server
- Sensemore vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs KCF Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Augury
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Erbessd Instruments
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs MOVUS
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Petasense
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Poseidon Systems
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Samotics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs PROGNOST Systems
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs eMaint
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Prodsmart
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Propel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ProShop ERP
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Protolabs
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
