Manufacturing · head to head
Oden Technologies vs Waites Sensor Technologies

Oden Technologies
Manufacturing
Process analytics for continuous production, strongest in plastics extrusion and moulding
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Waites Sensor Technologies
Manufacturing
Wireless multi-point vibration and temperature monitoring sold as a monitored service, not software
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Oden Technologies the depth is in plastics and continuous processing, so a discrete job shop with short runs and frequent changeovers does not generate the repetition the analysis needs and will get little from it.; Waites Sensor Technologies the radio protocol, gateways, sensors and analytics are a single proprietary stack, so the hardware investment cannot later be redirected at a different analytics vendor.
- They diverge on capability: Oden Technologies covers High frequency data collection, Waites Sensor Technologies covers Multi-point nodes.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Oden Technologies and Waites Sensor Technologies actually diverge.
| Attribute | Oden Technologies | Waites Sensor Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, API | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Oden Technologies
- High frequency data collection
- Reference run analysis
- Scrap and yield analytics
- Line and plant dashboards
- PLC and historian connectivity
- Alerting on process drift
Only in Waites Sensor Technologies
- Multi-point nodes
- Full-spectrum vibration
- Long-range radio
- Long battery life
- High-temperature variant
- Machine learning analysis
- Analyst review
- Stainless steel housing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Oden Technologies
- A plastics extrusion plant losing material to scrap when settings drift between shifts and operatorsnot Waites Sensor Technologies
- A moulder that wants to know which parameter combination produced its best historical run of a given partnot Waites Sensor Technologies
- A continuous processor whose historian holds years of data that nobody has turned into operating guidancenot Waites Sensor Technologies
- A multi site group wanting comparable line performance figures across plants that currently report differentlynot Waites Sensor Technologies
Waites Sensor Technologies
- A plant instrumenting hundreds of motor and pump trains where six-point nodes cut the battery and radio maintenance burdennot Oden Technologies
- A food processing site needing washdown-rated wireless sensors that survive daily sanitationnot Oden Technologies
- Monitoring high-temperature equipment where conventional wireless sensors fail before the bearing doesnot Oden Technologies
- A reliability team with no in-house vibration analyst that needs findings, not spectra, delivered as a servicenot Oden Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Oden Technologies
- The depth is in plastics and continuous processing, so a discrete job shop with short runs and frequent changeovers does not generate the repetition the analysis needs and will get little from it.
- It depends on fast process data from PLCs or a historian, so a plant with older machines that have no controller data must pay for instrumentation before the software does anything, which is the opposite of a low friction rollout.
- Realising the benefit requires process engineers who can act on the findings, and a plant without that capability ends up with analysis nobody converts into standard operating conditions.
- Pricing is per line and not published, so a plant with many small lines pays in proportion to line count rather than to output value, and the economics favour fewer high value lines.
- It overlaps with historian and SCADA investments a plant may already have, and buyers frequently have to justify why an existing AVEVA or Ignition estate cannot be made to do a version of the same job.
Waites Sensor Technologies
- The radio protocol, gateways, sensors and analytics are a single proprietary stack, so the hardware investment cannot later be redirected at a different analytics vendor.
- No pricing is published while the marketing claims a fraction of competitors cost, so the central claim cannot be verified without entering a sales process.
- A multi-point node is a single point of failure for six measurement points; when the node or its battery fails, six machines go dark rather than one.
- Wired accelerometer runs back to the node reintroduce cable routing and mechanical protection work that single-sensor wireless products were meant to eliminate.
- The company is small and its presence is concentrated in North America, so installation support, spares and analyst coverage outside that region depend on partners rather than direct service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Oden Technologies
On request- Oden$undefined/year
- Per line data collection and analytics
- Reference run and yield analysis
- Connectivity to PLCs and historians
Waites Sensor Technologies
On request- Waites condition monitoring$undefined/year
- Priced per monitored machine or measurement point on an annual programme
- Hardware, gateways, platform access and analyst review bundled in the programme fee
- Installation and sensor mounting quoted as a services engagement
Which should you pick?
Choose Oden Technologies if
- You need high frequency data collection.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want reference run analysis.
Choose Waites Sensor Technologies if
- You need multi-point nodes.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want full-spectrum vibration.
Questions people ask
- Is Oden Technologies or Waites Sensor Technologies better?
- Neither clearly leads. Oden Technologies starts at On request and Waites Sensor Technologies at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Oden Technologies or Waites Sensor Technologies?
- Oden Technologies starts at On request and Waites Sensor Technologies at On request.
- Does Oden Technologies or Waites Sensor Technologies run on more platforms?
- Oden Technologies runs on Web, API. Waites Sensor Technologies runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Oden Technologies best used for?
- Oden Technologies is most often used for a plastics extrusion plant losing material to scrap when settings drift between shifts and operators, a moulder that wants to know which parameter combination produced its best historical run of a given part, a continuous processor whose historian holds years of data that nobody has turned into operating guidance, a multi site group wanting comparable line performance figures across plants that currently report differently. Of those, a plastics extrusion plant losing material to scrap when settings drift between shifts and operators and a moulder that wants to know which parameter combination produced its best historical run of a given part are not what Waites Sensor Technologies is typically brought in for.
- What can Oden Technologies do that Waites Sensor Technologies cannot?
- Oden Technologies covers High frequency data collection, Reference run analysis, Scrap and yield analytics, Line and plant dashboards. Waites Sensor Technologies covers Multi-point nodes, Full-spectrum vibration, Long-range radio, Long battery life.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Oden Technologies: Is it suitable for a machine shop?
Not really. It is built for continuous and repetitive high volume processes, not short run discrete machining.
Waites Sensor Technologies: How many points does one node monitor?
Up to six, using wired accelerometers back to a single wireless node.
Oden Technologies: Does it need a historian?
No, it can collect directly from PLCs, but it will read from an existing historian where one is present.
Waites Sensor Technologies: Is analyst review included?
Waites includes analyst review in its programme model rather than selling it as separate consultancy, which is the main structural difference from sensor-only vendors.
Oden Technologies: What is the main measurable outcome?
Scrap reduction and throughput improvement on repeated products, rather than labour savings.
Waites Sensor Technologies: What is the wireless range?
Around 3,000 feet line of sight, which usually means fewer gateways per plant than short-range mesh alternatives.
Oden Technologies: Will it work on machines without PLC data?
No. Those machines need instrumenting first, and that cost belongs in the business case.
Waites Sensor Technologies: Can I export the raw data?
There is an API, but the sensors and radio are proprietary, so the data path runs through the Waites platform.
Related pages
More on Oden Technologies
More on Waites Sensor Technologies
Other head to heads
- Oden Technologies vs Ignition
- Oden Technologies vs TrakSYS
- Oden Technologies vs KCF Technologies
- Oden Technologies vs Seeq
- Oden Technologies vs TrendMiner
- Oden Technologies vs Sensemore
- Oden Technologies vs Augury
- Oden Technologies vs Guidewheel
- Oden Technologies vs Kepware Server
- Oden Technologies vs ABB 800xA
- Oden Technologies vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Oden Technologies vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Oden Technologies vs AVEVA System Platform
- Oden Technologies vs Hippo CMMS
- Oden Technologies vs 3YOURMIND
- Oden Technologies vs Erbessd Instruments
- Oden Technologies vs MOVUS
- Oden Technologies vs Petasense
- Oden Technologies vs Samotics
- Oden Technologies vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Oden Technologies vs Poseidon Systems
- Oden Technologies vs PROGNOST Systems
- Oden Technologies vs eMaint
- Oden Technologies vs AMFG
- Oden Technologies vs Aras Innovator
- Oden Technologies vs Arena PLM
- Oden Technologies vs Authentise
- Oden Technologies vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Oden Technologies vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Ignition
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs TrakSYS
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs KCF Technologies
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Seeq
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs TrendMiner
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Sensemore
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Augury
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Guidewheel
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Kepware Server
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs ABB 800xA
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs AVEVA System Platform
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Hippo CMMS
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs 3YOURMIND
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Erbessd Instruments
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs MOVUS
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Petasense
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Samotics
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Poseidon Systems
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs PROGNOST Systems
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs eMaint
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs AMFG
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Aras Innovator
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Arena PLM
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Authentise
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Waites Sensor Technologies vs COPA-DATA zenon
