Manufacturing · head to head
AMFG vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP

AMFG
Manufacturing
Automated quoting and production workflow software for machine shops and additive bureaus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Manufacturing
Distributed control system for continuous process plants with a documented 30-year upgrade path
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: AMFG no pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.; Yokogawa CENTUM VP there is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- They diverge on capability: AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which AMFG and Yokogawa CENTUM VP actually diverge.
| Attribute | AMFG | Yokogawa CENTUM VP |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web, Cloud | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in AMFG
- Geometric auto-quoting
- 2D drawing analysis
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control
- Quality tracking
- Customer portal
- CAD and CAM plugins
Only in Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Field Control Station
- N-IO
- Human Interface Station
- ProSafe-RS integration
- Vnet/IP
- Migration from CS 1000 and CS 3000
- Exaquantum integration
- Alarm management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
AMFG
- A machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hoursnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- An additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machinesnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- A manufacturer running AM and CNC in the same facility and wanting one production record across bothnot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automaticallynot Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Replacing end-of-life CENTUM CS 3000 controllers during a refinery turnaround without pulling field cablingnot AMFG
- Greenfield LNG train where the control and safety systems must share one operator console and one event lognot AMFG
- Specialty chemicals batch plant needing sequence control with recipe management and full electronic batch recordsnot AMFG
- Combined cycle power station where 99.99999 percent availability figures are written into the contractnot AMFG
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
AMFG
- No pricing is published in any form, and the product is sold by module and site, so total cost is invisible until you are several sales calls in.
- Automated quoting only becomes accurate once your cost model, machine rates and material data are properly loaded, so the value arrives months after go-live and early quotes need human checking.
- The product started in additive manufacturing and has pivoted its marketing towards CNC machine shops, which means some CNC-specific depth is newer than the additive lineage and worth testing against your actual process mix.
- It overlaps heavily with ERP and MES scope, so shops with an existing ERP face an ownership decision over scheduling and customer records that is a political problem, not a technical one.
- It is a comparatively small vendor against established shop-floor systems, so integration work into an incumbent ERP will fall largely on you or a partner rather than on a pre-built certified connector.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- There is no published price list and no way to size a budget without engaging Yokogawa or an EPC, so early-stage comparison against DeltaV or Experion is guesswork until quotations arrive.
- Engineering and commissioning routinely cost several times the hardware and software, and owners who budget from the equipment quote alone are consistently short.
- The ecosystem is closed: controllers, I/O and diagnostics are Yokogawa, and third-party alternatives at the controller layer do not exist, so the vendor holds pricing power for the twenty years or more the plant runs.
- Operator stations run on Windows and are tied to specific validated Windows releases, so operating system end-of-life forces console refresh cycles that are governed by Yokogawa validation rather than by your IT policy.
- Engineering staff who know CENTUM are scarce outside Japan, the Middle East and South East Asia, and in North America and Europe you will pay a premium or depend on Yokogawa’s own services organisation for changes.
Pricing, plan by plan
AMFG
On request- AMFG$undefined/year
- Automated quoting and estimating
- Production planning and scheduling
- Shop-floor control and quality tracking
Yokogawa CENTUM VP
On request- CENTUM VP$undefined/year
- Priced as an engineered system, not a per-seat licence
- Cost driven by I/O count, controller redundancy and number of operator stations
- Engineering, FAT, commissioning and training quoted separately and usually exceed hardware
Which should you pick?
Choose AMFG if
- You need geometric auto-quoting.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want 2d drawing analysis.
Choose Yokogawa CENTUM VP if
- You need field control station.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want n-io.
Questions people ask
- Is AMFG or Yokogawa CENTUM VP better?
- Neither clearly leads. AMFG starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, AMFG or Yokogawa CENTUM VP?
- AMFG starts at On request and Yokogawa CENTUM VP at On request.
- Does AMFG or Yokogawa CENTUM VP run on more platforms?
- AMFG runs on Web, Cloud. Yokogawa CENTUM VP runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is AMFG best used for?
- AMFG is most often used for a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours, an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines, a manufacturer running am and cnc in the same facility and wanting one production record across both, replacing an email and spreadsheet ordering process with a customer portal that produces priced quotes automatically. Of those, a machine shop losing work because quoting takes three days and competitors answer in three hours and an additive bureau that needs one system for order intake, build scheduling and traceability across several machines are not what Yokogawa CENTUM VP is typically brought in for.
- What can AMFG do that Yokogawa CENTUM VP cannot?
- AMFG covers Geometric auto-quoting, 2D drawing analysis, Production planning and scheduling, Shop-floor control. Yokogawa CENTUM VP covers Field Control Station, N-IO, Human Interface Station, ProSafe-RS integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
AMFG: Does AMFG replace my ERP?
No. It covers quoting through shop-floor execution and quality. Finance, purchasing and inventory usually stay in the ERP, and you must decide which system owns scheduling.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Can I upgrade from CENTUM CS 3000 without rewiring the plant?
Yes. Yokogawa sells migration packages that replace the controller and keep existing field wiring and marshalling, which is the main reason CENTUM installations stay CENTUM.
AMFG: Is it only for 3D printing?
No, though that is where it started. It now targets CNC machine shops as well and markets quoting for machining, sheet metal and additive.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Is CENTUM VP sold as a subscription?
No. It is a capital purchase of hardware and licences with an annual service agreement for updates and support.
AMFG: How accurate is automated quoting out of the box?
Not accurate until your machine rates, materials and cost model are configured. Treat the first months of quotes as assisted rather than automatic.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: How does it compare with Emerson DeltaV on cost?
Neither publishes prices. CENTUM tends to win on brownfield migration cost because the field wiring stays; DeltaV tends to be cheaper on small greenfield systems.
AMFG: Is pricing published?
No. It is quoted by number of users, sites and selected modules.
Yokogawa CENTUM VP: Do I need a separate safety system?
Yes, for SIL-rated functions. ProSafe-RS is the Yokogawa SIS and shares the CENTUM engineering database and operator console.
Related pages
More on Yokogawa CENTUM VP
Other head to heads
- AMFG vs Paperless Parts
- AMFG vs JobBOSS²
- AMFG vs 3YOURMIND
- AMFG vs Authentise
- AMFG vs Oqton
- AMFG vs Dyndrite
- AMFG vs Materialise Magics
- AMFG vs Autodesk Netfabb
- AMFG vs Fictiv
- AMFG vs Simplify3D
- AMFG vs Formlabs PreForm
- AMFG vs GrabCAD Print
- AMFG vs Kepware Server
- AMFG vs Litmus Edge
- AMFG vs Maintenance Connection
- AMFG vs Markforged Eiger
- AMFG vs MOVUS
- AMFG vs Ignition
- AMFG vs ABB 800xA
- AMFG vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- AMFG vs AVEVA System Platform
- AMFG vs GENESIS Version 11
- AMFG vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- AMFG vs COPA-DATA zenon
- AMFG vs QAD Redzone
- AMFG vs Sight Machine
- AMFG vs Oden Technologies
- AMFG vs Guidewheel
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Paperless Parts
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs JobBOSS²
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs 3YOURMIND
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Authentise
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oqton
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Dyndrite
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Materialise Magics
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Fictiv
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Simplify3D
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Formlabs PreForm
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GrabCAD Print
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Kepware Server
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Litmus Edge
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Maintenance Connection
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Markforged Eiger
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs MOVUS
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Ignition
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs ABB 800xA
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs AVEVA System Platform
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs GENESIS Version 11
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs QAD Redzone
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Sight Machine
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Oden Technologies
- Yokogawa CENTUM VP vs Guidewheel
