Travel · head to head
Corporate Traveller vs Shiji

Corporate Traveller
Travel
SME travel management from Flight Centre, combining the Melon booking platform with a named consultant
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shiji
Travel
Enterprise hospitality platform covering PMS, point of sale and payments, owned by a Chinese listed group
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Corporate Traveller service quality depends heavily on the individual consultant assigned, and a consultant leaving is a real disruption because the relationship rather than the software carries the institutional knowledge.; Shiji chinese ownership and a Shenzhen listing raise data residency and supply chain questions that must be settled during procurement, and in United States government or defence-adjacent accounts they can end the evaluation outright.
- They diverge on capability: Corporate Traveller covers Melon booking platform, Shiji covers Daylight PMS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Corporate Traveller and Shiji actually diverge.
| Attribute | Corporate Traveller | Shiji |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Travel).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Corporate Traveller
- Melon booking platform
- Dedicated consultant
- Trip Proposals
- Negotiated fare access
- Spend reporting
- Traveller tracking
Only in Shiji
- Daylight PMS
- Infrasys POS
- Payments
- Distribution
- Guest engagement
- Open API access
- Regional data centres
- Multi-language and multi-currency
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Corporate Traveller
- A fifty-person firm with no travel manager that needs someone to fix a stranded traveller at 2amnot Shiji
- An SME wanting airline and hotel rates it could not negotiate on its own volumenot Shiji
- A business whose arrangers book for executives and want option sets proposed rather than searchednot Shiji
- A company introducing a travel policy for the first time and needing it enforced at bookingnot Shiji
Shiji
- An international luxury group replacing Opera across dozens of properties without moving to a small cloud vendornot Corporate Traveller
- A resort with a dozen restaurants and bars needing one point of sale across all outletsnot Corporate Traveller
- An Asia Pacific group requiring native multi-currency, multi-language operation across marketsnot Corporate Traveller
- A hotel company consolidating PMS, POS and payment onto a single vendor contractnot Corporate Traveller
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Corporate Traveller
- Service quality depends heavily on the individual consultant assigned, and a consultant leaving is a real disruption because the relationship rather than the software carries the institutional knowledge.
- Agency revenue includes supplier commissions and overrides that are not disclosed to the client, so the cheapest option for you and the most profitable option for the agency are not always the same booking.
- Melon is competent but narrower than TravelPerk or Navan on self-service features, and companies that genuinely want no human involvement will resent paying for one.
- Consultant-assisted bookings carry meaningfully higher fees than online ones, and the fee mix is where an apparently cheap contract turns expensive.
- It operates through separate country entities with different content, contracts and service hours, so a multi-country roll-out is several negotiations rather than one.
Shiji
- Chinese ownership and a Shenzhen listing raise data residency and supply chain questions that must be settled during procurement, and in United States government or defence-adjacent accounts they can end the evaluation outright.
- Pricing is entirely quoted with no published figures at any product level, so comparing Shiji against Oracle or Mews on cost requires a full sales engagement.
- The portfolio is partly assembled from acquisitions, and the degree of integration between products varies, so a group buying several Shiji modules should test the joins rather than assume them.
- Implementation timelines at enterprise scale run to many months and require interface development that is charged on top of licence, which is a substantial hidden budget line.
- It is not a realistic option below roughly the mid-scale group level; a single independent hotel will not get sensible pricing or attention.
Pricing, plan by plan
Corporate Traveller
On request- Corporate Traveller$undefined/year
- Transaction fees per online and per consultant-assisted booking
- Melon platform typically bundled with the service
- Supplier commissions and overrides retained by the agency
Shiji
On request- Shiji Enterprise Platform$undefined/year
- Quoted per property and per portfolio
- PMS, POS and payments priced as separate lines
- Implementation and interface development charged separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Corporate Traveller if
- You need melon booking platform.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want dedicated consultant.
Choose Shiji if
- You need daylight pms.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want infrasys pos.
Questions people ask
- Is Corporate Traveller or Shiji better?
- Neither clearly leads. Corporate Traveller starts at On request and Shiji at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Corporate Traveller or Shiji?
- Corporate Traveller starts at On request and Shiji at On request.
- Does Corporate Traveller or Shiji run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Corporate Traveller best used for?
- Corporate Traveller is most often used for a fifty-person firm with no travel manager that needs someone to fix a stranded traveller at 2am, an sme wanting airline and hotel rates it could not negotiate on its own volume, a business whose arrangers book for executives and want option sets proposed rather than searched, a company introducing a travel policy for the first time and needing it enforced at booking. Of those, a fifty-person firm with no travel manager that needs someone to fix a stranded traveller at 2am and an sme wanting airline and hotel rates it could not negotiate on its own volume are not what Shiji is typically brought in for.
- What can Corporate Traveller do that Shiji cannot?
- Corporate Traveller covers Melon booking platform, Dedicated consultant, Trip Proposals, Negotiated fare access. Shiji covers Daylight PMS, Infrasys POS, Payments, Distribution.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Corporate Traveller: Can I buy Melon without the consultant service?
No. Melon is sold as part of the managed Corporate Traveller service, not as standalone software.
Shiji: What do you actually buy from Shiji?
Most commonly Daylight PMS, Infrasys point of sale, or both, plus payments. The group name covers a wider portfolio than any one hotel purchases.
Corporate Traveller: Who owns it?
Flight Centre Travel Group, listed in Australia. Corporate Traveller is its SME brand, distinct from FCM which serves large enterprises.
Shiji: Does Chinese ownership matter?
It can. For United States government-adjacent business and some corporate accounts it triggers data residency and supply chain review, so raise it at the start of procurement rather than at contract stage.
Corporate Traveller: Does it disclose supplier commissions?
Not by default. If commission transparency matters, ask for it explicitly in the contract before signing.
Shiji: Is Shiji an alternative to Oracle Hospitality?
Yes, and that is largely its positioning at the enterprise end, particularly in international luxury groups where Infrasys already has deployment.
Shiji: Can a single hotel buy it?
In principle, but the commercial model, implementation cost and support structure assume a group, and small properties are better served elsewhere.
Related pages
More on Corporate Traveller
Other head to heads
- Corporate Traveller vs Egencia
- Corporate Traveller vs BCD TripSource
- Corporate Traveller vs myCWT
- Corporate Traveller vs Sabre Red 360
- Corporate Traveller vs Travelport Smartpoint
- Corporate Traveller vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Corporate Traveller vs Spotnana
- Corporate Traveller vs Bokun
- Corporate Traveller vs FareHarbor
- Corporate Traveller vs Skyscanner
- Corporate Traveller vs Bookinglayer
- Corporate Traveller vs Expedia
- Corporate Traveller vs TicketingHub
- Corporate Traveller vs Apaleo
- Corporate Traveller vs Beds24
- Corporate Traveller vs DPGO
- Corporate Traveller vs Enso Connect
- Corporate Traveller vs RoomRaccoon
- Corporate Traveller vs Opera PMS
- Corporate Traveller vs Stayntouch
- Corporate Traveller vs Mews
- Corporate Traveller vs Protel
- Corporate Traveller vs Hotelogix
- Corporate Traveller vs WebRezPro
- Corporate Traveller vs Grab
- Corporate Traveller vs Careem
- Corporate Traveller vs IDeaS
- Corporate Traveller vs Chekin
- Corporate Traveller vs Tokeet
- Corporate Traveller vs TrustYou
- Corporate Traveller vs Bolt
- Corporate Traveller vs Lodgify
- Shiji vs Egencia
- Shiji vs BCD TripSource
- Shiji vs myCWT
- Shiji vs Sabre Red 360
- Shiji vs Travelport Smartpoint
- Shiji vs Amadeus Selling Platform Connect
- Shiji vs Spotnana
- Shiji vs Bokun
- Shiji vs FareHarbor
- Shiji vs Skyscanner
- Shiji vs Bookinglayer
- Shiji vs Expedia
- Shiji vs TicketingHub
- Shiji vs Apaleo
- Shiji vs Beds24
- Shiji vs DPGO
- Shiji vs Enso Connect
- Shiji vs RoomRaccoon
- Shiji vs Opera PMS
- Shiji vs Stayntouch
- Shiji vs Mews
- Shiji vs Protel
- Shiji vs Hotelogix
- Shiji vs WebRezPro
- Shiji vs Grab
- Shiji vs Careem
- Shiji vs IDeaS
- Shiji vs Chekin
- Shiji vs Tokeet
- Shiji vs TrustYou
- Shiji vs Bolt
- Shiji vs Lodgify
