LMS · head to head
Sana vs Skilljar

Sana
LMS
AI-native learning and knowledge assistant, acquired by Workday in 2025
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Skilljar
LMS
Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Sana workday completed its acquisition on 4 November 2025, so Sana is now an HCM vendor's capability; if you do not run Workday, the roadmap will be shaped around a platform you do not use and standalone availability is not guaranteed long term.; Skilljar pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- They diverge on capability: Sana covers Sana Agents, Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Sana and Skilljar actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Sana
- Sana Agents
- Sana Learn
- Enterprise search
- Live collaborative sessions
- Content generation
- Permission-aware retrieval
- Analytics
- Workday integration
Only in Skilljar
- Branded course catalogue
- CRM data write-back
- Certification with expiry
- Domain and theme control
- Self-paced and instructor-led
- Engagement analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Sana
- An organisation whose employees repeatedly ask the same policy and process questions in Slack and where the answer already exists in a document nobody findsnot Skilljar
- A Workday customer wanting learning and an internal assistant on the same employee record rather than a separate LMS contractnot Skilljar
- Onboarding at a fast-growing company where content goes stale faster than the training team can rewrite coursesnot Skilljar
- Sales enablement where reps need an answer about a product or a contract term during a call, not a course to complete next weeknot Skilljar
Skilljar
- A software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trainednot Sana
- Customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in Salesforcenot Sana
- Partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewednot Sana
- Reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementationnot Sana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Sana
- Workday completed its acquisition on 4 November 2025, so Sana is now an HCM vendor's capability; if you do not run Workday, the roadmap will be shaped around a platform you do not use and standalone availability is not guaranteed long term.
- Answer quality depends entirely on the state of your internal content, so an organisation with contradictory or outdated documents gets a confident assistant citing the wrong version, which is worse than not having one.
- Permission-aware retrieval across many source systems is difficult to get exactly right, and a misconfigured connector can surface content to employees who should not see it, which makes the security review substantial.
- Compliance-heavy training needs, such as certification tracking, regulator-mandated evidence and SCORM-based external content, are handled less thoroughly than in traditional learning management systems built for that purpose.
- Pricing is unpublished and now negotiated in the context of a Workday relationship, which reduces a non-Workday buyer's leverage and makes a like-for-like comparison against a standalone LMS difficult.
Skilljar
- Pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- The commercial value depends on the Salesforce integration being properly configured, and companies with messy CRM data get engagement reporting joined to accounts that do not reflect reality.
- It is built for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance means paying for capability that internal training does not need.
- Content authoring is not a strength, so most customers licence an authoring tool separately and run two content workflows.
- Attribution remains contested. The platform shows that trained accounts renew better, but establishing that training caused the renewal rather than that engaged customers train more is a problem the reporting cannot solve for you.
Pricing, plan by plan
Sana
On request- Sana$undefined/year
- Per-employee annual subscription
- Agents and Learn licensed together or separately depending on the agreement
- Connector scope affects pricing
Skilljar
On request- Skilljar$undefined/year
- Annual enterprise contract, quoted
- Entry point sits well above self-serve course platforms
- Implementation and integration services quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Sana if
- You need sana agents.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want sana learn.
Choose Skilljar if
- You need branded course catalogue.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want crm data write-back.
Questions people ask
- Is Sana or Skilljar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Sana starts at On request and Skilljar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Sana or Skilljar?
- Sana starts at On request and Skilljar at On request.
- Does Sana or Skilljar run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Sana best used for?
- Sana is most often used for an organisation whose employees repeatedly ask the same policy and process questions in slack and where the answer already exists in a document nobody finds, a workday customer wanting learning and an internal assistant on the same employee record rather than a separate lms contract, onboarding at a fast-growing company where content goes stale faster than the training team can rewrite courses, sales enablement where reps need an answer about a product or a contract term during a call, not a course to complete next week. Of those, an organisation whose employees repeatedly ask the same policy and process questions in slack and where the answer already exists in a document nobody finds and a workday customer wanting learning and an internal assistant on the same employee record rather than a separate lms contract are not what Skilljar is typically brought in for.
- What can Sana do that Skilljar cannot?
- Sana covers Sana Agents, Sana Learn, Enterprise search, Live collaborative sessions. Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, CRM data write-back, Certification with expiry, Domain and theme control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Sana: Is Sana still an independent company?
No. Workday completed its acquisition on 4 November 2025 for approximately $1.1bn; the integrated experience begins rolling out in 2026.
Skilljar: How is Skilljar different from a corporate LMS?
A corporate learning platform reports on employees for compliance. Skilljar reports on customers for retention and expansion, and writes that activity into the CRM so account teams see it.
Sana: Is it an LMS or a search tool?
Both, but the emphasis is on answering questions from your existing content. Traditional course delivery and completion tracking are secondary.
Skilljar: Do learners need accounts before they can browse?
No. Catalogues can be public so prospects and customers browse and enrol without a sales conversation, which is a large part of the self serve onboarding case.
Sana: Does it work if we are not a Workday customer?
Currently yes, but the product direction now serves Workday's platform strategy, so weigh that in a multi-year commitment.
Skilljar: Is it worth it for a small customer education team?
Usually not at the start. The contract floor assumes an established programme, so prove the value on a cheaper platform and move once retention or revenue evidence exists.
Sana: How is it priced?
Per employee per year, unpublished, and increasingly negotiated as part of a Workday agreement.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Sana vs Docebo
- Sana vs Degreed
- Sana vs Tovuti LMS
- Sana vs CYPHER Learning
- Sana vs LearnUpon
- Sana vs Absorb LMS
- Sana vs Sakai
- Sana vs Whatfix
- Sana vs Thought Industries
- Sana vs Kajabi
- Sana vs Teachable
- Sana vs Pear Deck
- Sana vs Totara
- Sana vs Coursera
- Sana vs LearnWorlds
- Sana vs Chamilo
- Sana vs Canvas
- Sana vs D2L Brightspace
- Sana vs Echo360
- Sana vs Edmodo
- Sana vs Edpuzzle
- Sana vs iSpring Learn
- Skilljar vs Docebo
- Skilljar vs Degreed
- Skilljar vs Tovuti LMS
- Skilljar vs CYPHER Learning
- Skilljar vs LearnUpon
- Skilljar vs Absorb LMS
- Skilljar vs Sakai
- Skilljar vs Whatfix
- Skilljar vs Thought Industries
- Skilljar vs Kajabi
- Skilljar vs Teachable
- Skilljar vs Pear Deck
- Skilljar vs Totara
- Skilljar vs Coursera
- Skilljar vs LearnWorlds
- Skilljar vs Chamilo
- Skilljar vs Canvas
- Skilljar vs D2L Brightspace
- Skilljar vs Echo360
- Skilljar vs Edmodo
- Skilljar vs Edpuzzle
- Skilljar vs iSpring Learn
