LMS · head to head
Degreed vs Skilljar

Degreed
LMS
Learning experience platform that indexes skills and third-party content rather than hosting courses
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Skilljar
LMS
Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Degreed pricing is entirely quote-based with no public rate card, and third parties report annual floors around 25,000 USD and licence minimums as high as 150 seats, so a mid-sized organisation frequently cannot buy it at any sensible price.; Skilljar pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- They diverge on capability: Degreed covers Content aggregation, Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Degreed and Skilljar actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Degreed
- Content aggregation
- Skills framework
- Pathways and plans
- Skill gap analytics
- Career mobility
- Learning records
- Academies
- Integrations with content providers
Only in Skilljar
- Branded course catalogue
- CRM data write-back
- Certification with expiry
- Domain and theme control
- Self-paced and instructor-led
- Engagement analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Degreed
- A large enterprise that already spends heavily on Coursera and LinkedIn Learning and cannot tell which of it is used or usefulnot Skilljar
- An organisation planning a workforce transition and needing a defensible view of which skills exist internally before it hires externallynot Skilljar
- A company running compliance training in an LMS that wants a separate, voluntary development experience employees actually choose to opennot Skilljar
- A group building internal mobility, matching people to open roles and stretch projects on evidenced skills rather than job titlesnot Skilljar
Skilljar
- A software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trainednot Degreed
- Customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in Salesforcenot Degreed
- Partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewednot Degreed
- Reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementationnot Degreed
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Degreed
- Pricing is entirely quote-based with no public rate card, and third parties report annual floors around 25,000 USD and licence minimums as high as 150 seats, so a mid-sized organisation frequently cannot buy it at any sensible price.
- Degreed is a layer, not a replacement: you keep paying for the learning management system that runs compliance training and for the content subscriptions it indexes, so the licence is a third line on top of two you already have.
- The skills data leans heavily on employee self-assessment, and self-rated skill is a weak signal; if managers do not validate ratings consistently the workforce capability picture that justified the purchase is not reliable enough to make hiring or redeployment decisions on.
- Adoption is voluntary in most deployments, so unless the organisation ties learning to something consequential, usage decays after the launch campaign and the platform becomes an expensive search box.
- Integrations with content providers vary in depth: some surface full metadata and completion write-back while others index only titles, so the unified record of learning the business case assumed can be patchy in exactly the sources employees use most.
Skilljar
- Pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
- The commercial value depends on the Salesforce integration being properly configured, and companies with messy CRM data get engagement reporting joined to accounts that do not reflect reality.
- It is built for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance means paying for capability that internal training does not need.
- Content authoring is not a strength, so most customers licence an authoring tool separately and run two content workflows.
- Attribution remains contested. The platform shows that trained accounts renew better, but establishing that training caused the renewal rather than that engaged customers train more is a problem the reporting cannot solve for you.
Pricing, plan by plan
Degreed
On request- Degreed for Enterprise$undefined/year
- Content aggregation across internal and third-party sources
- Skills framework and gap analytics
- Pathways, plans and academies
- Degreed Free (individual)Free
- Personal learning profile
- Track learning from any source
- For individuals rather than organisations
Skilljar
On request- Skilljar$undefined/year
- Annual enterprise contract, quoted
- Entry point sits well above self-serve course platforms
- Implementation and integration services quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Degreed if
- You need content aggregation.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want skills framework.
Choose Skilljar if
- You need branded course catalogue.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want crm data write-back.
Questions people ask
- Is Degreed or Skilljar better?
- Neither clearly leads. Degreed starts at On request and Skilljar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Degreed or Skilljar?
- Degreed starts at On request and Skilljar at On request.
- Does Degreed or Skilljar run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Degreed best used for?
- Degreed is most often used for a large enterprise that already spends heavily on coursera and linkedin learning and cannot tell which of it is used or useful, an organisation planning a workforce transition and needing a defensible view of which skills exist internally before it hires externally, a company running compliance training in an lms that wants a separate, voluntary development experience employees actually choose to open, a group building internal mobility, matching people to open roles and stretch projects on evidenced skills rather than job titles. Of those, a large enterprise that already spends heavily on coursera and linkedin learning and cannot tell which of it is used or useful and an organisation planning a workforce transition and needing a defensible view of which skills exist internally before it hires externally are not what Skilljar is typically brought in for.
- What can Degreed do that Skilljar cannot?
- Degreed covers Content aggregation, Skills framework, Pathways and plans, Skill gap analytics. Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, CRM data write-back, Certification with expiry, Domain and theme control.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Degreed: Does Degreed replace our LMS?
No. It is a discovery and skills layer over content. Compliance training, assignment and certification records generally stay in the LMS, and you pay for both.
Skilljar: How is Skilljar different from a corporate LMS?
A corporate learning platform reports on employees for compliance. Skilljar reports on customers for retention and expansion, and writes that activity into the CRM so account teams see it.
Degreed: What does Degreed cost?
It is quote-only. Third-party reports put annual floors around 25,000 USD with licence minimums that can reach 150 seats.
Skilljar: Do learners need accounts before they can browse?
No. Catalogues can be public so prospects and customers browse and enrol without a sales conversation, which is a large part of the self serve onboarding case.
Degreed: Is the skills data trustworthy?
Only as far as your validation process is. It is built on self-assessment plus peer endorsement, so without manager validation it should not drive redeployment decisions.
Skilljar: Is it worth it for a small customer education team?
Usually not at the start. The contract floor assumes an established programme, so prove the value on a cheaper platform and move once retention or revenue evidence exists.
Degreed: Can individuals use it free?
Yes, Degreed offers a free personal profile for tracking your own learning, separate from the enterprise product.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Degreed vs Docebo
- Degreed vs Sana
- Degreed vs Totara
- Degreed vs Tovuti LMS
- Degreed vs LearnDash
- Degreed vs Cornerstone Learning
- Degreed vs Sakai
- Degreed vs Whatfix
- Degreed vs Chamilo
- Degreed vs Cornerstone OnDemand
- Degreed vs Echo360
- Degreed vs LearnUpon
- Degreed vs Podia
- Degreed vs Udacity
- Degreed vs Pear Deck
- Degreed vs Seesaw
- Degreed vs Absorb LMS
- Degreed vs LearnWorlds
- Degreed vs Thought Industries
- Degreed vs CYPHER Learning
- Degreed vs Canvas
- Degreed vs D2L Brightspace
- Degreed vs Edmodo
- Degreed vs Edpuzzle
- Degreed vs iSpring Learn
- Skilljar vs Docebo
- Skilljar vs Sana
- Skilljar vs Totara
- Skilljar vs Tovuti LMS
- Skilljar vs LearnDash
- Skilljar vs Cornerstone Learning
- Skilljar vs Sakai
- Skilljar vs Whatfix
- Skilljar vs Chamilo
- Skilljar vs Cornerstone OnDemand
- Skilljar vs Echo360
- Skilljar vs LearnUpon
- Skilljar vs Podia
- Skilljar vs Udacity
- Skilljar vs Pear Deck
- Skilljar vs Seesaw
- Skilljar vs Absorb LMS
- Skilljar vs LearnWorlds
- Skilljar vs Thought Industries
- Skilljar vs CYPHER Learning
- Skilljar vs Canvas
- Skilljar vs D2L Brightspace
- Skilljar vs Edmodo
- Skilljar vs Edpuzzle
- Skilljar vs iSpring Learn
