Softwr

LMS · head to head

Echo360 vs Skilljar

Echo360 logo

Echo360

LMS

Lecture capture, video management, polling and exam authoring for universities

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite
Skilljar logo

Skilljar

LMS

Customer education platform that treats training completion as a commercial signal in the CRM

From
On request
Rated
-
Full reviewWebsite

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Echo360 no pricing is published for any component, so institutions cannot benchmark before entering a procurement, and the eventual figure depends on negotiated enrolment bands that vary widely between comparable universities.; Skilljar pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
  • They diverge on capability: Echo360 covers Scheduled lecture capture, Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Echo360 and Skilljar actually diverge.

Attributes where Echo360 and Skilljar differ
AttributeEcho360Skilljar
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, Windows, macOSWeb, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (LMS).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Echo360

  • Scheduled lecture capture
  • Automatic transcription and search
  • EchoEngage polling
  • EchoExam
  • GoReact video assessment
  • LMS integration
  • Student notes and interaction

Only in Skilljar

  • Branded course catalogue
  • CRM data write-back
  • Certification with expiry
  • Domain and theme control
  • Self-paced and instructor-led

Both cover

  • Engagement analytics

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Echo360

  • A university with a legal obligation to caption teaching material, where automatic transcription across every recorded lecture is cheaper than commissioning captions per modulenot Skilljar
  • A department wanting to see which students stopped watching recordings before a failure point, and to act on it before the examnot Skilljar
  • A teacher training or nursing programme that needs time-stamped assessor feedback on student performance video, which GoReact is built fornot Skilljar
  • An institution replacing an ageing clicker estate and wanting polling on the same contract as lecture capture rather than a second vendornot Skilljar

Skilljar

  • A software company whose support ticket volume is driven by customers who were never trainednot Echo360
  • Customer success teams that want training engagement visible next to renewal risk in Salesforcenot Echo360
  • Partner certification programmes where credentials must expire and be renewednot Echo360
  • Reducing time to first value during onboarding by giving customers self serve training before implementationnot Echo360

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Echo360

  • No pricing is published for any component, so institutions cannot benchmark before entering a procurement, and the eventual figure depends on negotiated enrolment bands that vary widely between comparable universities.
  • The catalogue is assembled from mergers and acquisitions including Turning Technologies and GoReact, so the bundle is not one product: components differ in codebase, support and roadmap attention, and integration between them is uneven.
  • Room capture hardware and installation are priced separately from the software licence and often exceed it in year one, which is regularly missed in budget submissions that only cover the subscription.
  • Private equity ownership through Centre Lane Partners means roadmap and pricing decisions answer to an investment thesis, and universities on multi-year contracts have limited leverage if the strategy changes mid-term.
  • Automatic transcription accuracy on technical lecture content, accented speakers and poor room audio falls well short of what an accessibility obligation strictly requires, so institutions relying on it for compliance usually still pay for human correction on a subset of courses.

Skilljar

  • Pricing is an enterprise annual commitment, so a first certification pilot costs more than it can demonstrate and teams should prove the programme elsewhere first.
  • The commercial value depends on the Salesforce integration being properly configured, and companies with messy CRM data get engagement reporting joined to accounts that do not reflect reality.
  • It is built for external audiences, so using it for internal employee compliance means paying for capability that internal training does not need.
  • Content authoring is not a strength, so most customers licence an authoring tool separately and run two content workflows.
  • Attribution remains contested. The platform shows that trained accounts renew better, but establishing that training caused the renewal rather than that engaged customers train more is a problem the reporting cannot solve for you.

Pricing, plan by plan

Echo360

On request
  • EchoVideo$undefined/year
    • Lecture capture, transcription, streaming and analytics
    • Institution-wide licence, quoted
    • Room hardware and installation priced separately
  • EchoEngage$undefined/year
    • Polling and audience response including PointSolutions
    • Quoted, sometimes with student-paid licences
  • EchoExam and EchoInk$undefined/year
    • Assessment authoring and interactive content
    • Quoted as bundle components
  • GoReact$undefined/year
    • Video-based skill assessment
    • Sold per programme or institution-wide, quoted

Skilljar

On request
  • Skilljar$undefined/year
    • Annual enterprise contract, quoted
    • Entry point sits well above self-serve course platforms
    • Implementation and integration services quoted separately

Which should you pick?

Choose Echo360 if

  • You need scheduled lecture capture.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS.
  • You also want automatic transcription and search.
Echo360 review

Choose Skilljar if

  • You need branded course catalogue.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android.
  • You also want crm data write-back.
Skilljar review

Questions people ask

Is Echo360 or Skilljar better?
Neither clearly leads. Echo360 starts at On request and Skilljar at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Echo360 or Skilljar?
Echo360 starts at On request and Skilljar at On request.
Does Echo360 or Skilljar run on more platforms?
Echo360 runs on Web, iOS, Android, Windows, macOS. Skilljar runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is Echo360 best used for?
Echo360 is most often used for a university with a legal obligation to caption teaching material, where automatic transcription across every recorded lecture is cheaper than commissioning captions per module, a department wanting to see which students stopped watching recordings before a failure point, and to act on it before the exam, a teacher training or nursing programme that needs time-stamped assessor feedback on student performance video, which goreact is built for, an institution replacing an ageing clicker estate and wanting polling on the same contract as lecture capture rather than a second vendor. Of those, a university with a legal obligation to caption teaching material, where automatic transcription across every recorded lecture is cheaper than commissioning captions per module and a department wanting to see which students stopped watching recordings before a failure point, and to act on it before the exam are not what Skilljar is typically brought in for.
What can Echo360 do that Skilljar cannot?
Echo360 covers Scheduled lecture capture, Automatic transcription and search, EchoEngage polling, EchoExam. Skilljar covers Branded course catalogue, CRM data write-back, Certification with expiry, Domain and theme control. Both handle Engagement analytics.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Echo360: Does Echo360 publish pricing?

No. Every component is quoted, generally as an institution-wide annual licence banded by enrolment, with hardware and installation separate.

Skilljar: How is Skilljar different from a corporate LMS?

A corporate learning platform reports on employees for compliance. Skilljar reports on customers for retention and expansion, and writes that activity into the CRM so account teams see it.

Echo360: Is automatic captioning good enough for accessibility compliance?

Not on its own for high-stakes use. Automatic transcription handles search and general access well, but technical vocabulary and poor room audio degrade it, and most institutions budget for human correction where a formal accommodation exists.

Skilljar: Do learners need accounts before they can browse?

No. Catalogues can be public so prospects and customers browse and enrol without a sales conversation, which is a large part of the self serve onboarding case.

Echo360: What did the Turning Technologies merger bring?

The polling and clicker business, now sold as EchoEngage and PointSolutions, which is why polling appears alongside lecture capture on one contract.

Skilljar: Is it worth it for a small customer education team?

Usually not at the start. The contract floor assumes an established programme, so prove the value on a cheaper platform and move once retention or revenue evidence exists.

Echo360: Is GoReact sold separately?

Yes. GoReact can be bought on its own for a programme such as teacher training, or as part of the wider Echo360 bundle.

Share

Related pages

More on Echo360

More on Skilljar

Keep looking

Other head to heads