Is Phocas or Quid better?

Neither clearly leads. Phocas starts at On request and Quid at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Phocas or Quid?

Phocas starts at On request and Quid at On request.

Does Phocas or Quid run on more platforms?

Phocas runs on Web, iOS, Android. Quid runs on Web.

What is Phocas best used for?

Phocas is most often used for a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer, a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet, a multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal bi team, a private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different erps. Of those, a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer and a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet are not what Quid is typically brought in for.

What can Phocas do that Quid cannot?

Phocas covers ERP connectors, Pre-built distribution content, Grid-first analysis, Financial statements. Quid covers Social listening, Network analysis, Non-social data sets, Quid Terminal.

Business Intelligence · head to head

Phocas vs Quid

Phocas

Business Intelligence

Pre-built BI and FP&A for wholesale distributors and manufacturers running mid-market ERPs

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Quid

Business Intelligence

Consumer and market intelligence combining social listening with unstructured text network analysis

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Phocas the value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.; Quid the company has changed name twice, from NetBase to NetBase Quid to Quid, which fragments documentation, third-party comparisons and support material across three brand identities and makes older guidance unreliable.
They diverge on capability: Phocas covers ERP connectors, Quid covers Social listening.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Phocas and Quid actually diverge.

Attributes where Phocas and Quid differ
Attribute	Phocas	Quid
Platforms	Web, iOS, Android	Web

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Business Intelligence).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Phocas

ERP connectors
Pre-built distribution content
Grid-first analysis
Financial statements
Budgets and forecasts
Rebates module
Alerts and subscriptions
Mobile apps

Only in Quid

Social listening
Network analysis
Non-social data sets
Quid Terminal
Quid Monitor
AI agents
Image analytics
API access

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Phocas

A wholesale distributor on Prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writernot Quid
A manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheetnot Quid
A multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal BI teamnot Quid
A private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different ERPsnot Quid

Quid

A corporate strategy team mapping which technology clusters in a patent set are accelerating and which companies own them, before an acquisition decisionnot Phocas
A consumer insights function that wants to know what themes drive negative sentiment about a category rather than counting mentions of its own brandnot Phocas
An innovation group scanning research literature and startup activity for adjacent white space it has no internal expertise innot Phocas
A brand tracking how a reputational incident propagates across news, social and forums with sentiment broken down by theme rather than by channelnot Phocas

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Phocas

The value is the pre-built vertical content, so a company outside distribution, manufacturing or retail pays premium prices for dashboards it must build itself anyway.
If your ERP is not on the maintained connector list you fall back to generic database extraction and lose the fast time to value that justifies the price.
The visualisation library is thin next to Power BI or Tableau, and analysts who want fine control over chart design will find it constraining.
Pricing is quoted per user and never published, and buyers routinely report large gaps between initial and renewal quotes with limited comparison leverage.
Modules are licensed separately, so a customer who bought Analytics and later wants Financial Statements or Rebates faces a new negotiation rather than an upgrade.

Quid

The company has changed name twice, from NetBase to NetBase Quid to Quid, which fragments documentation, third-party comparisons and support material across three brand identities and makes older guidance unreliable.
Nothing is published on price and contracts sit well above ordinary listening tools, so the evaluation cost is high before you know whether the network analysis will actually be used.
The network maps require an analyst who knows how to interpret them; teams without a dedicated insights person tend to use the platform as an expensive listening tool and never touch the capability they paid for.
Historical data depth and source coverage are scoped per contract rather than included, so a question that needs five years of back data can require a contract amendment mid-project.
Social platform access is subject to the same API restrictions that affect every listening vendor, and coverage of closed networks is thinner than the marketing implies, which matters if your category lives in private communities.

Pricing, plan by plan

Phocas

On request

Phocas$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by user count and modules
- Analytics, Financial Statements, Budgets and Rebates licensed separately
- One-off implementation and ERP connector setup fee

Quid

On request

Quid$undefined/year
- Quid Terminal analyst workspace
- Social listening and sentiment
- Network analysis over patents, filings, news and research

Which should you pick?

Choose Phocas if

You need erp connectors.
You work on Web, iOS, Android.
You also want pre-built distribution content.

Phocas review

Choose Quid if

You need social listening.
You also want network analysis.

Quid review

Questions people ask

Is Phocas or Quid better?: Neither clearly leads. Phocas starts at On request and Quid at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Phocas or Quid?: Phocas starts at On request and Quid at On request.
Does Phocas or Quid run on more platforms?: Phocas runs on Web, iOS, Android. Quid runs on Web.
What is Phocas best used for?: Phocas is most often used for a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer, a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet, a multi-branch retailer comparing branch and product performance daily without an internal bi team, a private equity owner standardising reporting across several acquired distributors on different erps. Of those, a wholesale distributor on prophet 21 whose sales reps need per-customer margin and stock availability without waiting on a report writer and a manufacturer that wants budgeting on the same data as its sales analysis rather than in a separate spreadsheet are not what Quid is typically brought in for.
What can Phocas do that Quid cannot?: Phocas covers ERP connectors, Pre-built distribution content, Grid-first analysis, Financial statements. Quid covers Social listening, Network analysis, Non-social data sets, Quid Terminal.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Phocas: What does Phocas cost?

Nothing is published. It is quoted annually by user count and module, with a separate implementation fee, and varies by region.

Quid: Is this the same company as NetBase?

Yes. NetBase and Quid merged in 2020, traded as NetBase Quid, and now sell under the single Quid brand.

Phocas: Is it worth it over Power BI?

Only if you are in its target verticals on a supported ERP. Power BI is far cheaper per seat but you supply the data model.

Quid: Is it a social listening tool?

It includes social listening, but the reason to buy it is the network analysis over patents, filings, news and research. If you only need social listening, cheaper tools cover it.

Phocas: Does it replace my ERP reporting?

It replaces day-to-day analysis and sales reporting. Transactional and statutory reporting stays in the ERP.

Quid: What does it cost?

Not published. Expect an annual enterprise contract priced by seats, data sources and historical depth.

Phocas: Can it do budgeting?

Yes, through a separately licensed Financial Statements and Budgets module on the same warehouse.

Quid: Who uses it day to day?

Corporate insights, strategy and innovation analysts more often than social media managers. It rewards someone trained in analysis.

Phocas vs Quid

Phocas

Quid

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in Phocas

Only in Quid

What people use each for

Phocas

Quid

Where each one falls short

Phocas

Quid

Pricing, plan by plan

Phocas

Quid

Which should you pick?

Choose Phocas if

Choose Quid if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Phocas

More on Quid

Keep looking

Other head to heads