Cybersecurity · head to head
Proofpoint vs Shufti Pro

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proofpoint and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proofpoint | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $6/month | On request |
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Email, Cloud, Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 2002 | Unknown |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot Shufti Pro
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot Shufti Pro
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot Shufti Pro
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot Proofpoint
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot Proofpoint
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot Proofpoint
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot Proofpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is Proofpoint or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proofpoint starts at $6/month and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proofpoint or Shufti Pro?
- Proofpoint starts at $6/month and Shufti Pro at On request.
- Does Proofpoint or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Proofpoint best used for?
- Proofpoint is most often used for a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three, an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards, concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policy, retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internally. Of those, a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three and an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can Proofpoint do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
Proofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Sumsub
- Proofpoint vs Jumio
- Proofpoint vs Veriff
- Proofpoint vs iDenfy
- Proofpoint vs Socure
- Proofpoint vs IDnow
- Proofpoint vs Trulioo
- Proofpoint vs Yoti
- Proofpoint vs Quantexa
- Proofpoint vs Fenergo
- Proofpoint vs NICE Actimize
- Proofpoint vs Signicat
- Proofpoint vs Keeper Password Manager
- Proofpoint vs Keygen
- Proofpoint vs KnowBe4
- Proofpoint vs Legit Security
- Proofpoint vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Proofpoint vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Shufti Pro vs Norton 360
- Shufti Pro vs 1Password
- Shufti Pro vs LastPass
- Shufti Pro vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Shufti Pro vs Mimecast
- Shufti Pro vs Qualys VMDR
- Shufti Pro vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Shufti Pro vs IBM QRadar
- Shufti Pro vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Shufti Pro vs VMware Carbon Black
- Shufti Pro vs Sysdig
- Shufti Pro vs Dahua Technology
- Shufti Pro vs Descope
- Shufti Pro vs Drata
- Shufti Pro vs DTiQ
- Shufti Pro vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Shufti Pro vs ExpressVPN
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
