Cybersecurity · head to head
IBM QRadar vs Shufti Pro

IBM QRadar
Cybersecurity
Enterprise SIEM licensed by events per second, whose cloud business IBM sold to Palo Alto Networks in 2024.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: IBM QRadar iBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which IBM QRadar and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | IBM QRadar | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | quote |
| Platforms | Web, Api | Web, iOS, Android |
| Founded | 1911 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in IBM QRadar
- Offence model
- Network flow analysis
- Device Support Modules
- Ariel query language
- Rules and building blocks
- Deployment topology
- App Exchange
- Use Case Manager
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
IBM QRadar
- A regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared SaaS SIEMnot Shufti Pro
- A SOC that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an NDR product separatelynot Shufti Pro
- An existing QRadar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platformnot Shufti Pro
- Compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reportingnot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot IBM QRadar
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot IBM QRadar
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot IBM QRadar
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot IBM QRadar
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
IBM QRadar
- IBM sold the QRadar SaaS business to Palo Alto Networks in 2024 and those customers are being moved to Cortex XSIAM, so anyone buying today is choosing an on-premises product whose vendor has publicly moved the cloud future to a competitor, and the support horizon becomes a contract negotiation rather than an assumption.
- Licensing is by events per second and flows per minute, so every additional log source raises the cost directly and teams routinely exclude verbose sources such as DNS, proxy, endpoint and cloud audit logs to stay under the licence, which strips out exactly the data an investigation later needs.
- It needs a dedicated operator: rule tuning, parser work and offence triage are continuous jobs, and an organisation that deploys QRadar without at least one named engineer accumulates thousands of unreviewed offences and a false sense of coverage.
- A log source without a matching Device Support Module arrives unparsed, and writing a custom parser with regular expressions against an unfamiliar payload format is specialist work that can take days per source, which quietly determines which systems ever get monitored.
- On-premises capacity is planned across consoles, processors, collectors and data nodes, so outgrowing the sizing means procuring and racking more appliances rather than changing a subscription tier, and growth becomes a purchasing cycle measured in months.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
IBM QRadar
On request- QRadar SIEMFree
- Event and flow processing
- Offense management
- Threat intelligence
- QRadar CloudFree
- Cloud-native deployment
- Elastic scaling
- Managed infrastructure
- QRadar SuiteFree
- SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- Unified analyst experience
- Federated search
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose IBM QRadar if
- You need offence model.
- You work on Web, Api.
- You also want network flow analysis.
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is IBM QRadar or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. IBM QRadar starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, IBM QRadar or Shufti Pro?
- IBM QRadar starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request.
- Does IBM QRadar or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- IBM QRadar runs on Web, Api. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is IBM QRadar best used for?
- IBM QRadar is most often used for a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem, a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately, an existing qradar estate deciding whether to stay on premises or accept the migration path to a different vendor's platform, compliance-driven log retention and reporting where the audit requirement is specific about collection, retention and reporting. Of those, a regulated enterprise that must keep log data on premises or in a specific jurisdiction and cannot use a shared saas siem and a soc that wants log correlation and network flow analysis in one platform rather than buying an ndr product separately are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can IBM QRadar do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- IBM QRadar covers Offence model, Network flow analysis, Device Support Modules, Ariel query language. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
IBM QRadar: Who owns QRadar now?
It is split. IBM sold the QRadar SaaS assets to Palo Alto Networks in a deal announced in May 2024 and closed that September, and those customers are being migrated to Cortex XSIAM. IBM retains and supports the on-premises product.
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
IBM QRadar: Is QRadar being discontinued?
IBM has committed to continuing support for on-premises customers, including security updates, while offering migration assistance. The cloud product's future belongs to Palo Alto. If you are signing a multi-year term, get the support horizon written into the contract.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
IBM QRadar: How is it licensed?
By events per second for logs and flows per minute for network data, with the software or appliance sized to that rate. Add-on modules in the suite are licensed separately.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
IBM QRadar: What is an offence?
QRadar's term for a correlated case. Rules group related events and flows against a common indicator such as a host or user, so an analyst reviews one offence rather than the hundreds of events behind it.
IBM QRadar: Do I need a full-time engineer?
In practice yes for anything beyond a small deployment. Parser development, rule tuning and offence triage do not stop, and the most common failure mode is a well-installed QRadar that nobody has tuned since go-live.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- IBM QRadar vs Bitdefender Total Security
- IBM QRadar vs 1Password
- IBM QRadar vs Norton 360
- IBM QRadar vs LastPass
- IBM QRadar vs Microsoft Sentinel
- IBM QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- IBM QRadar vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- IBM QRadar vs LogRhythm SIEM
- IBM QRadar vs Recorded Future
- IBM QRadar vs SentinelOne Singularity
- IBM QRadar vs Proofpoint
- IBM QRadar vs Trend Micro Vision One
- IBM QRadar vs Arnica
- IBM QRadar vs Authelia
- IBM QRadar vs Authy
- IBM QRadar vs Baffle
- IBM QRadar vs Beyond Identity
- IBM QRadar vs BeyondTrust
- IBM QRadar vs Sumsub
- IBM QRadar vs Jumio
- IBM QRadar vs Veriff
- IBM QRadar vs iDenfy
- IBM QRadar vs Socure
- IBM QRadar vs IDnow
- IBM QRadar vs Trulioo
- IBM QRadar vs Yoti
- IBM QRadar vs Quantexa
- IBM QRadar vs Fenergo
- IBM QRadar vs NICE Actimize
- IBM QRadar vs Signicat
- IBM QRadar vs Keeper Password Manager
- IBM QRadar vs Keygen
- IBM QRadar vs KnowBe4
- IBM QRadar vs Legit Security
- IBM QRadar vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Shufti Pro vs 1Password
- Shufti Pro vs Norton 360
- Shufti Pro vs LastPass
- Shufti Pro vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Shufti Pro vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Shufti Pro vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Recorded Future
- Shufti Pro vs SentinelOne Singularity
- Shufti Pro vs Proofpoint
- Shufti Pro vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Shufti Pro vs Arnica
- Shufti Pro vs Authelia
- Shufti Pro vs Authy
- Shufti Pro vs Baffle
- Shufti Pro vs Beyond Identity
- Shufti Pro vs BeyondTrust
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
