Cybersecurity · head to head
Proofpoint vs VMware Carbon Black

Proofpoint
Cybersecurity
Email security and data protection suite from a private company owned by Thoma Bravo, licensed per user with modules sold separately.
- From
- $6/month
- Rated
- -
VMware Carbon Black
Cybersecurity
Cloud-delivered endpoint protection and EDR, now owned by Broadcom and positioned alongside Symantec.
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Proofpoint licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.; VMware Carbon Black broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- They diverge on capability: Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Proofpoint and VMware Carbon Black actually diverge.
| Attribute | Proofpoint | VMware Carbon Black |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $6/month | On request |
| Platforms | Email, Cloud, Web | Desktop, Api |
Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity), founded (2002).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Proofpoint
- Inline secure email gateway
- Attachment sandboxing
- URL rewriting and click-time analysis
- Threat Response Auto-Pull
- Email Fraud Defense
- Security awareness training
- Insider Threat Management
- Enterprise DLP
Only in VMware Carbon Black
- Endpoint Standard
- Enterprise EDR
- Audit and Remediation
- Single sensor
- Live Response
- Workload protection
- Container security
- Watchlists and feeds
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Proofpoint
- A regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, DMARC enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all threenot VMware Carbon Black
- An organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwardsnot VMware Carbon Black
- Concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policynot VMware Carbon Black
- Retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internallynot VMware Carbon Black
VMware Carbon Black
- A SOC that wants unfiltered endpoint telemetry to hunt over rather than only vendor-generated alertsnot Proofpoint
- A vSphere estate that wants workload protection deployed through the hypervisor instead of installing an agent in every guestnot Proofpoint
- Replacing signature antivirus after an incident where the incumbent product had no record of what the attacker didnot Proofpoint
- An organisation already inside a Broadcom or Symantec enterprise agreement that can consolidate endpoint onto an existing contractnot Proofpoint
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Proofpoint
- Licensing is per user per year with each capability as a separate stock item, so the platform shown in a proof of concept is normally several products, and adding awareness training, data loss prevention or insider threat monitoring later is a fresh negotiation rather than enabling a feature.
- It sits inline with MX records pointed at it, so any service degradation is a mail outage for the entire organisation, and both migrating on and migrating off are cutovers with queueing, rollback planning and a real risk of message loss.
- Most customers on Microsoft 365 E5 or Google Workspace Enterprise are already paying for native filtering, so Proofpoint is a second licence layered over a capability the organisation owns, and that comparison is raised by finance at every single renewal.
- The administration console carries a decade of acquisitions: the classic gateway policy routes and filters do not share a model with the newer module interfaces, rule evaluation is order-sensitive in ways that surprise untrained administrators, and mistakes there silently change what is delivered.
- Quarantine management is a standing helpdesk workload because legitimate bulk mail, invoices and supplier notifications are held, and unless end-user digests are configured and users are taught to use them, the security team becomes the mail release desk.
VMware Carbon Black
- Broadcom's enterprise model concentrates direct sales and support on its largest accounts and moves everyone else to resellers, so a mid-size customer can lose named support contacts and face a substantially repriced renewal with limited notice.
- Continuous EDR recording is retained for a defined window and longer retention is a paid tier, so the investigation you most need is often the one whose telemetry has already aged out, and that is discovered during the incident rather than before it.
- The product assumes an operator: watchlists, policy tuning and alert triage are ongoing work, and organisations without a dedicated analyst or an MDR contract typically leave policies in monitor mode and pay for telemetry that is never reviewed.
- The sensor operates in the same kernel and file-filter territory as other endpoint agents, so running it alongside an incumbent antivirus, DLP or backup agent commonly produces performance complaints and requires maintained exclusion lists on both sides.
- Linux sensor support is tied to specific distribution and kernel versions, so a routine operating system upgrade can leave hosts without a supported sensor until a matching build ships, and anything outside the supported list gets no coverage at all.
Pricing, plan by plan
Proofpoint
$6/month- Email Protection$6/month
- Per user
- Advanced threat detection
- Data loss prevention
- Compliance$8/month
- All Email Protection
- Archive & search
- eDiscovery
- Advanced Threat$10/month
- All Compliance features
- Targeted attack detection
- Behavior analytics
VMware Carbon Black
On request- CB Endpoint StandardFree
- NGAV
- Behavioral EDR
- Device control
- CB Endpoint AdvancedFree
- All Standard features
- Threat hunting
- Audit and remediation
- CB Endpoint EnterpriseFree
- All Advanced features
- Advanced threat hunting
- Live response
Which should you pick?
Choose Proofpoint if
- You need inline secure email gateway.
- You work on Email, Cloud, Web.
- You also want attachment sandboxing.
Choose VMware Carbon Black if
- You need endpoint standard.
- You work on Desktop, Api.
- You also want enterprise edr.
Questions people ask
- Is Proofpoint or VMware Carbon Black better?
- Neither clearly leads. Proofpoint starts at $6/month and VMware Carbon Black at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Proofpoint or VMware Carbon Black?
- Proofpoint starts at $6/month and VMware Carbon Black at On request.
- Does Proofpoint or VMware Carbon Black run on more platforms?
- Proofpoint runs on Email, Cloud, Web. VMware Carbon Black runs on Desktop, Api.
- What is Proofpoint best used for?
- Proofpoint is most often used for a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three, an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards, concentrating stronger controls and training on the specific individuals who actually receive targeted attacks rather than applying uniform policy, retracting a phishing message from thousands of mailboxes after the verdict changes, including copies that were forwarded internally. Of those, a regulated organisation that needs a filtering layer, dmarc enforcement and archiving with an auditable trail across all three and an organisation that suffered a business email compromise and must show its board a control that stops delivery rather than remediating afterwards are not what VMware Carbon Black is typically brought in for.
- What can Proofpoint do that VMware Carbon Black cannot?
- Proofpoint covers Inline secure email gateway, Attachment sandboxing, URL rewriting and click-time analysis, Threat Response Auto-Pull. VMware Carbon Black covers Endpoint Standard, Enterprise EDR, Audit and Remediation, Single sensor.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Proofpoint: Does it replace Microsoft Defender for Office 365?
Functionally it overlaps heavily, and running both means paying twice for filtering. Most Proofpoint customers on Microsoft 365 keep Defender licensed because it is bundled in E5 and use Proofpoint as the inline gateway. Expect to justify that duplication annually.
VMware Carbon Black: Who owns Carbon Black now?
Broadcom. It acquired VMware in November 2023, and Carbon Black now sits in Broadcom's enterprise security business alongside Symantec. VMware branding is being phased out.
Proofpoint: Who owns Proofpoint?
Thoma Bravo, a private equity firm, which took the company private in 2021. It has continued to acquire since, including Tessian, Normalyze and Hornetsecurity, which is why the portfolio spans so many adjacent categories.
VMware Carbon Black: Why do the docs use names I do not recognise?
The product has been renamed repeatedly. CB Defense is now Endpoint Standard, CB ThreatHunter is Enterprise EDR and CB LiveOps is Audit and Remediation. Older community answers and runbooks still use the previous names.
Proofpoint: Do I have to change my MX records?
For the gateway, yes. That is what makes it inline and able to block before delivery. Some newer capabilities integrate through the mailbox API instead, but the core protection model is MX-level.
VMware Carbon Black: Does it replace my existing antivirus?
Yes on supported Windows, macOS and Linux versions, and running it alongside another antivirus is not recommended because the two agents contend for the same hooks. Check your compliance requirements, as some auditors still ask for a named antivirus product.
Proofpoint: Is security awareness training included?
No, it is a separate subscription. It integrates well with the threat data, so training can target the users actually being attacked, but it is a distinct line item on the quote.
VMware Carbon Black: Do I need a full-time analyst to run it?
To get value from Enterprise EDR, effectively yes. The prevention tier can run with part-time attention, but the hunting and recording capability is only worth its cost if somebody is querying it, which is why many customers buy it through an MDR provider.
Proofpoint: What does Threat Response Auto-Pull actually do?
It removes messages from mailboxes after delivery when the verdict changes, including copies that users forwarded internally. It is the answer to the case where a link was clean at delivery and weaponised an hour later.
VMware Carbon Black: How is it licensed?
Per endpoint, per year, with the capability tier determining the rate and workload and container protection priced separately. Extended EDR data retention is an additional line item.
Related pages
More on VMware Carbon Black
Other head to heads
- Proofpoint vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Proofpoint vs Norton 360
- Proofpoint vs 1Password
- Proofpoint vs LastPass
- Proofpoint vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Proofpoint vs Mimecast
- Proofpoint vs Qualys VMDR
- Proofpoint vs Zscaler Internet Access
- Proofpoint vs IBM QRadar
- Proofpoint vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Proofpoint vs Sysdig
- Proofpoint vs Dahua Technology
- Proofpoint vs Descope
- Proofpoint vs Drata
- Proofpoint vs DTiQ
- Proofpoint vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Proofpoint vs ExpressVPN
- Proofpoint vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- Proofpoint vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- Proofpoint vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Proofpoint vs SentinelOne
- Proofpoint vs Sophos Intercept X
- Proofpoint vs Falco
- Proofpoint vs SentinelOne Singularity
- VMware Carbon Black vs Bitdefender Total Security
- VMware Carbon Black vs Norton 360
- VMware Carbon Black vs 1Password
- VMware Carbon Black vs LastPass
- VMware Carbon Black vs Trend Micro Vision One
- VMware Carbon Black vs Mimecast
- VMware Carbon Black vs Qualys VMDR
- VMware Carbon Black vs Zscaler Internet Access
- VMware Carbon Black vs IBM QRadar
- VMware Carbon Black vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sysdig
- VMware Carbon Black vs Dahua Technology
- VMware Carbon Black vs Descope
- VMware Carbon Black vs Drata
- VMware Carbon Black vs DTiQ
- VMware Carbon Black vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- VMware Carbon Black vs ExpressVPN
- VMware Carbon Black vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
- VMware Carbon Black vs Cybereason Defense Platform
- VMware Carbon Black vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne
- VMware Carbon Black vs Sophos Intercept X
- VMware Carbon Black vs Falco
- VMware Carbon Black vs SentinelOne Singularity
