Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Prodsmart

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Prodsmart
Manufacturing
Mobile manufacturing execution for small plants, acquired by Autodesk and folded into Fusion Operations
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Prodsmart the product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Prodsmart actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Prodsmart
- Mobile shop floor declarations
- No controller integration required
- Traceability
- Live production status
- Basic OEE
- Maintenance records
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Prodsmart
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Prodsmart
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Prodsmart
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Prodsmart
Prodsmart
- A small manufacturer with older machines that cannot be connected to any network without a costly retrofitnot Augury
- A plant that needs lot traceability for a customer or regulatory audit and currently keeps it on papernot Augury
- A shop wanting live work order status without installing terminals and cabling on the floornot Augury
- An Autodesk Fusion user looking for an operations layer from the same vendor as its CAD and CAMnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Prodsmart
- The product has been absorbed into the Autodesk Fusion family, so the standalone brand, pricing page and channel that earlier reviews describe no longer reflect how it is bought, and buyers must evaluate the current Autodesk packaging instead.
- All data originates from operator declarations, so accuracy depends entirely on shop floor discipline, and a plant that cannot enforce scanning gets confident charts built on incomplete input.
- Because it reads nothing from machines, it cannot detect a stoppage the operator does not report, which means downtime analysis captures what people admit to rather than what happened.
- Scheduling and planning are shallow compared with a full MES or ERP, so most customers still plan elsewhere and use Prodsmart for execution only.
- Support and account management now run through a very large software vendor, and small manufacturers frequently report longer response paths than they had with the original company.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Prodsmart
On request- Prodsmart (Autodesk Fusion Operations)$undefined/year
- Mobile shop floor execution
- Traceability and production reporting
- Sold within the Autodesk Fusion product family
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Prodsmart if
- You need mobile shop floor declarations.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want no controller integration required.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Prodsmart better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Prodsmart?
- Augury starts at On request and Prodsmart at On request.
- Does Augury or Prodsmart run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Prodsmart is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Prodsmart cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Prodsmart covers Mobile shop floor declarations, No controller integration required, Traceability, Live production status.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Prodsmart: Who owns Prodsmart?
Autodesk acquired it in 2022 and has integrated it into the Fusion product family as its operations offering.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Prodsmart: Does it need my machines to be connected?
No. That is the central design decision. Operators declare production on mobile devices.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Prodsmart: Is it a full MES?
It covers execution, traceability and basic OEE. Detailed scheduling, quality workflows and controller level data are not its scope.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Prodsmart: Can I still buy it as a standalone product?
It is sold through Autodesk. Confirm the current packaging and pricing with Autodesk rather than relying on pre acquisition material.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs Tulip
- Augury vs MachineMetrics
- Augury vs TrakSYS
- Augury vs Authentise
- Augury vs Oqton
- Augury vs Flow Software
- Augury vs QAD Redzone
- Augury vs Sight Machine
- Augury vs Guidewheel
- Augury vs ProShop ERP
- Augury vs Ignition
- Augury vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Augury vs LabVIEW
- Prodsmart vs KCF Technologies
- Prodsmart vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Prodsmart vs Sensemore
- Prodsmart vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Prodsmart vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Prodsmart vs Erbessd Instruments
- Prodsmart vs PROGNOST Systems
- Prodsmart vs Petasense
- Prodsmart vs MOVUS
- Prodsmart vs Samotics
- Prodsmart vs Poseidon Systems
- Prodsmart vs eMaint
- Prodsmart vs ABB 800xA
- Prodsmart vs AVEVA System Platform
- Prodsmart vs Hippo CMMS
- Prodsmart vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Prodsmart vs 3YOURMIND
- Prodsmart vs AMFG
- Prodsmart vs Tulip
- Prodsmart vs MachineMetrics
- Prodsmart vs TrakSYS
- Prodsmart vs Authentise
- Prodsmart vs Oqton
- Prodsmart vs Flow Software
- Prodsmart vs QAD Redzone
- Prodsmart vs Sight Machine
- Prodsmart vs Guidewheel
- Prodsmart vs ProShop ERP
- Prodsmart vs Ignition
- Prodsmart vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Prodsmart vs LabVIEW
