Cybersecurity · head to head
OWASP ZAP vs SafeCity
OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.; SafeCity the vendor's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive in December 2021/January 2022 confirms Safecity is run by Red Dot Foundation, presenting itself as a community safety initiative with blog content and no commercial pricing page, product tier, or subscription anywhere on the site, consistent with a not-for-profit rather than a commercially sold product
- They diverge on capability: OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, SafeCity covers Video Surveillance.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OWASP ZAP and SafeCity actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
Only in SafeCity
- Video Surveillance
- AI Analytics
- Command Center
- Incident Management
- Emergency Response
- Camera Systems
- CAD
- GIS
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot SafeCity
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot SafeCity
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot SafeCity
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot SafeCity
SafeCity
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
SafeCity
- The vendor's own homepage as captured by the Internet Archive in December 2021/January 2022 confirms Safecity is run by Red Dot Foundation, presenting itself as a community safety initiative with blog content and no commercial pricing page, product tier, or subscription anywhere on the site, consistent with a not-for-profit rather than a commercially sold product
Pricing, plan by plan
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
SafeCity
$2000/month- City Platform$2000/month
- Video Analytics
- Command Center
- Incident Management
Which should you pick?
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Choose SafeCity if
- You need video surveillance.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- You also want ai analytics.
Questions people ask
- Is OWASP ZAP or SafeCity better?
- Neither clearly leads. OWASP ZAP starts at Free and SafeCity at $2000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OWASP ZAP or SafeCity?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OWASP ZAP and $2000/month for SafeCity.
- Does OWASP ZAP or SafeCity run on more platforms?
- OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api. SafeCity runs on Web, Desktop, Mobile.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. SafeCity starts at $2000/month.
- What is OWASP ZAP best used for?
- OWASP ZAP is most often used for adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful, manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester, teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselves, pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial dast subscription. Of those, adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handful and manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per tester are not what SafeCity is typically brought in for.
- What can OWASP ZAP do that SafeCity cannot?
- OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider. SafeCity covers Video Surveillance, AI Analytics, Command Center, Incident Management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
SafeCity: Is Safecity free to use?
Safecity is operated by the Red Dot Foundation, a non-profit organization (Sec 8, Not for Profit in India). The platform itself is presented as a free service that allows users to safely report incidents of abuse anonymously.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
SafeCity: How is Safecity funded?
Safecity's parent organization, the Red Dot Foundation, relies on donations to support its operations. The website includes a donation option for those who wish to contribute to the organization's mission.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
SafeCity: Is there a paid tier or premium features?
The available content does not disclose any paid tiers, premium features, or subscription models. Safecity appears to operate as a free service with no tiered pricing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs Vigilant Solutions
- OWASP ZAP vs Mark43
- OWASP ZAP vs Ring Neighbors
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs CentralSquare
- OWASP ZAP vs Axon Records
- OWASP ZAP vs Citizen
- OWASP ZAP vs ShotSpotter
- OWASP ZAP vs iCompass
- OWASP ZAP vs Mapbox Government
- OWASP ZAP vs MuckRock
- OWASP ZAP vs Municode
- OWASP ZAP vs GovQA
- SafeCity vs 1Password
- SafeCity vs Bitdefender Total Security
- SafeCity vs Norton 360
- SafeCity vs LastPass
- SafeCity vs Bitwarden
- SafeCity vs Burp Suite
- SafeCity vs Metasploit
- SafeCity vs Wireshark
- SafeCity vs authentik
- SafeCity vs Authelia
- SafeCity vs Infisical
- SafeCity vs Trivy
- SafeCity vs Feedzai
- SafeCity vs Frontegg
- SafeCity vs HashiCorp Boundary
- SafeCity vs JumpCloud
- SafeCity vs McAfee Total Protection
- SafeCity vs CivicPlus
- SafeCity vs Accela
- SafeCity vs Granicus
- SafeCity vs DocuWare
- SafeCity vs Vigilant Solutions
- SafeCity vs Mark43
- SafeCity vs Ring Neighbors
- SafeCity vs Tyler Technologies
- SafeCity vs CentralSquare
- SafeCity vs Axon Records
- SafeCity vs Citizen
- SafeCity vs ShotSpotter
- SafeCity vs iCompass
- SafeCity vs Mapbox Government
- SafeCity vs MuckRock
- SafeCity vs Municode
- SafeCity vs GovQA