Government · head to head
Mapbox Government vs OWASP ZAP

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Mapbox Government the Navigation SDK free tier covers only up to 10 monthly active users, and 11 or more requires contacting sales; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: Mapbox Government covers Custom Map Design, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Mapbox Government and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | Mapbox Government | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | usage-based | free |
| Platforms | Web, Ios, Android | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2010 | 2001 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Mapbox Government
- Custom Map Design
- Navigation SDK
- Geocoding
- Spatial Analysis
- Offline Maps
- AWS
- Azure
- Google Cloud
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Mapbox Government
- Embedding maps and turn by turn navigation in government applicationsnot OWASP ZAP
- Routing and geocoding for public sector fleet and field operationsnot OWASP ZAP
- Custom cartography for agency web and mobile appsnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot Mapbox Government
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot Mapbox Government
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot Mapbox Government
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot Mapbox Government
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Mapbox Government
- The Navigation SDK free tier covers only up to 10 monthly active users, and 11 or more requires contacting sales
- Volume pricing beyond the published free tiers is not listed and requires contacting sales for a discount
- Pricing is metered per product, so Directions API, Navigation SDK and map loads are each billed on their own meter
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
Mapbox Government
Free- GovernmentFree
- Custom Maps
- Navigation
- Geocoding
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose Mapbox Government if
- You need custom map design.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want navigation sdk.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is Mapbox Government or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. Mapbox Government starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Mapbox Government or OWASP ZAP?
- Mapbox Government starts at Free and OWASP ZAP at Free.
- Does Mapbox Government or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- Mapbox Government runs on Web, Ios, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use Mapbox Government for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Mapbox Government best used for?
- Mapbox Government is most often used for embedding maps and turn by turn navigation in government applications, routing and geocoding for public sector fleet and field operations, custom cartography for agency web and mobile apps. Of those, embedding maps and turn by turn navigation in government applications and routing and geocoding for public sector fleet and field operations are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can Mapbox Government do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- Mapbox Government covers Custom Map Design, Navigation SDK, Geocoding, Spatial Analysis. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
OWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
OWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
OWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on Mapbox Government
Other head to heads
- Mapbox Government vs Accela
- Mapbox Government vs CivicPlus
- Mapbox Government vs Granicus
- Mapbox Government vs DocuWare
- Mapbox Government vs Incode
- Mapbox Government vs OpenCities
- Mapbox Government vs Oracle Government Cloud
- Mapbox Government vs eCode360
- Mapbox Government vs AWS GovCloud
- Mapbox Government vs Google Cloud for Government
- Mapbox Government vs Palantir Gotham
- Mapbox Government vs OnBase
- Mapbox Government vs Polco
- Mapbox Government vs PublicInput
- Mapbox Government vs RecDesk
- Mapbox Government vs Legistar
- Mapbox Government vs Tyler Brazos
- Mapbox Government vs Socrata
- Mapbox Government vs 1Password
- Mapbox Government vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Mapbox Government vs Norton 360
- Mapbox Government vs LastPass
- Mapbox Government vs Bitwarden
- Mapbox Government vs Burp Suite
- Mapbox Government vs Metasploit
- Mapbox Government vs Wireshark
- Mapbox Government vs authentik
- Mapbox Government vs Authelia
- Mapbox Government vs Infisical
- Mapbox Government vs Trivy
- Mapbox Government vs Feedzai
- Mapbox Government vs Frontegg
- Mapbox Government vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Mapbox Government vs JumpCloud
- Mapbox Government vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs Incode
- OWASP ZAP vs OpenCities
- OWASP ZAP vs Oracle Government Cloud
- OWASP ZAP vs eCode360
- OWASP ZAP vs AWS GovCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs Google Cloud for Government
- OWASP ZAP vs Palantir Gotham
- OWASP ZAP vs OnBase
- OWASP ZAP vs Polco
- OWASP ZAP vs PublicInput
- OWASP ZAP vs RecDesk
- OWASP ZAP vs Legistar
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Brazos
- OWASP ZAP vs Socrata
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection

