Government · head to head
CentralSquare vs OWASP ZAP

CentralSquare
Government
Public Safety and Administration Software
- From
- $1500/month
- Free plan
- No

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: CentralSquare no pricing information is published on the website; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: CentralSquare covers Computer-Aided Dispatch, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CentralSquare and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
| Attribute | CentralSquare | OWASP ZAP |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $1500/month | Free |
| Pricing model | subscription | free |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Desktop, Ios, Android | Desktop, Cli, Api |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
| Founded | 2018 | 2001 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CentralSquare
- Computer-Aided Dispatch
- Records Management
- Jail Management
- Fire RMS
- Community Development
- Esri ArcGIS
- FBI CJIS
- NCIC
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CentralSquare
- Citizen Servicesnot OWASP ZAP
- Records Managementnot OWASP ZAP
- Public Safetynot OWASP ZAP
- Civic Engagementnot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot CentralSquare
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot CentralSquare
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot CentralSquare
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot CentralSquare
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CentralSquare
- No pricing information is published on the website
- Pricing model is not disclosed; visitors are directed to request a demo or contact sales
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
CentralSquare
$1500/month- Public Safety Suite$1500/month
- CAD
- Records Management
- Mobile Solutions
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose CentralSquare if
- You need computer-aided dispatch.
- You work on Web, Desktop, Ios, Android.
- You also want records management.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is CentralSquare or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. CentralSquare starts at $1500/month and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CentralSquare or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1500/month for CentralSquare and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does CentralSquare or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- CentralSquare runs on Web, Desktop, Ios, Android. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. CentralSquare starts at $1500/month.
- What is CentralSquare best used for?
- CentralSquare is most often used for citizen services, records management, public safety, civic engagement. Of those, citizen services and records management are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can CentralSquare do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- CentralSquare covers Computer-Aided Dispatch, Records Management, Jail Management, Fire RMS. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CentralSquare: How much does CentralSquare cost?
CentralSquare does not publish pricing on its website. The company directs customers to request a demo or schedule a call with their sales team to discuss pricing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
CentralSquare: What is CentralSquare's pricing model?
The pricing model is not disclosed. CentralSquare appears to use a custom quote or consultation-based approach, as the website does not mention subscription plans or tier-based pricing.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
CentralSquare: Is there a free tier or trial?
No information about free tiers or trials is available on the website.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
CentralSquare: How do I get a pricing quote?
Contact CentralSquare through their website to request a demo or schedule a call with their sales team.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
More on CentralSquare
Other head to heads
- CentralSquare vs Granicus
- CentralSquare vs Accela
- CentralSquare vs CivicPlus
- CentralSquare vs DocuWare
- CentralSquare vs OpenCities
- CentralSquare vs Mark43
- CentralSquare vs Ring Neighbors
- CentralSquare vs Tyler Technologies
- CentralSquare vs Citizen
- CentralSquare vs SafeCity
- CentralSquare vs Axon Records
- CentralSquare vs IAPro
- CentralSquare vs SAP for Government
- CentralSquare vs SeeClickFix
- CentralSquare vs ShotSpotter
- CentralSquare vs Rock Solid
- CentralSquare vs 1Password
- CentralSquare vs Bitdefender Total Security
- CentralSquare vs Norton 360
- CentralSquare vs LastPass
- CentralSquare vs Bitwarden
- CentralSquare vs Burp Suite
- CentralSquare vs Metasploit
- CentralSquare vs Wireshark
- CentralSquare vs authentik
- CentralSquare vs Authelia
- CentralSquare vs Infisical
- CentralSquare vs Trivy
- CentralSquare vs Feedzai
- CentralSquare vs Frontegg
- CentralSquare vs HashiCorp Boundary
- CentralSquare vs JumpCloud
- CentralSquare vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Granicus
- OWASP ZAP vs Accela
- OWASP ZAP vs CivicPlus
- OWASP ZAP vs DocuWare
- OWASP ZAP vs OpenCities
- OWASP ZAP vs Mark43
- OWASP ZAP vs Ring Neighbors
- OWASP ZAP vs Tyler Technologies
- OWASP ZAP vs Citizen
- OWASP ZAP vs SafeCity
- OWASP ZAP vs Axon Records
- OWASP ZAP vs IAPro
- OWASP ZAP vs SAP for Government
- OWASP ZAP vs SeeClickFix
- OWASP ZAP vs ShotSpotter
- OWASP ZAP vs Rock Solid
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
