Manufacturing · head to head
Kepware Server vs OpenBOM

Kepware Server
Manufacturing
Industrial connectivity server translating 150-plus PLC protocols into OPC UA, formerly KEPServerEX
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Kepware Server the base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kepware Server and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kepware Server | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kepware Server
- 150-plus device drivers
- OPC UA server
- IoT Gateway
- DataLogger
- Redundancy Master
- Security Policies
- Configuration API
- Kepware Edge
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kepware Server
- Feeding a historian from a mixed plant of Allen-Bradley and Siemens PLCs without writing per-protocol driversnot OpenBOM
- Publishing CNC machine state from FANUC and Haas controls to an OEE system over MQTTnot OpenBOM
- Bridging legacy serial Modbus devices into an OPC UA architecture during a phased controller replacementnot OpenBOM
- Running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during Windows patchingnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Kepware Server
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Kepware Server
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Kepware Server
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Kepware Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kepware Server
- The base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.
- KEPServerEX to Kepware Server 7 is a migration rather than an in-place upgrade, and driver entitlements do not always transfer cleanly, so budget for revalidating every channel.
- The full driver portfolio is Windows-only; the Linux product, Kepware Edge, supports a subset of drivers and is subscription-licensed by tag count, so an edge-first architecture cannot simply reuse the Windows configuration.
- Three names have been in circulation for the same lineage, and quotes, forum answers and integrator experience still mix KEPServerEX, ThingWorx Kepware Server and Kepware Server, which produces mismatched proposals.
- It is a translation layer with no storage, contextualisation or visualisation of its own, so it is always an addition to a historian or platform purchase rather than a substitute for one.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kepware Server
On request- Kepware Server$undefined/year
- Base server as a perpetual licence with annual maintenance, or subscription
- Driver suites priced by protocol family and bought separately from the server
- Advanced plug-ins such as IoT Gateway, DataLogger and Redundancy Master licensed individually
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Kepware Server if
- You need 150-plus device drivers.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want opc ua server.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Kepware Server or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kepware Server starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kepware Server or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Kepware Server and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Kepware Server or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Kepware Server runs on Windows, Linux. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Kepware Server starts at On request.
- What is Kepware Server best used for?
- Kepware Server is most often used for feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers, publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt, bridging legacy serial modbus devices into an opc ua architecture during a phased controller replacement, running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during windows patching. Of those, feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers and publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Kepware Server do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, OPC UA server, IoT Gateway, DataLogger. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kepware Server: Is KEPServerEX discontinued?
The name is. KEPServerEX and ThingWorx Kepware Server have been unified into Kepware Server, currently version 7, and the older names are being retired.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Kepware Server: Is a perpetual licence still available?
Yes for the Windows server, with annual maintenance. Kepware Edge on Linux is subscription-only.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Kepware Server: What drives the price?
The number and type of driver suites, not the number of tags on the Windows product. Kepware Edge is priced by tag count.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Kepware Server: Can I evaluate it before buying?
Yes. The runtime works for two hours at a time without a licence, indefinitely, which is enough to prove connectivity but not to run production.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
More on Kepware Server
Other head to heads
- Kepware Server vs Ignition
- Kepware Server vs Litmus Edge
- Kepware Server vs Augury
- Kepware Server vs Guidewheel
- Kepware Server vs Sensemore
- Kepware Server vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Kepware Server vs KCF Technologies
- Kepware Server vs Oden Technologies
- Kepware Server vs ABB 800xA
- Kepware Server vs Aras Innovator
- Kepware Server vs GENESIS Version 11
- Kepware Server vs AVEVA System Platform
- Kepware Server vs Markforged Eiger
- Kepware Server vs Materialise Magics
- Kepware Server vs MOVUS
- Kepware Server vs Oqton
- Kepware Server vs Fusion 360
- Kepware Server vs Duro PLM
- Kepware Server vs PTC Windchill
- Kepware Server vs Propel
- Kepware Server vs Seeq
- Kepware Server vs SolidWorks
- Kepware Server vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Kepware Server vs AMFG
- Kepware Server vs Authentise
- Kepware Server vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Kepware Server vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Kepware Server vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Litmus Edge
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs Guidewheel
- OpenBOM vs Sensemore
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs ABB 800xA
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs GENESIS Version 11
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Markforged Eiger
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs MOVUS
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
