Manufacturing · head to head
Kepware Server vs Materialise Magics

Kepware Server
Manufacturing
Industrial connectivity server translating 150-plus PLC protocols into OPC UA, formerly KEPServerEX
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kepware Server the base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.; Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- They diverge on capability: Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kepware Server and Materialise Magics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kepware Server | Materialise Magics |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Windows |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kepware Server
- 150-plus device drivers
- OPC UA server
- IoT Gateway
- DataLogger
- Redundancy Master
- Security Policies
- Configuration API
- Kepware Edge
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kepware Server
- Feeding a historian from a mixed plant of Allen-Bradley and Siemens PLCs without writing per-protocol driversnot Materialise Magics
- Publishing CNC machine state from FANUC and Haas controls to an OEE system over MQTTnot Materialise Magics
- Bridging legacy serial Modbus devices into an OPC UA architecture during a phased controller replacementnot Materialise Magics
- Running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during Windows patchingnot Materialise Magics
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot Kepware Server
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot Kepware Server
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot Kepware Server
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot Kepware Server
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kepware Server
- The base server is the small part of the bill; driver suites are priced by protocol family, and a mixed-vendor plant buys several, which is how a connectivity layer alone reaches tens of thousands of dollars.
- KEPServerEX to Kepware Server 7 is a migration rather than an in-place upgrade, and driver entitlements do not always transfer cleanly, so budget for revalidating every channel.
- The full driver portfolio is Windows-only; the Linux product, Kepware Edge, supports a subset of drivers and is subscription-licensed by tag count, so an edge-first architecture cannot simply reuse the Windows configuration.
- Three names have been in circulation for the same lineage, and quotes, forum answers and integrator experience still mix KEPServerEX, ThingWorx Kepware Server and Kepware Server, which produces mismatched proposals.
- It is a translation layer with no storage, contextualisation or visualisation of its own, so it is always an addition to a historian or platform purchase rather than a substitute for one.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kepware Server
On request- Kepware Server$undefined/year
- Base server as a perpetual licence with annual maintenance, or subscription
- Driver suites priced by protocol family and bought separately from the server
- Advanced plug-ins such as IoT Gateway, DataLogger and Redundancy Master licensed individually
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
Which should you pick?
Choose Kepware Server if
- You need 150-plus device drivers.
- You work on Windows, Linux.
- You also want opc ua server.
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Questions people ask
- Is Kepware Server or Materialise Magics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kepware Server starts at On request and Materialise Magics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kepware Server or Materialise Magics?
- Kepware Server starts at On request and Materialise Magics at On request.
- Does Kepware Server or Materialise Magics run on more platforms?
- Kepware Server runs on Windows, Linux. Materialise Magics runs on Windows.
- What is Kepware Server best used for?
- Kepware Server is most often used for feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers, publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt, bridging legacy serial modbus devices into an opc ua architecture during a phased controller replacement, running redundant collection servers so a cloud analytics pipeline does not lose data during windows patching. Of those, feeding a historian from a mixed plant of allen-bradley and siemens plcs without writing per-protocol drivers and publishing cnc machine state from fanuc and haas controls to an oee system over mqtt are not what Materialise Magics is typically brought in for.
- What can Kepware Server do that Materialise Magics cannot?
- Kepware Server covers 150-plus device drivers, OPC UA server, IoT Gateway, DataLogger. Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kepware Server: Is KEPServerEX discontinued?
The name is. KEPServerEX and ThingWorx Kepware Server have been unified into Kepware Server, currently version 7, and the older names are being retired.
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
Kepware Server: Is a perpetual licence still available?
Yes for the Windows server, with annual maintenance. Kepware Edge on Linux is subscription-only.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Kepware Server: What drives the price?
The number and type of driver suites, not the number of tags on the Windows product. Kepware Edge is priced by tag count.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Kepware Server: Can I evaluate it before buying?
Yes. The runtime works for two hours at a time without a licence, indefinitely, which is enough to prove connectivity but not to run production.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Related pages
More on Kepware Server
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Kepware Server vs Ignition
- Kepware Server vs Litmus Edge
- Kepware Server vs Augury
- Kepware Server vs Guidewheel
- Kepware Server vs Sensemore
- Kepware Server vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Kepware Server vs KCF Technologies
- Kepware Server vs Oden Technologies
- Kepware Server vs ABB 800xA
- Kepware Server vs Aras Innovator
- Kepware Server vs GENESIS Version 11
- Kepware Server vs AVEVA System Platform
- Kepware Server vs Markforged Eiger
- Kepware Server vs MOVUS
- Kepware Server vs OpenBOM
- Kepware Server vs Oqton
- Kepware Server vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Kepware Server vs GrabCAD Print
- Kepware Server vs Formlabs PreForm
- Kepware Server vs Simplify3D
- Kepware Server vs SolidWorks
- Kepware Server vs 3YOURMIND
- Kepware Server vs Authentise
- Kepware Server vs Dyndrite
- Kepware Server vs QAD Redzone
- Kepware Server vs Seeq
- Kepware Server vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Kepware Server vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Ignition
- Materialise Magics vs Litmus Edge
- Materialise Magics vs Augury
- Materialise Magics vs Guidewheel
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs KCF Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs Oden Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs ABB 800xA
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs GENESIS Version 11
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs MOVUS
- Materialise Magics vs OpenBOM
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
