Marketing · head to head
Matomo vs Wireshark

Wireshark
Cybersecurity
The world's foremost network protocol analyzer
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Matomo the self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins; Wireshark free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Matomo covers Web analytics, Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Matomo and Wireshark actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Matomo
- Web analytics
- Real-time reports
- Custom dimensions
- Goal tracking
- E-commerce tracking
- Google Search Console
- Privacy-focused
- Cloud deployment
Only in Wireshark
- Deep packet inspection
- Live capture
- Offline analysis
- 3000+ protocol support
- Rich display filters
- VoIP analysis
- Decryption support
- Scripting with Lua
Both cover
- On-premise deployment
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Matomo
- Privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to Google Analyticsnot Wireshark
- Self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructurenot Wireshark
Wireshark
- Network Securitynot Matomo
- Packet Analysisnot Matomo
- Open Sourcenot Matomo
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Matomo
- The self hosted Community Edition is free but excludes A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, cohorts, crash analytics and multi channel attribution, all of which are paid plugins
- Premium plugin bundles for self hosted installs run from 275 EUR a month for 4 users to 3,400 EUR for 50
- Cloud pricing is banded by monthly hits, and anything above 10 million requires contacting sales
- Self hosting places all operation and upgrades on the operator while still needing paid plugins for the advanced features
Wireshark
- Free and open source under the GNU GPL; downloadable without paying any license fee, no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Matomo
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Open-source
- Full analytics
- Privacy-focused
Wireshark
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Deep inspection
- Live capture
Which should you pick?
Choose Matomo if
- You need web analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, On-premise.
- You also want real-time reports.
Choose Wireshark if
- You need deep packet inspection.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli.
- You also want live capture.
Questions people ask
- Is Matomo or Wireshark better?
- Neither clearly leads. Matomo starts at Free and Wireshark at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Matomo or Wireshark?
- Matomo starts at Free and Wireshark at Free.
- Does Matomo or Wireshark run on more platforms?
- Matomo runs on Web, On-premise. Wireshark runs on Desktop, Cli.
- Can I use Matomo for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Matomo best used for?
- Matomo is most often used for privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to google analytics, self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructure. Of those, privacy focused web analytics as an alternative to google analytics and self hosting analytics so visitor data stays on owned infrastructure are not what Wireshark is typically brought in for.
- What can Matomo do that Wireshark cannot?
- Matomo covers Web analytics, Real-time reports, Custom dimensions, Goal tracking. Wireshark covers Deep packet inspection, Live capture, Offline analysis, 3000+ protocol support. Both handle On-premise deployment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Matomo: How much does Matomo cost?
Matomo Cloud starts at EUR 29 per month for the Starter plan, which covers 50,000 hits per month. Matomo On-Premise has a free Community edition, with paid bundles from EUR 275 per month for up to 5M hits and 4 users.
SourceWireshark: Is there a cost to download and use Wireshark?
No, Wireshark is completely free. It's distributed under the GNU General Public License version 2, making it "free software" with no demo limitations. The full version is available at no cost.
SourceMatomo: Is Matomo free?
The On-Premise Community edition is free forever with unlimited users and hits, supported through the forum only. Matomo Cloud is a paid service, though a free trial with access to all core features is offered.
SourceWireshark: What support options are available for Wireshark users?
Wireshark offers multiple support channels including mailing lists, an active Discord community, the Ask Wireshark Q&A platform, comprehensive documentation, a user guide, and developer resources for those needing technical assistance.
SourceMatomo: What is the difference between Matomo Cloud and On-Premise?
Cloud plans include hosting, maintenance, automatic updates and daily backups, priced by monthly hits from EUR 29. On-Premise is self-hosted, free in its Community edition, with paid bundles adding support and higher user counts.
SourceWireshark: Are there different pricing tiers or subscription levels?
Wireshark does not offer pricing tiers or subscriptions. There is one free version available to all users regardless of use case, personal, professional, or organizational.
SourceMatomo: How many hits do the Matomo On-Premise bundles cover?
The Team bundle covers up to 5M hits per month and 4 users at EUR 275 per month. Business covers up to 30M hits and 20 users at EUR 1,450. Enterprise covers up to 100M hits and 50 users at EUR 3,400.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Matomo vs Umami
- Matomo vs Crazy Egg
- Matomo vs Ruler Analytics
- Matomo vs VWO
- Matomo vs Northbeam
- Matomo vs Countly
- Matomo vs Fathom Analytics
- Matomo vs Mautic
- Matomo vs Attribution
- Matomo vs Plausible
- Matomo vs Freshpaint
- Matomo vs Simple Analytics
- Matomo vs Mailgun
- Matomo vs Triple Whale
- Matomo vs Adobe Analytics
- Matomo vs Adverity
- Matomo vs Bloomreach
- Matomo vs CallRail
- Matomo vs 1Password
- Matomo vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Matomo vs Norton 360
- Matomo vs LastPass
- Matomo vs Bitwarden
- Matomo vs OWASP ZAP
- Matomo vs Syft
- Matomo vs Metasploit
- Matomo vs Cosign
- Matomo vs HashiCorp Vault
- Matomo vs Infisical
- Matomo vs Semgrep
- Matomo vs Fenergo
- Matomo vs Google Authenticator
- Matomo vs Hanwha Vision
- Matomo vs Idira
- Matomo vs IVPN
- Matomo vs Grype
- Wireshark vs Umami
- Wireshark vs Crazy Egg
- Wireshark vs Ruler Analytics
- Wireshark vs VWO
- Wireshark vs Northbeam
- Wireshark vs Countly
- Wireshark vs Fathom Analytics
- Wireshark vs Mautic
- Wireshark vs Attribution
- Wireshark vs Plausible
- Wireshark vs Freshpaint
- Wireshark vs Simple Analytics
- Wireshark vs Mailgun
- Wireshark vs Triple Whale
- Wireshark vs Adobe Analytics
- Wireshark vs Adverity
- Wireshark vs Bloomreach
- Wireshark vs CallRail
- Wireshark vs 1Password
- Wireshark vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Wireshark vs Norton 360
- Wireshark vs LastPass
- Wireshark vs Bitwarden
- Wireshark vs OWASP ZAP
- Wireshark vs Syft
- Wireshark vs Metasploit
- Wireshark vs Cosign
- Wireshark vs HashiCorp Vault
- Wireshark vs Infisical
- Wireshark vs Semgrep
- Wireshark vs Fenergo
- Wireshark vs Google Authenticator
- Wireshark vs Hanwha Vision
- Wireshark vs Idira
- Wireshark vs IVPN
- Wireshark vs Grype

