Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs SKF Enlight Centre

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

SKF Enlight Centre
Manufacturing
Asset-based machine health monitoring platform from SKF, tying wireless sensors, route collection and remote diagnostics together
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; SKF Enlight Centre no pricing is published for the software, the sensors, the gateways or the remote diagnostic services, so the total cost of a deployment only emerges after a site survey and a quotation.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, SKF Enlight Centre covers Asset-based interface.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and SKF Enlight Centre actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | SKF Enlight Centre |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in SKF Enlight Centre
- Asset-based interface
- Enlight Collect IMx-1
- Enlight ProCollect
- Remote diagnostic services
- Marine deployment
- Root cause tooling
- Dashboards
- Hazardous area sensing
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot SKF Enlight Centre
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot SKF Enlight Centre
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot SKF Enlight Centre
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot SKF Enlight Centre
SKF Enlight Centre
- A shipowner monitoring auxiliary engines, purifiers and pumps across a fleet without a vibration analyst on each vesselnot Materialise Magics
- A plant already standardised on SKF bearings that wants failure-mode diagnosis from the bearing manufacturernot Materialise Magics
- An operator replacing paper-based handheld routes with ProCollect while keeping the same measurement pointsnot Materialise Magics
- A site in a hazardous classified area needing certified wireless sensing rather than manual data collectionnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
SKF Enlight Centre
- No pricing is published for the software, the sensors, the gateways or the remote diagnostic services, so the total cost of a deployment only emerges after a site survey and a quotation.
- The platform is built for SKF sensing hardware, so third-party sensors are poorly served and you are effectively committing to SKF for the life of the installation.
- Remote diagnostic services are a separate ongoing contract, and without them the platform gives you data rather than verdicts, which most buyers of Enlight Centre do not have the staff to interpret.
- SKF has run overlapping condition monitoring products including @ptitude Observer and Enlight AI, and the boundaries between them have shifted over time, which makes long-term product roadmap commitments hard to read.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors on shipboard or high-vibration installations need periodic replacement, and that maintenance burden falls on crews who were the reason you automated collection in the first place.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
SKF Enlight Centre
On request- SKF Enlight Centre$undefined/year
- Software subscription quoted per site or per vessel
- Enlight Collect IMx-1 sensors and gateways purchased separately
- SKF remote diagnostic services contracted per asset or per fleet
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose SKF Enlight Centre if
- You need asset-based interface.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want enlight collect imx-1.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or SKF Enlight Centre better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and SKF Enlight Centre at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or SKF Enlight Centre?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and SKF Enlight Centre at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or SKF Enlight Centre run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. SKF Enlight Centre runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what SKF Enlight Centre is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that SKF Enlight Centre cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. SKF Enlight Centre covers Asset-based interface, Enlight Collect IMx-1, Enlight ProCollect, Remote diagnostic services.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
SKF Enlight Centre: Is Enlight Centre a single product or a family?
SKF Enlight is a family. Enlight Centre is the web software; Enlight Collect IMx-1 is the wireless sensing hardware and Enlight AI is a separate analytics product.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
SKF Enlight Centre: Can I use non-SKF sensors?
Not meaningfully. The platform is designed around SKF sensing hardware and SKF service delivery.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
SKF Enlight Centre: Does SKF analyse the data for me?
Only under a remote diagnostic services contract with an SKF Rotating Equipment Performance Centre, priced separately.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
SKF Enlight Centre: Is it suitable for ships?
Yes, marine is one of its primary segments and it is designed for intermittent satellite connectivity.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
More on SKF Enlight Centre
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Augury
- Materialise Magics vs KCF Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Materialise Magics vs Petasense
- Materialise Magics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Materialise Magics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs PROGNOST Systems
- Materialise Magics vs MOVUS
- Materialise Magics vs eMaint
- Materialise Magics vs Samotics
- Materialise Magics vs Poseidon Systems
- Materialise Magics vs ProShop ERP
- Materialise Magics vs Protolabs
- Materialise Magics vs PTC Windchill
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Autodesk Netfabb
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Oqton
- SKF Enlight Centre vs GrabCAD Print
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Formlabs PreForm
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Simplify3D
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Markforged Eiger
- SKF Enlight Centre vs SolidWorks
- SKF Enlight Centre vs AVEVA System Platform
- SKF Enlight Centre vs 3YOURMIND
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Aras Innovator
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Authentise
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Dyndrite
- SKF Enlight Centre vs QAD Redzone
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Seeq
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Sensemore
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- SKF Enlight Centre vs TrendMiner
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Augury
- SKF Enlight Centre vs KCF Technologies
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Petasense
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Erbessd Instruments
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- SKF Enlight Centre vs PROGNOST Systems
- SKF Enlight Centre vs MOVUS
- SKF Enlight Centre vs eMaint
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Samotics
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Poseidon Systems
- SKF Enlight Centre vs ProShop ERP
- SKF Enlight Centre vs Protolabs
- SKF Enlight Centre vs PTC Windchill
