Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs Oqton

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Oqton
Manufacturing
3D Systems manufacturing operating system for additive, narrowed after Geomagic was sold to Hexagon
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; Oqton 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Oqton covers Manufacturing OS.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and Oqton actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | Oqton |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Windows, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in Oqton
- Manufacturing OS
- Build preparation
- Machine connectivity
- Traceability
- Automated nesting
- Quality data
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot Oqton
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot Oqton
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot Oqton
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot Oqton
Oqton
- A metal additive production site scheduling builds across several machines rather than per operatornot Materialise Magics
- A dental manufacturer needing batch to part traceability for regulated devicesnot Materialise Magics
- A 3D Systems printer customer moving from prototyping to serial productionnot Materialise Magics
- A factory automating build nesting to raise platform utilisationnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
Oqton
- 3D Systems sold the Geomagic portfolio to Hexagon in April 2025, so buyers who chose Oqton for an end-to-end scanning-to-production suite now deal with two separate vendors and two roadmaps.
- No pricing is published, and licensing is split between the manufacturing OS and separately licensed build preparation modules, so the quoted figure is rarely the full cost.
- Support is deepest on 3D Systems hardware despite multi-vendor claims, so a mixed fleet gets uneven data capture and control.
- The parent company has been under financial pressure and has already divested a major software line, which is a genuine continuity risk for a system running a production floor.
- It is additive-only, so a manufacturer with mixed processes needs a conventional MES alongside it and an integration between the two.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
Oqton
On request- Oqton Industrial Manufacturing OS$undefined/year
- Annual subscription quoted by 3D Systems
- Priced on connected machines and sites
- Build preparation modules licensed separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose Oqton if
- You need manufacturing os.
- You work on Web, Windows, API.
- You also want build preparation.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or Oqton better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and Oqton at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or Oqton?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and Oqton at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or Oqton run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. Oqton runs on Web, Windows, API.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what Oqton is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that Oqton cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. Oqton covers Manufacturing OS, Build preparation, Machine connectivity, Traceability.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
Oqton: Who owns Oqton?
3D Systems, which acquired it in 2021 and made it the central software brand.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Oqton: Did Oqton include Geomagic?
It did. 3D Systems completed the sale of the Geomagic portfolio, including Design X, Control X, Freeform and Wrap, to Hexagon for $123 million in April 2025. Oqton retained 3D Sprint, 3DXpert and the Manufacturing OS.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Oqton: Does Oqton work with printers from other manufacturers?
It connects to multi-vendor equipment, but the deepest integration and support is on 3D Systems machines.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Oqton: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted annually, typically on connected machines and sites, with build preparation modules licensed separately.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Fulcrum
- Materialise Magics vs Tulip
- Materialise Magics vs MachineMetrics
- Materialise Magics vs Duro PLM
- Materialise Magics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Materialise Magics vs Fictiv
- Materialise Magics vs Flow Software
- Materialise Magics vs Prodsmart
- Oqton vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Oqton vs GrabCAD Print
- Oqton vs Formlabs PreForm
- Oqton vs Simplify3D
- Oqton vs Markforged Eiger
- Oqton vs SolidWorks
- Oqton vs AVEVA System Platform
- Oqton vs 3YOURMIND
- Oqton vs Aras Innovator
- Oqton vs Authentise
- Oqton vs Dyndrite
- Oqton vs QAD Redzone
- Oqton vs Seeq
- Oqton vs Sensemore
- Oqton vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Oqton vs TrendMiner
- Oqton vs Fulcrum
- Oqton vs Tulip
- Oqton vs MachineMetrics
- Oqton vs Duro PLM
- Oqton vs Erbessd Instruments
- Oqton vs Fictiv
- Oqton vs Flow Software
- Oqton vs Prodsmart
