Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs MOVUS

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

MOVUS
Manufacturing
Australian condition monitoring combining a magnetic sensor with a monitored alerting service
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; MOVUS mOVUS is a small independent company, so standardising a large estate on its sensors carries supplier continuity risk that a purchase from a major instrumentation vendor does not.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, MOVUS covers FitMachine sensor.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and MOVUS actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | MOVUS |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Cloud, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in MOVUS
- FitMachine sensor
- FitMachine 3XT EX
- Assessed alerts
- Condition scoring
- Rapid installation
- Partner delivery
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot MOVUS
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot MOVUS
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot MOVUS
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot MOVUS
MOVUS
- A mining operation instrumenting pumps and fans in a classified hazardous zone where cabled monitoring would require an outage and an electrical projectnot Materialise Magics
- A water utility with a small maintenance team that wants assessed alerts rather than a dashboard nobody has time to interpretnot Materialise Magics
- A food processing site adding condition monitoring to existing assets without production downtime, using magnetic mountingnot Materialise Magics
- An Australian operator that wants local support and local calibration data rather than a Northern Hemisphere vendor with a resellernot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
MOVUS
- MOVUS is a small independent company, so standardising a large estate on its sensors carries supplier continuity risk that a purchase from a major instrumentation vendor does not.
- Support and service outside Australia and New Zealand depend on partners, which means response times, commercial terms and technical depth vary by country in ways the vendor cannot fully control.
- Per-asset subscription plus per-asset hardware means the cost of full coverage rises linearly, so most sites end up monitoring a subset and leaving the long tail of small motors unmonitored.
- The single condition score is designed for planners rather than analysts, which suits teams without vibration expertise but frustrates reliability engineers who want the underlying spectra to diagnose a specific defect.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, gateway requirements, subscription rate or contract term, so a realistic total cost for a site rollout cannot be estimated without a sales conversation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
MOVUS
On request- FitMachine$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- FitMachine sensor hardware required per asset
- Gateway hardware required per area
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose MOVUS if
- You need fitmachine sensor.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want fitmachine 3xt ex.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or MOVUS better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and MOVUS at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or MOVUS?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and MOVUS at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or MOVUS run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. MOVUS runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what MOVUS is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that MOVUS cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. MOVUS covers FitMachine sensor, FitMachine 3XT EX, Assessed alerts, Condition scoring.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
MOVUS: Is there a hazardous area version?
Yes. The FitMachine 3XT EX is certified for hazardous zones, with availability from February 2026.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
MOVUS: Do I get raw vibration data?
The product is built around an assessed condition score and reviewed alerts. Reliability engineers wanting full spectra should confirm what data access their contract includes.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
MOVUS: Does installation need an electrician?
No for the sensor, which mounts magnetically and runs on battery. Gateways typically need power and network, which is where the site work sits.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
MOVUS: Is MOVUS available outside Australia?
Yes, largely through partners including industrial services and insurance-linked risk programmes, with support quality varying by region.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Materialise Magics vs Samotics
- Materialise Magics vs Petasense
- Materialise Magics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs KCF Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Materialise Magics vs Augury
- Materialise Magics vs Poseidon Systems
- Materialise Magics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Materialise Magics vs eMaint
- Materialise Magics vs PROGNOST Systems
- Materialise Magics vs Xometry
- Materialise Magics vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Materialise Magics vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Materialise Magics vs LabVIEW
- MOVUS vs Autodesk Netfabb
- MOVUS vs Oqton
- MOVUS vs GrabCAD Print
- MOVUS vs Formlabs PreForm
- MOVUS vs Simplify3D
- MOVUS vs Markforged Eiger
- MOVUS vs SolidWorks
- MOVUS vs AVEVA System Platform
- MOVUS vs 3YOURMIND
- MOVUS vs Aras Innovator
- MOVUS vs Authentise
- MOVUS vs Dyndrite
- MOVUS vs QAD Redzone
- MOVUS vs Seeq
- MOVUS vs Sensemore
- MOVUS vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- MOVUS vs TrendMiner
- MOVUS vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- MOVUS vs Samotics
- MOVUS vs Petasense
- MOVUS vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- MOVUS vs KCF Technologies
- MOVUS vs SKF Enlight Centre
- MOVUS vs Augury
- MOVUS vs Poseidon Systems
- MOVUS vs Erbessd Instruments
- MOVUS vs eMaint
- MOVUS vs PROGNOST Systems
- MOVUS vs Xometry
- MOVUS vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- MOVUS vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- MOVUS vs LabVIEW
