Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs Samotics

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Samotics
Manufacturing
Condition monitoring of motor-driven assets using electrical signature analysis from the motor control cabinet
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; Samotics sAM4 only sees what reaches the motor electrically, so it covers the driven train and misses un-driven equipment, structures, process conditions and anything downstream of a mechanical decoupling.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Samotics covers Electrical signature analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and Samotics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | Samotics |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Cloud |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in Samotics
- Electrical signature analysis
- Switchroom installation
- Energy and efficiency measurement
- Submersible and hazardous area coverage
- Fault classification
- Fleet view
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot Samotics
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot Samotics
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot Samotics
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot Samotics
Samotics
- A water utility monitoring submersible and borehole pumps that no vibration sensor can be fitted to without lifting the pumpnot Materialise Magics
- A chemical plant with assets in ATEX zones where certifying and maintaining in-field sensors is more expensive than the monitoring itselfnot Materialise Magics
- A food plant that wants pump and mixer condition data without opening guarding or taking a hygiene-critical line down to fit sensorsnot Materialise Magics
- A site building an energy reduction case, where measured motor efficiency and waste give the business case a payback that reliability alone would notnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
Samotics
- SAM4 only sees what reaches the motor electrically, so it covers the driven train and misses un-driven equipment, structures, process conditions and anything downstream of a mechanical decoupling.
- Each monitored motor needs hardware installed in the motor control centre by a qualified electrician, and in older switchrooms that installation, including any required outage, can cost more than a year of the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing means the cost scales linearly with the number of motors, so a plant with a thousand small motors faces a bill that a fixed-price plant-wide vibration system would not impose.
- Electrical signature analysis on variable-speed drives is harder than on direct-on-line motors, and results vary with drive type, so a heavily VSD estate should insist on a pilot on its own drives before committing.
- Nothing is published on price, contract length or minimum deployment size, and the vendor sells multi-year subscriptions, so early exit terms are a negotiation you have to raise yourself.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
Samotics
On request- SAM4$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- SAM4 sensor hardware required in each motor control centre
- Electrical installation by a qualified electrician, quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose Samotics if
- You need electrical signature analysis.
- You work on Web, Cloud.
- You also want switchroom installation.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or Samotics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and Samotics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or Samotics?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and Samotics at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or Samotics run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. Samotics runs on Web, Cloud.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what Samotics is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that Samotics cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. Samotics covers Electrical signature analysis, Switchroom installation, Energy and efficiency measurement, Submersible and hazardous area coverage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
Samotics: Does Samotics replace vibration monitoring?
For motor-driven assets it often does, and it reaches assets vibration cannot. For un-driven equipment and structures it does not apply at all.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
Samotics: Do I have to buy Samotics hardware?
Yes. SAM4 requires the vendor's sensors fitted in the motor control centre; there is no software-only option.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
Samotics: Does it work on variable-speed drives?
It can, but performance depends on the drive and the operating profile. Pilot it on your own VSD assets rather than accepting a reference from a direct-on-line site.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
Samotics: How is it priced?
Subscription per monitored asset, quoted, typically on a multi-year term, with hardware and electrical installation on top.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs MOVUS
- Materialise Magics vs Poseidon Systems
- Materialise Magics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Materialise Magics vs Petasense
- Materialise Magics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Materialise Magics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs Augury
- Materialise Magics vs KCF Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Materialise Magics vs eMaint
- Materialise Magics vs PROGNOST Systems
- Samotics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Samotics vs Oqton
- Samotics vs GrabCAD Print
- Samotics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Samotics vs Simplify3D
- Samotics vs Markforged Eiger
- Samotics vs SolidWorks
- Samotics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Samotics vs 3YOURMIND
- Samotics vs Aras Innovator
- Samotics vs Authentise
- Samotics vs Dyndrite
- Samotics vs QAD Redzone
- Samotics vs Seeq
- Samotics vs Sensemore
- Samotics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Samotics vs TrendMiner
- Samotics vs MOVUS
- Samotics vs Poseidon Systems
- Samotics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Samotics vs Petasense
- Samotics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Samotics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Samotics vs Augury
- Samotics vs KCF Technologies
- Samotics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Samotics vs eMaint
- Samotics vs PROGNOST Systems
