Logistics · head to head
Locate2u vs Turvo

Locate2u
Logistics
One platform fee for route optimization, fleet visibility and proof of delivery
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Turvo
Logistics
Collaborative TMS for freight brokers and 3PLs, owned by cold chain operator Lineage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Locate2u pricing quoted in AUD, not USD, requiring currency conversion for US customers; Turvo turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Locate2u and Turvo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Locate2u
Nothing recorded that Turvo does not also cover.
Only in Turvo
- Shared shipment feed
- Order and load management
- Carrier sourcing
- Driver mobile app
- Accounting and settlement
- Open API
- Analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Locate2u
- Planning optimized multi-stop routes in secondsnot Turvo
- Real-time GPS fleet visibility and trackingnot Turvo
- Proof of delivery via signature and photo capturenot Turvo
- Branded customer tracking and automated notificationsnot Turvo
Turvo
- A mid-sized freight brokerage trying to raise loads per operator without adding dispatch headcountnot Locate2u
- A 3PL that wants its shipper customers to see live load status without building and maintaining a customer portalnot Locate2u
- A shipper with an in-house brokerage arm needing one system for both managed transport and purchased capacitynot Locate2u
- A carrier-facing operation replacing email and phone check calls with structured status events tied to the load recordnot Locate2u
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Locate2u
- Pricing quoted in AUD, not USD, requiring currency conversion for US customers
- Starting price is AUD 1,100/month (approximately USD 730), significantly higher than many competitors
Turvo
- Turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- No pricing is published and third-party figures vary by an order of magnitude, from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a month, which makes early budgeting guesswork.
- The collaboration model only pays off if counterparties actually log in; brokers whose shippers and carriers stay on email get the cost of the platform without the headcount benefit.
- Accounting and settlement are functional but thinner than dedicated brokerage back-office systems, so many customers still run a separate finance package and reconcile between them.
- Coverage is North American truckload and less-than-truckload first; international, ocean and customs workflows are weak, so it does not suit a forwarder-led business.
Pricing, plan by plan
Locate2u
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Locate2u review.
Turvo
On request- Turvo TMS$undefined/year
- Quoted by user count and load volume
- Implementation, data migration and training scoped separately
- Annual contracts with tiered support
Which should you pick?
Choose Locate2u if
Nothing in the data separates Locate2u from Turvo on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Choose Turvo if
- You need shared shipment feed.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want order and load management.
Questions people ask
- Is Locate2u or Turvo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Locate2u starts at On request and Turvo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Locate2u or Turvo?
- Locate2u starts at On request and Turvo at On request.
- Does Locate2u or Turvo run on more platforms?
- Locate2u runs on Web. Turvo runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Locate2u best used for?
- Locate2u is most often used for planning optimized multi-stop routes in seconds, real-time gps fleet visibility and tracking, proof of delivery via signature and photo capture, branded customer tracking and automated notifications. Of those, planning optimized multi-stop routes in seconds and real-time gps fleet visibility and tracking are not what Turvo is typically brought in for.
- What can Locate2u do that Turvo cannot?
- Turvo covers Shared shipment feed, Order and load management, Carrier sourcing, Driver mobile app.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Locate2u: How much does Locate2u cost?
Locate2u's Platform plan starts at AUD 1,100/month (approximately USD 730) and scales with functionality. The Enterprise plan requires a custom quote. Optional modules for AI Agents, White Label, and API/Integrations are priced separately.
SourceTurvo: Who owns Turvo?
Lineage Logistics, together with Bay Grove, acquired Turvo in June 2022. It operates as a wholly owned subsidiary and still sells under the Turvo brand.
Locate2u: Does Locate2u offer a free trial?
Yes, Locate2u offers a free trial period with no credit card required and full feature access to evaluate the platform before committing to a paid plan.
SourceTurvo: Is Turvo a TMS or a visibility tool?
It is a TMS with collaboration and visibility built in, rather than a visibility layer bolted onto a separate TMS.
Locate2u: Are there additional costs for Locate2u add-ons?
Yes, optional modules are priced separately including AI Agents for dispatch and customer service, White Label custom branding, and API/Integrations for REST API and webhooks. All modules can be added to either Platform or Enterprise plans.
SourceTurvo: Does it publish pricing?
No. Quotes are built from user counts and load volume, and implementation is separate.
Turvo: Is it suitable for a shipper with no brokerage?
It can be, but the design assumes buying capacity from many carriers. A shipper with a small dedicated fleet gets less from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Locate2u vs Deliverr
- Locate2u vs AfterShip
- Locate2u vs Cargoson
- Locate2u vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Locate2u vs Detrack
- Locate2u vs Onfleet
- Locate2u vs Deposco
- Locate2u vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Locate2u vs Alpega
- Locate2u vs Manhattan Associates
- Locate2u vs Softeon
- Locate2u vs Transporeon
- Locate2u vs Truckbase
- Locate2u vs Trucker Path
- Locate2u vs Uber
- Locate2u vs Uber Freight
- Locate2u vs Veeqo
- Locate2u vs CargoWise
- Locate2u vs Rose Rocket
- Locate2u vs Alvys
- Locate2u vs Loadsmart
- Locate2u vs Transfix
- Locate2u vs McLeod Software
- Locate2u vs Descartes Aljex
- Locate2u vs Logiwa
- Locate2u vs ShipBob
- Locate2u vs ShipHero
- Locate2u vs Shippo
- Locate2u vs ShipStation
- Turvo vs Deliverr
- Turvo vs AfterShip
- Turvo vs Cargoson
- Turvo vs CWILL Post-Purchase
- Turvo vs Detrack
- Turvo vs Onfleet
- Turvo vs Deposco
- Turvo vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Turvo vs Alpega
- Turvo vs Manhattan Associates
- Turvo vs Softeon
- Turvo vs Transporeon
- Turvo vs Truckbase
- Turvo vs Trucker Path
- Turvo vs Uber
- Turvo vs Uber Freight
- Turvo vs Veeqo
- Turvo vs CargoWise
- Turvo vs Rose Rocket
- Turvo vs Alvys
- Turvo vs Loadsmart
- Turvo vs Transfix
- Turvo vs McLeod Software
- Turvo vs Descartes Aljex
- Turvo vs Logiwa
- Turvo vs ShipBob
- Turvo vs ShipHero
- Turvo vs Shippo
- Turvo vs ShipStation
