Cybersecurity · head to head
Legit Security vs Resolver

Legit Security
Cybersecurity
AI-native ASPM platform securing AI-generated code before deployment
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Legit Security pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult; Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- They diverge on capability: Legit Security covers VibeGuard AI code scanning, Resolver covers Incident management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Legit Security and Resolver actually diverge.
| Attribute | Legit Security | Resolver |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Contact sales for custom pricing | quote |
| Platforms | Web, IDE, CI/CD | Web, iOS, Android |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Legit Security
- VibeGuard AI code scanning
- Unified vulnerability remediation
- Code Security (SAST/SCA)
- Secrets detection and prevention
- Software Supply Chain Security
- Code change detection
- AI-powered remediation
- Risk scoring
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Legit Security
- Securing AI-generated code from GitHub Copilot and IDE assistantsnot Resolver
- Consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple AppSec toolsnot Resolver
- Preventing credential leaks across development workspacesnot Resolver
- Automating remediation workflows with AI-powered suggestionsnot Resolver
- Compliance automation with SBOM generation and enforcementnot Resolver
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Legit Security
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Legit Security
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Legit Security
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Legit Security
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Legit Security
- Pricing requires contacting sales, making cost comparison difficult
- No published pricing tiers or free tier available
- Requires integration with existing SAST and SCA tools for full capability
- Focused primarily on code security within development lifecycle
- Newer entrant with less market presence than established competitors
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Pricing, plan by plan
Legit Security
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Legit Security review.
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose Legit Security if
- You need vibeguard ai code scanning.
- You work on Web, IDE, CI/CD.
- You also want unified vulnerability remediation.
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Questions people ask
- Is Legit Security or Resolver better?
- Neither clearly leads. Legit Security starts at On request and Resolver at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Legit Security or Resolver?
- Legit Security starts at On request and Resolver at On request.
- Does Legit Security or Resolver run on more platforms?
- Legit Security runs on Web, IDE, CI/CD. Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Legit Security best used for?
- Legit Security is most often used for securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants, consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools, preventing credential leaks across development workspaces, automating remediation workflows with ai-powered suggestions. Of those, securing ai-generated code from github copilot and ide assistants and consolidating vulnerability findings from multiple appsec tools are not what Resolver is typically brought in for.
- What can Legit Security do that Resolver cannot?
- Legit Security covers VibeGuard AI code scanning, Unified vulnerability remediation, Code Security (SAST/SCA), Secrets detection and prevention. Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Legit Security: What is VibeGuard and how does it work?
VibeGuard is Legit Security's core feature that scans AI-generated code directly within IDEs like GitHub Copilot and Cursor, identifying vulnerabilities before code leaves the developer's editor.
SourceResolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Legit Security: What AI code assistants does Legit Security support?
Legit Security integrates with GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude to scan AI-generated code for vulnerabilities.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Legit Security: How does Legit Security's AI remediation feature work?
The platform uses AI to suggest specific code fixes for identified vulnerabilities and can automatically create tickets in Jira with full context for developers to review and apply.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Legit Security: Does Legit Security support compliance reporting?
Yes, Legit Security automates compliance automation with SBOM generation and can generate compliance reports for security and regulatory requirements.
SourceResolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
More on Legit Security
Other head to heads
- Legit Security vs Veracode
- Legit Security vs Snyk
- Legit Security vs Aikido
- Legit Security vs Delinea
- Legit Security vs Endor Labs
- Legit Security vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Legit Security vs Akeyless
- Legit Security vs Syft
- Legit Security vs IBM QRadar
- Legit Security vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Legit Security vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Legit Security vs HashiCorp Vault
- Legit Security vs MetricStream
- Legit Security vs Mimecast
- Legit Security vs Motorola Vigilant
- Legit Security vs Nessus
- Legit Security vs Microsoft Defender
- Legit Security vs LogicManager
- Legit Security vs Diligent
- Legit Security vs NICE Actimize
- Legit Security vs Omada Identity
- Legit Security vs Sardine
- Legit Security vs Silent Eight
- Legit Security vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Legit Security vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Legit Security vs OneTrust
- Legit Security vs Rhombus Systems
- Legit Security vs Trulioo
- Legit Security vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Legit Security vs ExpressVPN
- Legit Security vs Falco
- Legit Security vs Fenergo
- Legit Security vs Google Authenticator
- Legit Security vs Grype
- Resolver vs Veracode
- Resolver vs Snyk
- Resolver vs Aikido
- Resolver vs Delinea
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Resolver vs Akeyless
- Resolver vs Syft
- Resolver vs IBM QRadar
- Resolver vs Microsoft Sentinel
- Resolver vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Resolver vs HashiCorp Vault
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs Mimecast
- Resolver vs Motorola Vigilant
- Resolver vs Nessus
- Resolver vs Microsoft Defender
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
