Cybersecurity · head to head
Resolver vs Snyk

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Snyk has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.; Snyk free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- They diverge on capability: Resolver covers Incident management, Snyk covers Open source security.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Resolver and Snyk actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Only in Snyk
- Open source security
- Code security (SAST)
- Container security
- IaC security
- License compliance
- Fix PRs
- Priority scoring
- Developer IDE integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot Snyk
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot Snyk
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot Snyk
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot Snyk
Snyk
- Vulnerability scanningnot Resolver
- Application securitynot Resolver
- Infrastructure as Code securitynot Resolver
- Container securitynot Resolver
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
Snyk
- Free plan has strict test limits across all modules: Open Source (200), Code (100), Infrastructure as Code (300), Container (100) tests per month
- Free and Team plans count only contributing developers making commits within 90 days; public contributions do not count
- Enterprise plan requires custom pricing and sales contact
Pricing, plan by plan
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Snyk
Free- FreeFree
- SCA scanning
- SAST scanning
- IaC and Container scanning
- Team$25/month
- 1000 Code tests
- 100 projects
- Jira integration
- Ignite$105/month
- Unlimited tests
- Unlimited projects
- Custom security rules
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Zero-day prevention
- Unified AppSec control
- Full SDLC automation
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Choose Snyk if
- You need open source security.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- You also want code security (sast).
Questions people ask
- Is Resolver or Snyk better?
- Neither clearly leads. Resolver starts at On request and Snyk at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Resolver or Snyk?
- Snyk has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Resolver and Free for Snyk.
- Does Resolver or Snyk run on more platforms?
- Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android. Snyk runs on Web, CLI, IDE integrations.
- Can I use Snyk for free?
- Yes. Snyk has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Resolver best used for?
- Resolver is most often used for a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling, a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email, a university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single record, an organisation that already retains kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platform. Of those, a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling and a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email are not what Snyk is typically brought in for.
- What can Resolver do that Snyk cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit. Snyk covers Open source security, Code security (SAST), Container security, IaC security.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Snyk: How much does Snyk cost?
Snyk offers a free plan with limited tests, Team plan at $25/month per contributing developer, Ignite at $1260/year, and custom Enterprise pricing. Contributing developers are those who made commits to private repos within the last 90 days.
SourceResolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Snyk: What does Snyk's Team plan include?
The Team plan at $25/month includes 1000 Code tests, up to 100 projects, Jira integration, next business day support, and all features from the free plan including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning.
SourceResolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Snyk: Is there a free version of Snyk?
Yes, Snyk offers a free plan with full platform access including SCA, SAST, IaC and Container scanning. The free tier includes 200 Open Source tests, 100 Code tests, 300 IaC tests, 100 Container tests, and up to 5 projects.
SourceResolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs Aikido
- Resolver vs Trivy
- Resolver vs Arnica
- Resolver vs Chainguard
- Resolver vs Socket
- Resolver vs Endor Labs
- Resolver vs Legit Security
- Resolver vs 1Password
- Resolver vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Resolver vs Norton 360
- Resolver vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Resolver vs Infisical
- Resolver vs JumpCloud
- Resolver vs McAfee Total Protection
- Resolver vs Semgrep
- Snyk vs LogicManager
- Snyk vs Diligent
- Snyk vs MetricStream
- Snyk vs NICE Actimize
- Snyk vs Omada Identity
- Snyk vs Sardine
- Snyk vs Silent Eight
- Snyk vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Snyk vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Snyk vs OneTrust
- Snyk vs Rhombus Systems
- Snyk vs Trulioo
- Snyk vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Snyk vs ExpressVPN
- Snyk vs Falco
- Snyk vs Fenergo
- Snyk vs Google Authenticator
- Snyk vs Grype
- Snyk vs Aikido
- Snyk vs Trivy
- Snyk vs Arnica
- Snyk vs Chainguard
- Snyk vs Socket
- Snyk vs Endor Labs
- Snyk vs Legit Security
- Snyk vs 1Password
- Snyk vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Snyk vs Norton 360
- Snyk vs HashiCorp Boundary
- Snyk vs Infisical
- Snyk vs JumpCloud
- Snyk vs McAfee Total Protection
- Snyk vs Semgrep

