Softwr

CRM & Sales · head to head

LeadSquared vs Copper

LeadSquared logo

LeadSquared

CRM & Sales

Indian marketing automation and CRM platform for lead management

From
On request
Rated
-
Copper logo

Copper

CRM & Sales

Gmail-native CRM for growth teams

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Copper has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: LeadSquared both published plans cap seats at just 2 users, so any team larger than that must move to an unpublished custom plan; Copper the Basic plan caps at 2,500 contacts and 25 companies, which is small for a CRM at $23 per user per month

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which LeadSquared and Copper actually diverge.

Attributes where LeadSquared and Copper differ
AttributeLeadSquaredCopper
Starting priceOn requestFree
Free tierNoYes
FoundedUnknown2014

Identical on both: pricing model (subscription), platforms (Web), user rating (Not yet rated), category (CRM & Sales).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in LeadSquared

Nothing recorded that Copper does not also cover.

Only in Copper

  • Gmail integration
  • Contact management
  • Deal tracking
  • Pipeline management
  • Email tracking
  • Automation
  • Gmail
  • Google Calendar

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

LeadSquared

No use cases recorded yet. See the LeadSquared review.

Copper

  • CRM for teams working inside Google Workspacenot LeadSquared
  • Pipeline and deal trackingnot LeadSquared
  • Contact enrichment and activity capturenot LeadSquared
  • Workflow automation on the higher tiersnot LeadSquared

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

LeadSquared

  • Both published plans cap seats at just 2 users, so any team larger than that must move to an unpublished custom plan
  • Marketing Pro at $1,200/year limits emails to 100,000/month and storage to 2GB, with advanced automation types reserved for the $2,000/year Marketing Super plan

Copper

  • The Basic plan caps at 2,500 contacts and 25 companies, which is small for a CRM at $23 per user per month
  • Professional at $59 per user per month still caps at 15,000 contacts and 50 companies
  • Workflow automation, bulk email and reporting all require Professional
  • Email sequences, custom reports and multi-currency are Business tier only at $99 per user per month
  • The advertised prices are the annual rates; monthly billing runs from $29 to $134 per user

Pricing, plan by plan

LeadSquared

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the LeadSquared review.

Copper

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Contact management
    • Basic CRM
  • Starter$25/month
    • Everything in Free
    • Pipeline management
  • Professional$75/month
    • Everything in Starter
    • Automation
    • Advanced reporting

Which should you pick?

Choose LeadSquared if

Nothing in the data separates LeadSquared from Copper on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.

Choose Copper if

  • You need gmail integration.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want contact management.

Questions people ask

Is LeadSquared or Copper better?
Neither clearly leads. LeadSquared starts at On request and Copper at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, LeadSquared or Copper?
Copper has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for LeadSquared and Free for Copper.
Does LeadSquared or Copper run on more platforms?
Both run on Web, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
Can I use Copper for free?
Yes. Copper has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. LeadSquared starts at On request.
What can LeadSquared do that Copper cannot?
Copper covers Gmail integration, Contact management, Deal tracking, Pipeline management.

Related pages

Other head to heads