Logistics · head to head
Kuebix vs Turvo

Kuebix
Logistics
Shipper TMS known for its free tier, acquired by Trimble in 2020 and now sold inside the Trimble portfolio
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Turvo
Logistics
Collaborative TMS for freight brokers and 3PLs, owned by cold chain operator Lineage
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kuebix the free tier that made the product well known was the reason most buyers looked at it, and after the Trimble acquisition the entry level commercial terms are no longer what the widely circulated reviews describe, so any research older than the acquisition is misleading.; Turvo turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- They diverge on capability: Kuebix covers Rate shopping, Turvo covers Shared shipment feed.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kuebix and Turvo actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Logistics).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kuebix
- Rate shopping
- Booking and tendering
- Shipment tracking
- Freight audit support
- Community capacity
- Reporting
Only in Turvo
- Shared shipment feed
- Order and load management
- Carrier sourcing
- Driver mobile app
- Accounting and settlement
- Open API
- Analytics
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kuebix
- A small shipper with negotiated LTL rates that currently compares carriers in a spreadsheetnot Turvo
- A distributor wanting to check carrier invoices against quoted rates without buying a freight audit servicenot Turvo
- A shipper already invested in Trimble transportation technology and wanting the shipper side from the same vendornot Turvo
- A logistics team needing basic lane and carrier spend reporting without an enterprise TMS implementationnot Turvo
Turvo
- A mid-sized freight brokerage trying to raise loads per operator without adding dispatch headcountnot Kuebix
- A 3PL that wants its shipper customers to see live load status without building and maintaining a customer portalnot Kuebix
- A shipper with an in-house brokerage arm needing one system for both managed transport and purchased capacitynot Kuebix
- A carrier-facing operation replacing email and phone check calls with structured status events tied to the load recordnot Kuebix
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kuebix
- The free tier that made the product well known was the reason most buyers looked at it, and after the Trimble acquisition the entry level commercial terms are no longer what the widely circulated reviews describe, so any research older than the acquisition is misleading.
- Ownership by Trimble means the roadmap is set against a portfolio strategy centred on carrier and fleet technology, and shipper side investment competes internally with products that sell to a different customer.
- It is a rating and booking tool rather than a full transportation management system, so shippers with multi leg, international or complex allocation requirements outgrow it quickly.
- Rate accuracy depends on the shipper loading and maintaining its own carrier contracts, and stale rate tables produce confident quotes that the carrier invoice then contradicts.
- Support and account management now run through a large diversified vendor, and small shippers on entry level arrangements report less direct access than they had with the original company.
Turvo
- Turvo is owned by Lineage, a large cold storage and logistics operator, so competing 3PLs are placing operational and rate data with a platform under a competitor group; the separation is contractual, not structural.
- No pricing is published and third-party figures vary by an order of magnitude, from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a month, which makes early budgeting guesswork.
- The collaboration model only pays off if counterparties actually log in; brokers whose shippers and carriers stay on email get the cost of the platform without the headcount benefit.
- Accounting and settlement are functional but thinner than dedicated brokerage back-office systems, so many customers still run a separate finance package and reconcile between them.
- Coverage is North American truckload and less-than-truckload first; international, ocean and customs workflows are weak, so it does not suit a forwarder-led business.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kuebix
On request- Kuebix (Trimble Transportation)$undefined/year
- Shipper rating, booking and tracking
- Carrier rate management
- Reporting and freight audit support
Turvo
On request- Turvo TMS$undefined/year
- Quoted by user count and load volume
- Implementation, data migration and training scoped separately
- Annual contracts with tiered support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kuebix if
- You need rate shopping.
- You work on Web, API.
- You also want booking and tendering.
Choose Turvo if
- You need shared shipment feed.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- You also want order and load management.
Questions people ask
- Is Kuebix or Turvo better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kuebix starts at On request and Turvo at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kuebix or Turvo?
- Kuebix starts at On request and Turvo at On request.
- Does Kuebix or Turvo run on more platforms?
- Kuebix runs on Web, API. Turvo runs on Web, iOS, Android, API.
- What is Kuebix best used for?
- Kuebix is most often used for a small shipper with negotiated ltl rates that currently compares carriers in a spreadsheet, a distributor wanting to check carrier invoices against quoted rates without buying a freight audit service, a shipper already invested in trimble transportation technology and wanting the shipper side from the same vendor, a logistics team needing basic lane and carrier spend reporting without an enterprise tms implementation. Of those, a small shipper with negotiated ltl rates that currently compares carriers in a spreadsheet and a distributor wanting to check carrier invoices against quoted rates without buying a freight audit service are not what Turvo is typically brought in for.
- What can Kuebix do that Turvo cannot?
- Kuebix covers Rate shopping, Booking and tendering, Shipment tracking, Freight audit support. Turvo covers Shared shipment feed, Order and load management, Carrier sourcing, Driver mobile app.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kuebix: Is Kuebix still free?
Do not assume so. The free community tier was central to the original company and the terms changed after Trimble acquired the business in 2020. Confirm current availability with Trimble.
Turvo: Who owns Turvo?
Lineage Logistics, together with Bay Grove, acquired Turvo in June 2022. It operates as a wholly owned subsidiary and still sells under the Turvo brand.
Kuebix: Who owns Kuebix?
Trimble Inc., which acquired it in 2020.
Turvo: Is Turvo a TMS or a visibility tool?
It is a TMS with collaboration and visibility built in, rather than a visibility layer bolted onto a separate TMS.
Kuebix: Is it a full TMS?
It is strongest at LTL rate shopping, booking and tracking. Complex multimodal planning is not its territory.
Turvo: Does it publish pricing?
No. Quotes are built from user counts and load volume, and implementation is separate.
Kuebix: Does it work with my own carrier contracts?
Yes, that is the core use case, but you are responsible for keeping the rate tables current.
Turvo: Is it suitable for a shipper with no brokerage?
It can be, but the design assumes buying capacity from many carriers. A shipper with a small dedicated fleet gets less from it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kuebix vs Descartes Systems
- Kuebix vs Freightview
- Kuebix vs Shipwell
- Kuebix vs Rose Rocket
- Kuebix vs Uber Freight
- Kuebix vs Loadsmart
- Kuebix vs Manhattan Associates
- Kuebix vs McLeod Software
- Kuebix vs Alpega
- Kuebix vs Alvys
- Kuebix vs SpireStock
- Kuebix vs Transfix
- Kuebix vs Truckbase
- Kuebix vs Trucker Path
- Kuebix vs Uber
- Kuebix vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Kuebix vs Transporeon
- Kuebix vs Descartes Aljex
- Kuebix vs Logiwa
- Kuebix vs CargoWise
- Kuebix vs ShipBob
- Kuebix vs Deposco
- Kuebix vs Veeqo
- Kuebix vs Onfleet
- Kuebix vs ShipHero
- Kuebix vs Shippo
- Kuebix vs ShipStation
- Turvo vs Descartes Systems
- Turvo vs Freightview
- Turvo vs Shipwell
- Turvo vs Rose Rocket
- Turvo vs Uber Freight
- Turvo vs Loadsmart
- Turvo vs Manhattan Associates
- Turvo vs McLeod Software
- Turvo vs Alpega
- Turvo vs Alvys
- Turvo vs SpireStock
- Turvo vs Transfix
- Turvo vs Truckbase
- Turvo vs Trucker Path
- Turvo vs Uber
- Turvo vs Descartes MacroPoint
- Turvo vs Transporeon
- Turvo vs Descartes Aljex
- Turvo vs Logiwa
- Turvo vs CargoWise
- Turvo vs ShipBob
- Turvo vs Deposco
- Turvo vs Veeqo
- Turvo vs Onfleet
- Turvo vs ShipHero
- Turvo vs Shippo
- Turvo vs ShipStation
