APIs · head to head
Kong vs Pusher

Pusher
APIs
Realtime messaging API for building live features into apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Pusher the free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Pusher covers Pub/sub channels.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Pusher actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Pusher
- Pub/sub channels
- Presence channels
- Client libraries
- Webhooks
- 24/7 monitoring
- Priority support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot Pusher
- API development and testingnot Pusher
- Enterprise API security and governancenot Pusher
Pusher
- Adding live chat to a web or mobile appnot Kong
- Showing realtime presence of online usersnot Kong
- Pushing live notifications or dashboard updatesnot Kong
- Building collaborative features without managing WebSocket serversnot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pusher
- The free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- Pricing jumps sharply between tiers (e.g. $49 to $99 to $299), leaving few options for teams with moderate but growing usage.
- Priority support with faster response times costs an additional $3,000/month on top of plan pricing.
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Pusher
Free- SandboxFree
- 200k messages/day
- 100 concurrent connections
- Standard support
- Startup$49/month
- 1M messages/day
- 500 concurrent connections
- Pro$99/month
- 4M messages/day
- 2,000 concurrent connections
- Business$299/month
- 10M messages/day
- 5,000 concurrent connections
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Pusher if
- You need pub/sub channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Pusher better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Pusher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Pusher?
- Kong starts at Free and Pusher at Free.
- Does Kong or Pusher run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what Pusher is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Pusher cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourcePusher: What does Pusher cost?
Pusher Channels offers a free Sandbox plan (200k messages/day, 100 connections) and paid plans starting at $49/month for Startup, scaling up through Pro, Business, and several higher tiers up to $1,199/month, plus custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourcePusher: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, customers can log into the dashboard and adjust their plan at any time, including upgrading, downgrading, or cancelling.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourcePusher: How is usage metered?
Usage is measured by concurrent connections and messages per day; a message counts both the publish and each delivery, so publishing one message to 50 subscribers counts as 51 messages.
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Ably
- Kong vs PubNub
- Kong vs Svix
- Kong vs Apollo GraphQL
- Kong vs Zeplo
- Kong vs Backbase
- Kong vs Temenos Transact
- Kong vs Episode Six
- Kong vs Skaleet
- Kong vs Backendless
- Kong vs Boomi API Management
- Kong vs Codat
- Kong vs curl
- Kong vs Fintech Farm
- Kong vs Fintecture
- Kong vs Formance
- Pusher vs Convoy
- Pusher vs PocketBase
- Pusher vs Appwrite
- Pusher vs Hasura
- Pusher vs Sanity
- Pusher vs Tyk
- Pusher vs WSO2 API Manager
- Pusher vs Gravitee
- Pusher vs Janus Gateway
- Pusher vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Pusher vs 3scale
- Pusher vs Akana
- Pusher vs Enable Banking
- Pusher vs Flybits
- Pusher vs i2c
- Pusher vs KeystoneJS
- Pusher vs Liveblocks
- Pusher vs Moesif
- Pusher vs Ably
- Pusher vs PubNub
- Pusher vs Svix
- Pusher vs Apollo GraphQL
- Pusher vs Zeplo
- Pusher vs Backbase
- Pusher vs Temenos Transact
- Pusher vs Episode Six
- Pusher vs Skaleet
- Pusher vs Backendless
- Pusher vs Boomi API Management
- Pusher vs Codat
- Pusher vs curl
- Pusher vs Fintech Farm
- Pusher vs Fintecture
- Pusher vs Formance

