APIs · head to head
PocketBase vs Pusher

PocketBase
APIs
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Pusher
APIs
Realtime messaging API for building live features into apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PocketBase requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain; Pusher the free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- They diverge on capability: PocketBase covers REST API, Pusher covers Pub/sub channels.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PocketBase and Pusher actually diverge.
| Attribute | PocketBase | Pusher |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Unknown | freemium |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD | web, ios, android, api |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PocketBase
- REST API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- File storage
- Go support
- Docker support
- Self-hosted support
Only in Pusher
- Pub/sub channels
- Presence channels
- Client libraries
- 24/7 monitoring
- Priority support
Both cover
- Webhooks
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Pusher
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Pusher
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Pusher
- File storage and media attachment managementnot Pusher
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Pusher
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Pusher
Pusher
- Adding live chat to a web or mobile appnot PocketBase
- Showing realtime presence of online usersnot PocketBase
- Pushing live notifications or dashboard updatesnot PocketBase
- Building collaborative features without managing WebSocket serversnot PocketBase
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PocketBase
- Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- No built-in hosting provided
- Community support only
Pusher
- The free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- Pricing jumps sharply between tiers (e.g. $49 to $99 to $299), leaving few options for teams with moderate but growing usage.
- Priority support with faster response times costs an additional $3,000/month on top of plan pricing.
Pricing, plan by plan
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
Pusher
Free- SandboxFree
- 200k messages/day
- 100 concurrent connections
- Standard support
- Startup$49/month
- 1M messages/day
- 500 concurrent connections
- Pro$99/month
- 4M messages/day
- 2,000 concurrent connections
- Business$299/month
- 10M messages/day
- 5,000 concurrent connections
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose PocketBase if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Choose Pusher if
- You need pub/sub channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence channels.
Questions people ask
- Is PocketBase or Pusher better?
- Neither clearly leads. PocketBase starts at Free and Pusher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PocketBase or Pusher?
- PocketBase starts at Free and Pusher at Free.
- Does PocketBase or Pusher run on more platforms?
- PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD. Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use PocketBase for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is PocketBase best used for?
- PocketBase is most often used for embedded realtime database with rest api, backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments, rapid application development with email/oauth2 authentication, file storage and media attachment management. Of those, embedded realtime database with rest api and backend-as-a-service for single-file deployments are not what Pusher is typically brought in for.
- What can PocketBase do that Pusher cannot?
- PocketBase covers REST API, Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite. Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, 24/7 monitoring. Both handle Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PocketBase: How much does PocketBase cost?
PocketBase is completely free and open-source. It is a self-hosted backend solution with database, authentication, and file storage capabilities at no cost.
SourcePusher: What does Pusher cost?
Pusher Channels offers a free Sandbox plan (200k messages/day, 100 connections) and paid plans starting at $49/month for Startup, scaling up through Pro, Business, and several higher tiers up to $1,199/month, plus custom Enterprise pricing.
SourcePocketBase: Is PocketBase open-source?
Yes, PocketBase is open-source software. You can download, modify, and deploy it yourself at no cost with no licensing restrictions.
SourcePusher: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, customers can log into the dashboard and adjust their plan at any time, including upgrading, downgrading, or cancelling.
SourcePusher: How is usage metered?
Usage is measured by concurrent connections and messages per day; a message counts both the publish and each delivery, so publishing one message to 50 subscribers counts as 51 messages.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- PocketBase vs Appwrite
- PocketBase vs Hasura
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs HTTPie
- PocketBase vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Directus
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Hoppscotch
- PocketBase vs Janus Gateway
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Kong
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs Yapily
- PocketBase vs 10x Banking
- PocketBase vs Brite Payments
- PocketBase vs Bud Financial
- PocketBase vs Ably
- PocketBase vs PubNub
- PocketBase vs Liveblocks
- PocketBase vs Svix
- PocketBase vs Apollo GraphQL
- PocketBase vs Zeplo
- PocketBase vs Backbase
- PocketBase vs Temenos Transact
- PocketBase vs Episode Six
- PocketBase vs Skaleet
- PocketBase vs i2c
- PocketBase vs Boomi API Management
- PocketBase vs Codat
- PocketBase vs curl
- PocketBase vs Fintech Farm
- PocketBase vs Fintecture
- PocketBase vs Formance
- Pusher vs Appwrite
- Pusher vs Hasura
- Pusher vs Bruno
- Pusher vs HTTPie
- Pusher vs Backendless
- Pusher vs Directus
- Pusher vs Strapi
- Pusher vs Hoppscotch
- Pusher vs Janus Gateway
- Pusher vs KeystoneJS
- Pusher vs Kong
- Pusher vs Thunder Client
- Pusher vs Yapily
- Pusher vs 10x Banking
- Pusher vs Brite Payments
- Pusher vs Bud Financial
- Pusher vs Ably
- Pusher vs PubNub
- Pusher vs Liveblocks
- Pusher vs Svix
- Pusher vs Apollo GraphQL
- Pusher vs Zeplo
- Pusher vs Backbase
- Pusher vs Temenos Transact
- Pusher vs Episode Six
- Pusher vs Skaleet
- Pusher vs i2c
- Pusher vs Boomi API Management
- Pusher vs Codat
- Pusher vs curl
- Pusher vs Fintech Farm
- Pusher vs Fintecture
- Pusher vs Formance
