APIs · head to head
Pusher vs Spring Cloud Gateway

Pusher
APIs
Realtime messaging API for building live features into apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Spring Cloud Gateway
APIs
API gateway built on Project Reactor for building microservices
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Pusher the free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.; Spring Cloud Gateway released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
- They diverge on capability: Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Pusher and Spring Cloud Gateway actually diverge.
| Attribute | Pusher | Spring Cloud Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | web, ios, android, api | Java, Spring Boot |
| Founded | Unknown | 1998 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Pusher
- Pub/sub channels
- Presence channels
- Client libraries
- Webhooks
- 24/7 monitoring
- Priority support
Only in Spring Cloud Gateway
- Routing
- Path Rewriting
- Circuit Breaker
- Spring Boot
- Spring Security
- Spring Cloud
- Java support
- Spring Boot support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Pusher
- Adding live chat to a web or mobile appnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Showing realtime presence of online usersnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Pushing live notifications or dashboard updatesnot Spring Cloud Gateway
- Building collaborative features without managing WebSocket serversnot Spring Cloud Gateway
Spring Cloud Gateway
- API Developmentnot Pusher
- API Gatewaynot Pusher
- API Testingnot Pusher
- API Documentationnot Pusher
- Microservicesnot Pusher
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Pusher
- The free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- Pricing jumps sharply between tiers (e.g. $49 to $99 to $299), leaving few options for teams with moderate but growing usage.
- Priority support with faster response times costs an additional $3,000/month on top of plan pricing.
Spring Cloud Gateway
- Released under the Apache 2.0 license, free and open source with no commercial tier
Pricing, plan by plan
Pusher
Free- SandboxFree
- 200k messages/day
- 100 concurrent connections
- Standard support
- Startup$49/month
- 1M messages/day
- 500 concurrent connections
- Pro$99/month
- 4M messages/day
- 2,000 concurrent connections
- Business$299/month
- 10M messages/day
- 5,000 concurrent connections
- Premium support
Spring Cloud Gateway
Free- Open SourceFree
- Core Spring Cloud Gateway
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Pusher if
- You need pub/sub channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence channels.
Choose Spring Cloud Gateway if
- You need routing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Java, Spring Boot.
- You also want path rewriting.
Questions people ask
- Is Pusher or Spring Cloud Gateway better?
- Neither clearly leads. Pusher starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Pusher or Spring Cloud Gateway?
- Pusher starts at Free and Spring Cloud Gateway at Free.
- Does Pusher or Spring Cloud Gateway run on more platforms?
- Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api. Spring Cloud Gateway runs on Java, Spring Boot.
- Can I use Pusher for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Pusher best used for?
- Pusher is most often used for adding live chat to a web or mobile app, showing realtime presence of online users, pushing live notifications or dashboard updates, building collaborative features without managing websocket servers. Of those, adding live chat to a web or mobile app and showing realtime presence of online users are not what Spring Cloud Gateway is typically brought in for.
- What can Pusher do that Spring Cloud Gateway cannot?
- Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, Webhooks. Spring Cloud Gateway covers Routing, Path Rewriting, Circuit Breaker, Spring Boot.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pusher: What does Pusher cost?
Pusher Channels offers a free Sandbox plan (200k messages/day, 100 connections) and paid plans starting at $49/month for Startup, scaling up through Pro, Business, and several higher tiers up to $1,199/month, plus custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: Is Spring Cloud Gateway free?
Yes, Spring Cloud Gateway is free and open-source software. It is part of the Spring ecosystem and available through GitHub repositories with open-source dependencies like spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webflux and spring-cloud-starter-gateway-server-webmvc.
SourcePusher: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, customers can log into the dashboard and adjust their plan at any time, including upgrading, downgrading, or cancelling.
SourceSpring Cloud Gateway: What enterprise support is available for Spring Cloud Gateway?
Tanzu Spring provides optional enterprise support including Day 0 access to security patches for organizations requiring guaranteed support, but specific pricing is not published on the Spring Cloud Gateway project page.
SourcePusher: How is usage metered?
Usage is measured by concurrent connections and messages per day; a message counts both the publish and each delivery, so publishing one message to 50 subscribers counts as 51 messages.
SourceRelated pages
More on Spring Cloud Gateway
Other head to heads
- Pusher vs Ably
- Pusher vs PubNub
- Pusher vs Liveblocks
- Pusher vs Svix
- Pusher vs Apollo GraphQL
- Pusher vs Zeplo
- Pusher vs Backbase
- Pusher vs Temenos Transact
- Pusher vs Episode Six
- Pusher vs Skaleet
- Pusher vs Backendless
- Pusher vs i2c
- Pusher vs Boomi API Management
- Pusher vs Codat
- Pusher vs curl
- Pusher vs Fintech Farm
- Pusher vs Fintecture
- Pusher vs Formance
- Pusher vs Appwrite
- Pusher vs Hasura
- Pusher vs PocketBase
- Pusher vs Sanity
- Pusher vs Kong Gateway
- Pusher vs Tyk
- Pusher vs Janus Gateway
- Pusher vs Convoy
- Pusher vs WSO2 API Manager
- Pusher vs Gravitee
- Pusher vs KeystoneJS
- Pusher vs Strapi
- Pusher vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Pusher vs Thredd
- Pusher vs Thunder Client
- Pusher vs Toqio
- Pusher vs Kong
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Ably
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PubNub
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Liveblocks
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Svix
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Apollo GraphQL
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Zeplo
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Backbase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Temenos Transact
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Episode Six
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Skaleet
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Backendless
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs i2c
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Boomi API Management
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Codat
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs curl
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Fintech Farm
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Fintecture
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Formance
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Appwrite
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Hasura
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs PocketBase
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Sanity
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Tyk
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Janus Gateway
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Convoy
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Gravitee
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs KeystoneJS
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Strapi
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thredd
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Thunder Client
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Toqio
- Spring Cloud Gateway vs Kong
