Software · head to head
Appwrite vs Kong

Appwrite
Software
Open-source Backend as a Service with REST API and SDKs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Kong
Software
Cloud-native API gateway and service connectivity platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Appwrite smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Appwrite covers REST API, Kong covers API Gateway.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Appwrite and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Appwrite
- REST API
- Authentication
- Database
- Multiple SDKs
- Cloud functions
- File storage
- Self-hosted support
- Cloud support
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Both cover
- Docker support
- Kubernetes support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Appwrite
- API Developmentnot Kong
- API Gatewaynot Kong
- API Testingnot Kong
- API Documentationnot Kong
- Microservicesnot Kong
Kong
- Running an API gateway in front of internal and public servicesnot Appwrite
- Publishing and governing APIs through a developer portalnot Appwrite
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Appwrite
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Firebase; fewer third-party integrations and extensions
- Analytics, crash reporting, and A/B testing not included (Firebase includes these)
- Requires infrastructure management for self-hosted deployments; not fully managed like Firebase Cloud
- Mobile app support not as mature as Firebase's native iOS/Android SDKs
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Appwrite
Free- Cloud FreeFree
- 75K MAU
- 10GB storage
- Unlimited projects
- Cloud Pro$15/month
- More storage
- Priority support
Kong
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API gateway
- Community support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Appwrite if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker.
- You also want authentication.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Appwrite or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Appwrite starts at Free and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Appwrite or Kong?
- Appwrite starts at Free and Kong at Free.
- Does Appwrite or Kong run on more platforms?
- Appwrite runs on Cloud (Managed), Self-Hosted, Docker. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Appwrite for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Appwrite best used for?
- Appwrite is most often used for api development, api gateway, api testing, api documentation. Of those, api development and api gateway are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Appwrite do that Kong cannot?
- Appwrite covers REST API, Authentication, Database, Multiple SDKs. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Both handle Docker support, Kubernetes support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Appwrite: Can Appwrite be self-hosted?
Yes. Appwrite is fully open-source and self-hosted with a single Docker command. Self-hosting is completely free with no feature restrictions, unlike the managed Appwrite Cloud.
SourceAppwrite: What is Appwrite Cloud's pricing?
Appwrite Cloud offers a free tier with unlimited projects, 75K monthly active users, and 10GB storage with no time limit. Pro plan starts at $15/month per organization member. Scale plan at $599/month includes dedicated resources and SOC 2 compliance.
SourceAppwrite: What programming languages does Appwrite support?
Appwrite provides SDKs for 15+ languages including JavaScript, Flutter, Swift, Kotlin, Python, Ruby, PHP, .NET, and more, offering more language flexibility than Firebase.
SourceAppwrite: What backend services does Appwrite provide?
Appwrite includes Auth (with multi-factor auth), Databases, Storage (with compression and encryption), Serverless Functions, Messaging, Realtime subscriptions, and Sites (for hosting static and full-stack apps).
SourceAppwrite: Does Appwrite include real-time capabilities?
Yes. Appwrite's Realtime service covers all platform services by default through WebSocket subscriptions, enabling real-time updates across databases, functions, and messages.
SourceAppwrite: How does Appwrite compare to Firebase on costs?
Appwrite offers better cost predictability. Firebase's pay-per-read/write model can lead to unexpected bills with runaway queries, while Appwrite's self-hosted model only requires paying for your own infrastructure with completely predictable costs.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Appwrite vs Hasura
- Appwrite vs PocketBase
- Appwrite vs Sanity
- Appwrite vs Apigee
- Appwrite vs Bruno
- Appwrite vs KeystoneJS
- Appwrite vs Parse Server
- Appwrite vs Stoplight
- Appwrite vs Strapi
- Appwrite vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Appwrite vs Thunder Client
- Appwrite vs WSO2 API Manager
- Appwrite vs 3scale
- Appwrite vs Akana
- Appwrite vs Asyncapi
- Appwrite vs AWS API Gateway
- Appwrite vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Appwrite vs Backendless
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Apigee
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Stoplight
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Asyncapi
- Kong vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Kong vs Backendless
