APIs · head to head
i2c vs Kong

i2c
APIs
Configurable card issuing and banking processing platform for banks and programme managers
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: i2c developer experience lags API-native competitors, and teams expecting Stripe-grade documentation and sandboxes find an enterprise integration project instead.; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: i2c covers Configurable product engine, Kong covers API Gateway.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which i2c and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in i2c
- Configurable product engine
- Credit and instalments
- Multi-currency
- Fraud and risk tooling
- Digital banking front ends
- Global scheme connectivity
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
i2c
- A bank wanting credit, debit and prepaid portfolios on one processor rather than threenot Kong
- An issuer in a market where local scheme and currency support rules out US-centric processorsnot Kong
- A programme manager launching instalment products without building a lending corenot Kong
- A credit union replacing an ageing processor without writing custom code for product rulesnot Kong
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot i2c
- API development and testingnot i2c
- Enterprise API security and governancenot i2c
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
i2c
- Developer experience lags API-native competitors, and teams expecting Stripe-grade documentation and sandboxes find an enterprise integration project instead.
- Implementations lean on i2c or partner professional services, so timelines and costs are set by a services queue rather than by your own engineering speed.
- Pricing is per active card and per transaction with monthly minimums, none of it published, so comparing bids requires modelling your own portfolio carefully.
- Configuration flexibility means product behaviour lives in platform settings rather than in your repository, which complicates version control, testing and audit trails.
- As a private company with a broad global footprint, regional support depth is uneven, and a programme in a smaller market may get thinner service than a flagship account.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
i2c
On request- i2c processing platform$undefined/year
- Per-active-card and per-transaction processing fees
- Minimum monthly commitments by programme
- Implementation and configuration professional services
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
Which should you pick?
Choose i2c if
- You need configurable product engine.
- You work on Web, REST API.
- You also want credit and instalments.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is i2c or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. i2c starts at On request and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, i2c or Kong?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for i2c and Free for Kong.
- Does i2c or Kong run on more platforms?
- i2c runs on Web, REST API. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. i2c starts at On request.
- What is i2c best used for?
- i2c is most often used for a bank wanting credit, debit and prepaid portfolios on one processor rather than three, an issuer in a market where local scheme and currency support rules out us-centric processors, a programme manager launching instalment products without building a lending core, a credit union replacing an ageing processor without writing custom code for product rules. Of those, a bank wanting credit, debit and prepaid portfolios on one processor rather than three and an issuer in a market where local scheme and currency support rules out us-centric processors are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can i2c do that Kong cannot?
- i2c covers Configurable product engine, Credit and instalments, Multi-currency, Fraud and risk tooling. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
i2c: Does i2c issue the cards itself?
No. It processes; issuance sits with a bank or licensed issuer, and in most markets you need that relationship separately.
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
Sourcei2c: Can it handle revolving credit?
Yes. Credit, instalments and buy-now-pay-later sit on the same platform as debit and prepaid, which is unusual among modern processors.
Kong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
Sourcei2c: Is it self-serve?
No. Expect a configuration-led implementation with professional services rather than signing up and calling an API.
Kong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- i2c vs Marqeta
- i2c vs Enfuce
- i2c vs Highnote
- i2c vs Paymentology
- i2c vs Lithic
- i2c vs Episode Six
- i2c vs Tribe Payments
- i2c vs Mambu
- i2c vs Skaleet
- i2c vs Thredd
- i2c vs Temenos Transact
- i2c vs 10x Banking
- i2c vs PubNub
- i2c vs Svix
- i2c vs Synctera
- i2c vs Treblle
- i2c vs Convoy
- i2c vs PocketBase
- i2c vs Appwrite
- i2c vs Hasura
- i2c vs Sanity
- i2c vs Tyk
- i2c vs WSO2 API Manager
- i2c vs Gravitee
- i2c vs Janus Gateway
- i2c vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- i2c vs 3scale
- i2c vs Akana
- i2c vs Enable Banking
- i2c vs Flybits
- i2c vs KeystoneJS
- i2c vs Liveblocks
- i2c vs Moesif
- Kong vs Marqeta
- Kong vs Enfuce
- Kong vs Highnote
- Kong vs Paymentology
- Kong vs Lithic
- Kong vs Episode Six
- Kong vs Tribe Payments
- Kong vs Mambu
- Kong vs Skaleet
- Kong vs Thredd
- Kong vs Temenos Transact
- Kong vs 10x Banking
- Kong vs PubNub
- Kong vs Svix
- Kong vs Synctera
- Kong vs Treblle
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif

