Software · head to head
Akana vs Pusher
Pusher
Software
Realtime messaging API for building live features into apps
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Pusher has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Pusher the free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Pusher covers Pub/sub channels.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akana and Pusher actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akana
- API Lifecycle Management
- API Security
- Governance Controls
- OAuth
- SAML
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- Cloud support
Only in Pusher
- Pub/sub channels
- Presence channels
- Client libraries
- Webhooks
- 24/7 monitoring
- Priority support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akana
- API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Pusher
- Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Pusher
- Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Pusher
- Developer portal and API monetisationnot Pusher
- Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Pusher
Pusher
- Adding live chat to a web or mobile appnot Akana
- Showing realtime presence of online usersnot Akana
- Pushing live notifications or dashboard updatesnot Akana
- Building collaborative features without managing WebSocket serversnot Akana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akana
- Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered
Pusher
- The free Sandbox plan is capped at 100 concurrent connections, which is quickly outgrown by production apps.
- Pricing jumps sharply between tiers (e.g. $49 to $99 to $299), leaving few options for teams with moderate but growing usage.
- Priority support with faster response times costs an additional $3,000/month on top of plan pricing.
Pricing, plan by plan
Akana
$2500/monthly- Professional$2500/monthly
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- Basic analytics
- Enterprise$5000/monthly
- Advanced governance
- Multi-cloud support
- Premium support
- Custom$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantee
Pusher
Free- SandboxFree
- 200k messages/day
- 100 concurrent connections
- Standard support
- Startup$49/month
- 1M messages/day
- 500 concurrent connections
- Pro$99/month
- 4M messages/day
- 2,000 concurrent connections
- Business$299/month
- 10M messages/day
- 5,000 concurrent connections
- Premium support
Which should you pick?
Choose Akana if
- You need api lifecycle management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want api security.
Choose Pusher if
- You need pub/sub channels.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, ios, android, api.
- You also want presence channels.
Questions people ask
- Is Akana or Pusher better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Pusher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akana or Pusher?
- Pusher has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2500/monthly for Akana and Free for Pusher.
- Does Akana or Pusher run on more platforms?
- Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api.
- Can I use Pusher for free?
- Yes. Pusher has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akana starts at $2500/monthly.
- What is Akana best used for?
- Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Pusher is typically brought in for.
- What can Akana do that Pusher cannot?
- Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth. Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, Webhooks.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Pusher: What does Pusher cost?
Pusher Channels offers a free Sandbox plan (200k messages/day, 100 connections) and paid plans starting at $49/month for Startup, scaling up through Pro, Business, and several higher tiers up to $1,199/month, plus custom Enterprise pricing.
SourcePusher: Can I change or cancel my plan?
Yes, customers can log into the dashboard and adjust their plan at any time, including upgrading, downgrading, or cancelling.
SourcePusher: How is usage metered?
Usage is measured by concurrent connections and messages per day; a message counts both the publish and each delivery, so publishing one message to 50 subscribers counts as 51 messages.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Akana vs Appwrite
- Akana vs Hasura
- Akana vs PocketBase
- Akana vs Sanity
- Akana vs Apigee
- Akana vs Ably
- Akana vs Kong Gateway
- Akana vs PubNub
- Akana vs Treblle
- Akana vs Apollo GraphQL
- Akana vs Bruno
- Akana vs KeystoneJS
- Akana vs Moesif
- Akana vs Parse Server
- Akana vs Stainless
- Akana vs Stoplight
- Akana vs Strapi
- Akana vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Pusher vs Appwrite
- Pusher vs Hasura
- Pusher vs PocketBase
- Pusher vs Sanity
- Pusher vs Apigee
- Pusher vs Ably
- Pusher vs Kong Gateway
- Pusher vs PubNub
- Pusher vs Treblle
- Pusher vs Apollo GraphQL
- Pusher vs Bruno
- Pusher vs KeystoneJS
- Pusher vs Moesif
- Pusher vs Parse Server
- Pusher vs Stainless
- Pusher vs Stoplight
- Pusher vs Strapi
- Pusher vs Swagger/OpenAPI