API Management · head to head
Akana vs Kong

Akana
API Management
Enterprise API lifecycle management platform
- From
- $2500/monthly
- Rated
- -

Kong
API Management
Cloud-native API gateway and service connectivity platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Kong has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Akana owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com; Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- They diverge on capability: Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, Kong covers API Gateway.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Akana and Kong actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Akana
- API Lifecycle Management
- API Security
- Governance Controls
- OAuth
- SAML
- LDAP
- Active Directory
- Cloud support
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Akana
- API lifecycle management across REST, SOAP and GraphQLnot Kong
- Applying OAuth, JWT and SAML policies at the gatewaynot Kong
- Running the same platform on-premises, in Kubernetes or across cloudsnot Kong
- Developer portal and API monetisationnot Kong
- Monitoring API traffic and enforcing quotasnot Kong
Kong
- Running an API gateway in front of internal and public servicesnot Akana
- Publishing and governing APIs through a developer portalnot Akana
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Akana
- Owned by Perforce and sold within their portfolio rather than independently, and akana.com redirects to perforce.com
- Pricing is not published; only a 30 day trial is offered
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Pricing, plan by plan
Akana
$2500/monthly- Professional$2500/monthly
- API Gateway
- Developer Portal
- Basic analytics
- Enterprise$5000/monthly
- Advanced governance
- Multi-cloud support
- Premium support
- Custom$undefined/monthly
- Custom solutions
- Dedicated support
- SLA guarantee
Kong
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API gateway
- Community support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
Which should you pick?
Choose Akana if
- You need api lifecycle management.
- You work on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid.
- You also want api security.
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Questions people ask
- Is Akana or Kong better?
- Neither clearly leads. Akana starts at $2500/monthly and Kong at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Akana or Kong?
- Kong has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $2500/monthly for Akana and Free for Kong.
- Does Akana or Kong run on more platforms?
- Akana runs on Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid. Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Yes. Kong has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Akana starts at $2500/monthly.
- What is Akana best used for?
- Akana is most often used for api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql, applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway, running the same platform on-premises, in kubernetes or across clouds, developer portal and api monetisation. Of those, api lifecycle management across rest, soap and graphql and applying oauth, jwt and saml policies at the gateway are not what Kong is typically brought in for.
- What can Akana do that Kong cannot?
- Akana covers API Lifecycle Management, API Security, Governance Controls, OAuth. Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Akana vs Appwrite
- Akana vs Hasura
- Akana vs PocketBase
- Akana vs Sanity
- Akana vs Apigee
- Akana vs Bruno
- Akana vs KeystoneJS
- Akana vs Parse Server
- Akana vs Stoplight
- Akana vs Strapi
- Akana vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Akana vs Thunder Client
- Akana vs WSO2 API Manager
- Akana vs 3scale
- Akana vs Asyncapi
- Akana vs AWS API Gateway
- Akana vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Akana vs Backendless
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Apigee
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Stoplight
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Asyncapi
- Kong vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Kong vs Backendless
