Apollo GraphQL vs Pusher

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Pricing, plan by plan

Which should you pick?

Questions people ask

Is Apollo GraphQL or Pusher better?

Neither clearly leads. Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Pusher at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Apollo GraphQL or Pusher?

Apollo GraphQL starts at Free and Pusher at Free.

Does Apollo GraphQL or Pusher run on more platforms?

Apollo GraphQL runs on web, api. Pusher runs on web, ios, android, api.

Can I use Apollo GraphQL for free?

Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.

What is Apollo GraphQL best used for?

Apollo GraphQL is most often used for federating multiple backend services into one graphql api, wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption, enterprise api governance with schema checks and audit logs, reducing frontend over-fetching and under-fetching of data. Of those, federating multiple backend services into one graphql api and wrapping legacy rest apis for frontend consumption are not what Pusher is typically brought in for.

What can Apollo GraphQL do that Pusher cannot?

Apollo GraphQL covers Apollo Connectors, GraphOS Router, Schema registry, Schema checks. Pusher covers Pub/sub channels, Presence channels, Client libraries, Webhooks.