APIs · head to head
Kong vs PocketBase

PocketBase
APIs
Open-source backend with REST API, real-time subscriptions and Admin UI
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; PocketBase requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, PocketBase covers REST API.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and PocketBase actually diverge.
| Attribute | Kong | PocketBase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | subscription | Unknown |
| Platforms | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes | Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (APIs).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in PocketBase
- REST API
- Real-time subscriptions
- Admin UI
- SQLite
- Webhooks
- File storage
- Go support
- Self-hosted support
Both cover
- Docker support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- API gateway management and routingnot PocketBase
- API development and testingnot PocketBase
- Enterprise API security and governancenot PocketBase
PocketBase
- Embedded realtime database with REST APInot Kong
- Backend-as-a-service for single-file deploymentsnot Kong
- Rapid application development with email/OAuth2 authenticationnot Kong
- File storage and media attachment managementnot Kong
- Lightweight alternative to Firebase or traditional backend infrastructurenot Kong
- Go and JavaScript customisable application frameworknot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
PocketBase
- Requires technical expertise to deploy and maintain
- No built-in hosting provided
- Community support only
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- Kong Konnect Free TrialFree
- 30-day free trial
- Full enterprise functionality
- Unlimited gateways
- Kong Konnect Plus$null/month
- Per gateway pricing billed monthly
- Up to 5 Serverless Gateways, 2 Hybrid, 2 Dedicated Cloud Gateways
- 1M API requests included per month
- Kong Insomnia EssentialsFree
- Unlimited projects and CLI access
- Up to 3 Git Sync users
- 1,000 mock server requests per month
- Kong Insomnia Pro$12/month
- Unlimited users with Git Sync access
- Unlimited organizations
- RBAC
PocketBase
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the PocketBase review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose PocketBase if
- You need rest api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- You also want real-time subscriptions.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or PocketBase better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and PocketBase at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or PocketBase?
- Kong starts at Free and PocketBase at Free.
- Does Kong or PocketBase run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. PocketBase runs on Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for api gateway management and routing, api development and testing, enterprise api security and governance. Of those, api gateway management and routing and api development and testing are not what PocketBase is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that PocketBase cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. PocketBase covers REST API, Real-time subscriptions, Admin UI, SQLite. Both handle Docker support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Kong: Does Kong offer a free trial?
Yes, Kong Konnect offers a 30-day free trial with full enterprise functionality, unlimited gateways, and no credit card required.
SourcePocketBase: How much does PocketBase cost?
PocketBase is completely free and open-source. It is a self-hosted backend solution with database, authentication, and file storage capabilities at no cost.
SourceKong: How much does Kong Insomnia Pro cost?
Kong Insomnia Pro is $12 per user per month with 15% savings available for annual billing.
SourcePocketBase: Is PocketBase open-source?
Yes, PocketBase is open-source software. You can download, modify, and deploy it yourself at no cost with no licensing restrictions.
SourceKong: What are Kong Konnect Plus API request limits?
Kong Konnect Plus includes 1M API requests per month; additional requests cost $200 per 1M (maximum 10M per month).
SourceKong: What is included in Kong Insomnia Enterprise?
Kong Insomnia Enterprise is $45 per user per month with SSO, SCIM, vault integrations, unlimited mock server requests, and Konnect integration.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Convoy
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs Sanity
- Kong vs Tyk
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs Gravitee
- Kong vs Janus Gateway
- Kong vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Enable Banking
- Kong vs Flybits
- Kong vs i2c
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Liveblocks
- Kong vs Moesif
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs HTTPie
- Kong vs Backendless
- Kong vs Directus
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Hoppscotch
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs Yapily
- Kong vs 10x Banking
- Kong vs Brite Payments
- Kong vs Bud Financial
- PocketBase vs Convoy
- PocketBase vs Appwrite
- PocketBase vs Hasura
- PocketBase vs Sanity
- PocketBase vs Tyk
- PocketBase vs WSO2 API Manager
- PocketBase vs Gravitee
- PocketBase vs Janus Gateway
- PocketBase vs Spring Cloud Gateway
- PocketBase vs 3scale
- PocketBase vs Akana
- PocketBase vs Enable Banking
- PocketBase vs Flybits
- PocketBase vs i2c
- PocketBase vs KeystoneJS
- PocketBase vs Liveblocks
- PocketBase vs Moesif
- PocketBase vs Bruno
- PocketBase vs HTTPie
- PocketBase vs Backendless
- PocketBase vs Directus
- PocketBase vs Strapi
- PocketBase vs Hoppscotch
- PocketBase vs Thunder Client
- PocketBase vs Yapily
- PocketBase vs 10x Banking
- PocketBase vs Brite Payments
- PocketBase vs Bud Financial

