API Management · head to head
Kong vs Sanity

Kong
API Management
Cloud-native API gateway and service connectivity platform
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Sanity
API Management
Headless CMS with real-time collaborative editing and structured content APIs
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Kong the Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million; Sanity free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- They diverge on capability: Kong covers API Gateway, Sanity covers Content API.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Kong and Sanity actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (API Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Kong
- API Gateway
- Authentication & Authorization
- Rate Limiting
- Kubernetes
- Consul
- Eureka
- PostgreSQL
- Linux support
Only in Sanity
- Content API
- Collaborative editing
- Structured content
- Webhooks
- Third-party services
- GROQ query language
- Cloud support
- JavaScript SDK support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Kong
- Running an API gateway in front of internal and public servicesnot Sanity
- Publishing and governing APIs through a developer portalnot Sanity
Sanity
- Headless CMS for structured content managementnot Kong
- Collaborative content editing with real-time multiplayer supportnot Kong
- API-driven content delivery with GROQ query languagenot Kong
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Kong
- The Plus plan includes 1M API requests a month and charges $200 a month for each additional million
- Plus is capped at 10M requests a month, so growth past that forces an Enterprise contract
- Plus limits published APIs to 20 and includes one Developer Portal, with a second at $200 a month
- SSO and audit logging are Enterprise only
- Enterprise pricing is custom and billed annually
Sanity
- Free plan limited to 10,000 documents and 100GB assets
- Free plan supports only public datasets
- Growth plan capped at 50 seats maximum
- Private datasets, scheduled drafts, and comments/tasks require paid plans
- Annual billing unavailable for Growth plan; Enterprise-only
Pricing, plan by plan
Kong
Free- CommunityFree
- Core API gateway
- Community support
- Enterprise$undefined/monthly
- Advanced features
- Priority support
- SLA
Sanity
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Sanity review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Kong if
- You need api gateway.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want authentication & authorization.
Choose Sanity if
- You need content api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want collaborative editing.
Questions people ask
- Is Kong or Sanity better?
- Neither clearly leads. Kong starts at Free and Sanity at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Kong or Sanity?
- Kong starts at Free and Sanity at Free.
- Does Kong or Sanity run on more platforms?
- Kong runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Sanity runs on Web.
- Can I use Kong for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Kong best used for?
- Kong is most often used for running an api gateway in front of internal and public services, publishing and governing apis through a developer portal. Of those, running an api gateway in front of internal and public services and publishing and governing apis through a developer portal are not what Sanity is typically brought in for.
- What can Kong do that Sanity cannot?
- Kong covers API Gateway, Authentication & Authorization, Rate Limiting, Kubernetes. Sanity covers Content API, Collaborative editing, Structured content, Webhooks.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Kong vs Appwrite
- Kong vs Hasura
- Kong vs PocketBase
- Kong vs Apigee
- Kong vs Bruno
- Kong vs KeystoneJS
- Kong vs Parse Server
- Kong vs Stoplight
- Kong vs Strapi
- Kong vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Kong vs Thunder Client
- Kong vs WSO2 API Manager
- Kong vs 3scale
- Kong vs Akana
- Kong vs Asyncapi
- Kong vs AWS API Gateway
- Kong vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Kong vs Backendless
- Sanity vs Appwrite
- Sanity vs Hasura
- Sanity vs PocketBase
- Sanity vs Apigee
- Sanity vs Bruno
- Sanity vs KeystoneJS
- Sanity vs Parse Server
- Sanity vs Stoplight
- Sanity vs Strapi
- Sanity vs Swagger/OpenAPI
- Sanity vs Thunder Client
- Sanity vs WSO2 API Manager
- Sanity vs 3scale
- Sanity vs Akana
- Sanity vs Asyncapi
- Sanity vs AWS API Gateway
- Sanity vs Microsoft Azure API Management
- Sanity vs Backendless
