Cybersecurity · head to head
KnowBe4 vs OWASP ZAP

KnowBe4
Cybersecurity
World's largest security awareness training platform
- From
- $1/month
- Rated
- -

OWASP ZAP
Cybersecurity
Free, open-source web application scanner and intercepting proxy, now governed by the Software Security Project.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: KnowBe4 published prices assume a three year term, so the quoted per seat rate depends on a long commitment; OWASP ZAP authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- They diverge on capability: KnowBe4 covers Security awareness training, OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which KnowBe4 and OWASP ZAP actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in KnowBe4
- Security awareness training
- Phishing simulation
- Risk assessments
- Compliance training
- Incident reporting
- API access
- Custom policies
- Behavior analytics
Only in OWASP ZAP
- Intercepting proxy
- Passive scanner
- Active scanner
- AJAX spider
- Automation Framework
- Headless daemon and REST API
- Docker images
- Add-on marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
KnowBe4
- Security awareness training and simulated phishing for staffnot OWASP ZAP
- Tracking employee susceptibility to phishing over timenot OWASP ZAP
OWASP ZAP
- Adding a baseline security scan to every application's pipeline where per-target commercial licensing would limit coverage to a handfulnot KnowBe4
- Manual penetration testing that needs an intercepting proxy, request replay and fuzzing without a paid licence per testernot KnowBe4
- Teaching developers what an attack against their own endpoint looks like, using a tool they can install themselvesnot KnowBe4
- Pre-release regression scanning of an internal application that would never justify a commercial DAST subscriptionnot KnowBe4
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
KnowBe4
- Published prices assume a three year term, so the quoted per seat rate depends on a long commitment
- Pricing is banded by seat count, and the lowest band of 25 to 50 seats pays the highest rate
- Accounts above 1,000 seats have no published price and require a custom quote
- Third party integrations, Compliance Plus and PhishER Plus are all separately priced per seat add ons
- The Foundation tier carries 200 training modules against more than 1,000 on Advanced, so content volume is the main gate
OWASP ZAP
- Authenticated scanning of modern single-page applications is the hard part and ZAP makes you build it by hand: session handling, token refresh and login scripts are configured per application, and a misconfigured session means the scanner logs itself out and reports a clean result for pages it never reached.
- There is no support contract in the product, so when a scan breaks the day before a release the escalation path is a GitHub issue and a community chat, which is not an answer that satisfies a delivery manager or an auditor who wants a named responsible party.
- Active scanning sends genuine attack traffic, so it can create records, trigger emails, exhaust rate limits or destabilise a fragile environment, and pointing it at production without prior agreement produces an incident rather than a test result.
- Output needs triage: passive rules generate large volumes of low-severity informational findings about headers and cookie flags that bury the few results that matter, and a team without someone tuning the rule set stops reading the report within a few sprints.
- As a dynamic scanner it can only test what it can reach, so authorisation flaws between accounts, business logic abuse and anything behind an undiscovered endpoint go unreported, and a passing ZAP scan is evidence of nothing more than the absence of the classes of bug it looks for.
Pricing, plan by plan
KnowBe4
$1/month- Basic$1/month
- Per user
- Training modules
- Phishing templates
- Advanced$2/month
- All Basic features
- Advanced phishing
- Risk assessments
- Pro$3/month
- All Advanced features
- API access
- Custom content
OWASP ZAP
Free- Free & Open SourceFree
- Full functionality
- Active & passive scanning
- Spider
Which should you pick?
Choose KnowBe4 if
- You need security awareness training.
- You work on Web, Mobile, Email.
- You also want phishing simulation.
Choose OWASP ZAP if
- You need intercepting proxy.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- You also want passive scanner.
Questions people ask
- Is KnowBe4 or OWASP ZAP better?
- Neither clearly leads. KnowBe4 starts at $1/month and OWASP ZAP at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, KnowBe4 or OWASP ZAP?
- OWASP ZAP has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1/month for KnowBe4 and Free for OWASP ZAP.
- Does KnowBe4 or OWASP ZAP run on more platforms?
- KnowBe4 runs on Web, Mobile, Email. OWASP ZAP runs on Desktop, Cli, Api.
- Can I use OWASP ZAP for free?
- Yes. OWASP ZAP has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. KnowBe4 starts at $1/month.
- What is KnowBe4 best used for?
- KnowBe4 is most often used for security awareness training and simulated phishing for staff, tracking employee susceptibility to phishing over time. Of those, security awareness training and simulated phishing for staff and tracking employee susceptibility to phishing over time are not what OWASP ZAP is typically brought in for.
- What can KnowBe4 do that OWASP ZAP cannot?
- KnowBe4 covers Security awareness training, Phishing simulation, Risk assessments, Compliance training. OWASP ZAP covers Intercepting proxy, Passive scanner, Active scanner, AJAX spider.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
KnowBe4: What does KnowBe4 cost per employee?
KnowBe4 charges per seat per month on a subscription basis. For 51-100 employees, SAT Foundation costs $2.13/month per seat and SAT Advanced costs $3.40/month per seat. Prices decrease with larger employee counts.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it still called OWASP ZAP?
The project left OWASP in August 2024 and is now governed by the Software Security Project, with core development sponsored by Checkmarx. The tool is now just ZAP, though most existing documentation, courses and search results still use the OWASP name.
KnowBe4: Does KnowBe4 offer a free trial?
KnowBe4 does not offer a full free version, but free tools are available separately including assessments and simulators.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Is it free for commercial use?
Yes. It is Apache 2.0 licensed, with no per-application, per-scan or per-user cost, and it can be used and modified commercially without a licence agreement.
KnowBe4: Are there add-on costs beyond the base plan?
Yes, optional add-ons include Third-Party Integrations ($1.10-$1.20/seat/month), Compliance Plus ($0.82-$0.93/seat/month), PhishER Plus ($1.15-$1.50/seat/month), and Student Edition ($0.17/seat/month).
SourceOWASP ZAP: Can it replace a penetration test?
No. It automates checks for known vulnerability classes against endpoints it can reach. It does not reason about business logic, chain findings into an attack, or test authorisation between accounts, which is most of what a tester actually does.
KnowBe4: What currencies does KnowBe4 accept?
KnowBe4 accepts pricing in USD, AUD, BRL, CAD, EUR, GBP, SGD, and ZAR.
SourceOWASP ZAP: Does it run in CI?
Yes, through the official Docker images and the Automation Framework, which defines scan jobs in YAML so configuration lives in the repository. A baseline passive scan is the usual starting point because it is fast and non-intrusive.
OWASP ZAP: How does it compare to Burp Suite?
Burp Suite Professional is the more polished manual testing tool and has a stronger scanner and extension ecosystem, but it is licensed per tester and Burp Suite Enterprise per target. ZAP is the better fit where cost per target is the binding constraint; many teams use both.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- KnowBe4 vs Bitdefender Total Security
- KnowBe4 vs Norton 360
- KnowBe4 vs 1Password
- KnowBe4 vs LastPass
- KnowBe4 vs Nessus
- KnowBe4 vs Doppler
- KnowBe4 vs Chainguard
- KnowBe4 vs Mimecast
- KnowBe4 vs Fenergo
- KnowBe4 vs Netwrix
- KnowBe4 vs Omada Identity
- KnowBe4 vs Saviynt
- KnowBe4 vs Jamf Pro
- KnowBe4 vs Keeper Password Manager
- KnowBe4 vs Keygen
- KnowBe4 vs Legit Security
- KnowBe4 vs LogRhythm SIEM
- KnowBe4 vs Metasploit
- KnowBe4 vs Bitwarden
- KnowBe4 vs Burp Suite
- KnowBe4 vs Wireshark
- KnowBe4 vs authentik
- KnowBe4 vs Authelia
- KnowBe4 vs Infisical
- KnowBe4 vs Trivy
- KnowBe4 vs Feedzai
- KnowBe4 vs Frontegg
- KnowBe4 vs HashiCorp Boundary
- KnowBe4 vs JumpCloud
- KnowBe4 vs McAfee Total Protection
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitdefender Total Security
- OWASP ZAP vs Norton 360
- OWASP ZAP vs 1Password
- OWASP ZAP vs LastPass
- OWASP ZAP vs Nessus
- OWASP ZAP vs Doppler
- OWASP ZAP vs Chainguard
- OWASP ZAP vs Mimecast
- OWASP ZAP vs Fenergo
- OWASP ZAP vs Netwrix
- OWASP ZAP vs Omada Identity
- OWASP ZAP vs Saviynt
- OWASP ZAP vs Jamf Pro
- OWASP ZAP vs Keeper Password Manager
- OWASP ZAP vs Keygen
- OWASP ZAP vs Legit Security
- OWASP ZAP vs LogRhythm SIEM
- OWASP ZAP vs Metasploit
- OWASP ZAP vs Bitwarden
- OWASP ZAP vs Burp Suite
- OWASP ZAP vs Wireshark
- OWASP ZAP vs authentik
- OWASP ZAP vs Authelia
- OWASP ZAP vs Infisical
- OWASP ZAP vs Trivy
- OWASP ZAP vs Feedzai
- OWASP ZAP vs Frontegg
- OWASP ZAP vs HashiCorp Boundary
- OWASP ZAP vs JumpCloud
- OWASP ZAP vs McAfee Total Protection
