Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Windscribe

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
Windscribe
Cybersecurity
VPN and firewall service with a generous free data tier and a customizable Build-A-Plan option
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Windscribe free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Windscribe actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | Windscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Windscribe does not also cover.
Only in Windscribe
- Firewall / default block
- Unlimited simultaneous devices
- Build-A-Plan
- R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker
- Static IP and port forwarding add-ons
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Windscribe
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Windscribe
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Windscribe
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Windscribe
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Windscribe
Windscribe
- Running a free VPN across unlimited personal devicesnot Keycloak
- Buying access to just a few specific server locations cheaplynot Keycloak
- Blocking ads and trackers at the DNS level while browsingnot Keycloak
- Preventing IP leaks with a default-block firewall rulenot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Windscribe
- Free tier's 10GB cap still requires email confirmation and social sharing to unlock, unlike some no-strings-attached competitors.
- Build-A-Plan's low cost only covers selected locations, so broad global coverage still requires the full Pro plan.
- Server speeds and streaming reliability are inconsistent compared to larger premium VPN providers.
- Customer support is primarily ticket/community-based rather than live chat for lower tiers.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Windscribe
Free- FreeFree
- 10GB of data per month with confirmed email
- 10 server countries
- Unlimited devices
- Build-A-Plan$3/month
- Pay per selected server location ($1/location)
- $3 minimum purchase
- Unlimited data on selected locations
- Pro$9/month
- Unlimited data
- 69+ countries
- $69/year on annual billing
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Windscribe if
- You need firewall / default block.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- You also want unlimited simultaneous devices.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Windscribe better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Windscribe at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Windscribe?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Windscribe at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Windscribe run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Windscribe runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android, web.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Windscribe is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Windscribe cannot?
- Windscribe covers Firewall / default block, Unlimited simultaneous devices, Build-A-Plan, R.O.B.E.R.T. content blocker.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs TunnelBear
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Keycloak vs Surfshark
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs Avast One
- Keycloak vs CyberGhost VPN
- Keycloak vs IVPN
- Keycloak vs NordVPN
- Keycloak vs ProtonVPN
- Keycloak vs Osano
- Keycloak vs Syft
- Keycloak vs ThetaRay
- Keycloak vs Trivy
- Keycloak vs Trulioo
- Keycloak vs Unit21
- Keycloak vs Veracode
- Keycloak vs ExpressVPN
- Windscribe vs Penpot
- Windscribe vs Soketi
- Windscribe vs Ansible
- Windscribe vs Atlantis
- Windscribe vs Vite
- Windscribe vs Depot
- Windscribe vs Pants Build
- Windscribe vs Buildkite
- Windscribe vs Coder
- Windscribe vs Jitsu
- Windscribe vs Bitbucket
- Windscribe vs Sweep
- Windscribe vs Azure DevOps
- Windscribe vs Backstage
- Windscribe vs Claude Code
- Windscribe vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Windscribe vs Cody
- Windscribe vs TunnelBear
- Windscribe vs Private Internet Access
- Windscribe vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Windscribe vs Surfshark
- Windscribe vs Mullvad VPN
- Windscribe vs Avast One
- Windscribe vs CyberGhost VPN
- Windscribe vs IVPN
- Windscribe vs NordVPN
- Windscribe vs ProtonVPN
- Windscribe vs Osano
- Windscribe vs Syft
- Windscribe vs ThetaRay
- Windscribe vs Trivy
- Windscribe vs Trulioo
- Windscribe vs Unit21
- Windscribe vs Veracode
- Windscribe vs ExpressVPN
