Developer Tools · head to head
Backstage vs Passbolt

Backstage
Developer Tools
Open source internal developer portal framework created and open sourced by Spotify
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Backstage backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- They diverge on capability: Backstage covers Software catalogue, Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Backstage and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Backstage
- Software catalogue
- Software templates
- TechDocs
- Plugin architecture
- Kubernetes plugin
- Search
- Entity ownership model
- Auth provider integrations
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Backstage
- An engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morningnot Passbolt
- A platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, CI and security defaults already wired innot Passbolt
- A company consolidating scattered READMEs and Confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticednot Passbolt
- A regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classificationnot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Backstage
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Backstage
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Backstage
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Backstage
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Backstage
- Backstage is a framework rather than a product: there is no supported turnkey install, so getting to a usable portal means a TypeScript and React project your team owns, hosts and upgrades forever.
- Upstream releases move quickly and plugin APIs have broken across major versions, so a customised deployment accumulates upgrade debt and teams routinely fall months behind on versions they cannot cheaply catch up on.
- The catalogue is only as good as the YAML descriptors engineers remember to write; without enforcement the register drifts out of date, and a developer portal nobody trusts is abandoned faster than one that never existed.
- Community plugin quality varies sharply, with many unmaintained or pinned to old core versions, so the plugin that made the business case may be the one blocking your next upgrade.
- Spotify Portal, the packaged commercial route, publishes no price at all and is quoted as a custom annual subscription, so the only cost you can actually forecast up front is the self-hosted one, which is the option with the largest hidden staffing bill.
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Backstage
Free- Backstage (open source)Free
- Apache 2.0 licence
- Software catalogue, templates, TechDocs and search
- Full plugin ecosystem
- Spotify Portal for Backstage$undefined/year
- Packaged commercial distribution from Spotify
- Spotify premium plugins including Soundcheck and Insights
- Simplified setup and managed upgrade path
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose Backstage if
- You need software catalogue.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want software templates.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is Backstage or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Backstage starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Backstage or Passbolt?
- Backstage starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does Backstage or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- Backstage runs on Web, Self-hosted, Linux, Docker, Kubernetes. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use Backstage for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Backstage best used for?
- Backstage is most often used for an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning, a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in, a company consolidating scattered readmes and confluence pages into docs that live beside the code and cannot silently rot unnoticed, a regulated business that needs an auditable register of every running service, its owner and its data classification. Of those, an engineering organisation past roughly a hundred services where nobody can reliably answer who owns a given service at two in the morning and a platform team enforcing golden paths, so a new service is scaffolded with logging, ci and security defaults already wired in are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can Backstage do that Passbolt cannot?
- Backstage covers Software catalogue, Software templates, TechDocs, Plugin architecture. Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Backstage: Is Backstage free?
The project is Apache 2.0 with no licence fee. The real cost is engineering time; teams commonly dedicate one to two engineers permanently to running it.
Passbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceBackstage: Do I need to write code to use it?
Yes. Configuring and extending a Backstage application is a TypeScript and React project. This is the single most common misjudgement buyers make.
Passbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceBackstage: What is Spotify Portal for Backstage?
A commercial distribution from Spotify with premium plugins and support, generally available since October 2025 and sold as a quoted annual subscription with no published price.
Passbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceBackstage: Who owns the project?
Spotify created and open sourced it; it is now a CNCF project, so the upstream roadmap is not solely Spotify controlled.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Backstage vs Harness
- Backstage vs Cortex
- Backstage vs OpsLevel
- Backstage vs Tilt
- Backstage vs Ansible
- Backstage vs Frappe
- Backstage vs Refact
- Backstage vs Soketi
- Backstage vs Visual Studio Code
- Backstage vs Penpot
- Backstage vs GNU Emacs
- Backstage vs Bazel
- Backstage vs Argo CD
- Backstage vs Atlantis
- Backstage vs Blacksmith
- Backstage vs Coder
- Backstage vs Garden
- Backstage vs GitLab CI/CD
- Backstage vs Bitwarden
- Backstage vs LastPass
- Backstage vs authentik
- Backstage vs 1Password
- Backstage vs Authelia
- Backstage vs Enpass
- Backstage vs HashiCorp Vault
- Backstage vs Infisical
- Backstage vs Norton 360
- Backstage vs Semgrep
- Backstage vs Trivy
- Backstage vs Chainguard
- Backstage vs Trulioo
- Backstage vs Unit21
- Backstage vs Veracode
- Backstage vs Very Good Security
- Backstage vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Backstage vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Harness
- Passbolt vs Cortex
- Passbolt vs OpsLevel
- Passbolt vs Tilt
- Passbolt vs Ansible
- Passbolt vs Frappe
- Passbolt vs Refact
- Passbolt vs Soketi
- Passbolt vs Visual Studio Code
- Passbolt vs Penpot
- Passbolt vs GNU Emacs
- Passbolt vs Bazel
- Passbolt vs Argo CD
- Passbolt vs Atlantis
- Passbolt vs Blacksmith
- Passbolt vs Coder
- Passbolt vs Garden
- Passbolt vs GitLab CI/CD
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
