Cloud · head to head
Cerebrium vs Jaeger

Cerebrium
Cloud
Serverless GPU infrastructure for real-time AI inference and applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cerebrium free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency; Jaeger tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- They diverge on capability: Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Jaeger covers Distributed trace search.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cerebrium and Jaeger actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cloud).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cerebrium
- Ultra-fast cold starts
- Elastic scaling
- Bring your own code
- Multi-region failover
- WebSocket and streaming
- Asynchronous jobs
- CI/CD with gradual rollouts
- OpenTelemetry integration
Only in Jaeger
- Distributed trace search
- Dependency graph
- Adaptive sampling
- Pluggable storage
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cerebrium
- Deploying voice agents and conversational AI applicationsnot Jaeger
- Video and image model serving with low latencynot Jaeger
- LLM inference and completion endpointsnot Jaeger
- Real-time embeddings and vector database operationsnot Jaeger
- Distributed model training with hyperparameter sweepsnot Jaeger
Jaeger
- Finding which service in a request path causes the latencynot Cerebrium
- Understanding real service dependencies rather than the diagram on the wikinot Cerebrium
- Debugging failures that only appear under production traffic patternsnot Cerebrium
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cerebrium
- Free Hobby tier limited to 3 apps and 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard plan at $100/month required for production deployments
- Per-second compute pricing requires continuous cost monitoring
- Storage costs add up for large model files
Jaeger
- Tracing is only as good as the instrumentation, and partial instrumentation produces misleading gaps
- Storage is the real operational cost: high-volume tracing on Elasticsearch or Cassandra is a cluster to run and pay for
- Traces alone, without correlated metrics and logs, leave you switching between tools during an incident
Pricing, plan by plan
Cerebrium
Free- HobbyFree
- 3 user seats
- Up to 3 deployed apps
- 5 GPU concurrency
- Standard$100/month
- Unlimited seats and apps
- 30 GPU concurrency
- Custom domains
- Enterprise$undefined/custom
- Unlimited resources
- Volume discounts
- Dedicated support
- GPU Compute$undefined/per-second
- T4: $0.000164/s
- H100: $0.00167/s
Jaeger
Free- JaegerFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Cerebrium if
- You need ultra-fast cold starts.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, Docker.
- You also want elastic scaling.
Choose Jaeger if
- You need distributed trace search.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- You also want dependency graph.
Questions people ask
- Is Cerebrium or Jaeger better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cerebrium starts at Free and Jaeger at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cerebrium or Jaeger?
- Cerebrium starts at Free and Jaeger at Free.
- Does Cerebrium or Jaeger run on more platforms?
- Cerebrium runs on Cloud, Docker. Jaeger runs on Linux, Kubernetes, Docker.
- Can I use Cerebrium for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cerebrium best used for?
- Cerebrium is most often used for deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications, video and image model serving with low latency, llm inference and completion endpoints, real-time embeddings and vector database operations. Of those, deploying voice agents and conversational ai applications and video and image model serving with low latency are not what Jaeger is typically brought in for.
- What can Cerebrium do that Jaeger cannot?
- Cerebrium covers Ultra-fast cold starts, Elastic scaling, Bring your own code, Multi-region failover. Jaeger covers Distributed trace search, Dependency graph, Adaptive sampling, Pluggable storage.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Cerebrium: Is Cerebrium only for inference or can it train models?
Cerebrium supports both inference serving and model training with hyperparameter sweeps. It enables deployment of voice agents, LLMs, video models, and other AI applications.
SourceJaeger: Is Jaeger free?
Yes, open source and CNCF-graduated. Costs are the storage backend you run.
Cerebrium: How do the cold starts compare to other platforms?
Cerebrium achieves 2-4 second cold starts through memory and GPU snapshotting, significantly faster than traditional 30+ second cold boots. This is competitive with platforms like Beam Cloud.
SourceJaeger: Do I use Jaeger or OpenTelemetry?
Both, usually. Instrument with OpenTelemetry and use Jaeger to store and query the traces.
Cerebrium: What compliance certifications does Cerebrium have?
Cerebrium maintains SOC 2 Type II compliance, HIPAA certification, GDPR compliance, and ISO certification. It provides gVisor container isolation and configurable data residency for regulated workloads.
SourceJaeger: Does Jaeger handle metrics and logs?
No. It is a tracing system. Metrics and logs need Prometheus, Loki or an equivalent.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Cerebrium vs Beam Cloud
- Cerebrium vs Lambda
- Cerebrium vs Anyscale
- Cerebrium vs Koyeb
- Cerebrium vs Deno Deploy
- Cerebrium vs Serverless Framework
- Cerebrium vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Cerebrium vs Upstash
- Cerebrium vs Neon
- Cerebrium vs Fireworks AI
- Cerebrium vs Porter
- Cerebrium vs Fastly
- Cerebrium vs Flux
- Cerebrium vs Google Cloud Platform
- Cerebrium vs HAProxy
- Cerebrium vs IBM Cloud
- Cerebrium vs kind
- Cerebrium vs Zipkin
- Cerebrium vs Grafana Cloud
- Cerebrium vs VictoriaMetrics
- Cerebrium vs Proxmox VE
- Cerebrium vs Rancher
- Cerebrium vs OpenEBS
- Cerebrium vs DeepInfra
- Cerebrium vs Go
- Cerebrium vs Packer
- Cerebrium vs Caddy
- Cerebrium vs K3s
- Jaeger vs Beam Cloud
- Jaeger vs Lambda
- Jaeger vs Anyscale
- Jaeger vs Koyeb
- Jaeger vs Deno Deploy
- Jaeger vs Serverless Framework
- Jaeger vs Lambda (AWS Serverless)
- Jaeger vs Upstash
- Jaeger vs Neon
- Jaeger vs Fireworks AI
- Jaeger vs Porter
- Jaeger vs Fastly
- Jaeger vs Flux
- Jaeger vs Google Cloud Platform
- Jaeger vs HAProxy
- Jaeger vs IBM Cloud
- Jaeger vs kind
- Jaeger vs Zipkin
- Jaeger vs Grafana Cloud
- Jaeger vs VictoriaMetrics
- Jaeger vs Proxmox VE
- Jaeger vs Rancher
- Jaeger vs OpenEBS
- Jaeger vs DeepInfra
- Jaeger vs Go
- Jaeger vs Packer
- Jaeger vs Caddy
- Jaeger vs K3s

