Softwr

Insurance · head to head

Insurity Suite vs Ivans

Insurity Suite logo

Insurity Suite

Insurance

End-to-end insurance software for modern carriers

From
On request
Rated
-
Ivans logo

Ivans

Insurance

Carrier to agency data exchange infrastructure that sits under most US insurance agency management systems

From
On request
Rated
-

The short version

  • Each has a real cost: Insurity Suite subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing; Ivans applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
  • They diverge on capability: Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management, Ivans covers Ivans Download.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Insurity Suite and Ivans actually diverge.

Attributes where Insurity Suite and Ivans differ
AttributeInsurity SuiteIvans
Pricing modelsubscriptionquote
PlatformsWeb, Api, MobileWeb
Founded2015Unknown

Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Insurity Suite

  • Policy lifecycle management
  • Claims automation
  • Billing and payments
  • Document management
  • Underwriting workbench
  • Reinsurance management
  • Regulatory compliance
  • Analytics dashboard

Only in Ivans

  • Ivans Download
  • Ivans Exchange
  • Ivans Distribution
  • Market Appetite
  • Download analytics for carriers
  • Commission download

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Insurity Suite

  • Policy administrationnot Ivans
  • Claims processingnot Ivans
  • Digital transformationnot Ivans
  • Legacy modernizationnot Ivans

Ivans

  • An agency evaluating a new management system that needs to confirm, carrier by carrier and line by line, which data will actually download before it signsnot Insurity Suite
  • A carrier launching a new line that wants agency systems to receive policy data automatically rather than by rekeying from a portalnot Insurity Suite
  • An MGA that wants its book visible to retail agencies in the same download flow as admitted carriersnot Insurity Suite
  • An agency operations lead auditing why commission reconciliation keeps failing, which usually turns out to be a missing or misconfigured download connectionnot Insurity Suite

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Insurity Suite

  • Subscription pricing based on modules and users with no transparent public pricing
  • Requires significant implementation and configuration to launch new products
  • Targeted primarily at MGAs and specialty carriers, not small independent agents

Ivans

  • Applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
  • Download coverage is decided by carriers, not by Ivans or your AMS, so a carrier that does not publish a line simply does not download it and no amount of configuration in your system will fix it.
  • Eligibility requires that you are appointed and writing the line in that state, meaning newly appointed agencies wait on carrier-side setup with little visibility into where the request sits.
  • Data quality varies sharply by carrier, and agencies routinely find that some carriers send incomplete or oddly mapped policy data that then has to be cleaned inside the AMS, undermining the point of automating it.
  • Pricing is opaque and largely invisible to agencies because it is bundled into AMS and carrier agreements, which makes it impossible to judge what the network actually costs your business or to negotiate it.

Pricing, plan by plan

Insurity Suite

On request
  • Core$undefined/month
    • Policy administration
    • Claims processing
    • Billing management
  • Enterprise$undefined/month
    • All Core features
    • Advanced analytics
    • Custom integrations

Ivans

On request
  • Ivans$undefined/year
    • Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional charge, with a possible fee for Citizens of Florida business
    • Carrier and MGA participation, Ivans Distribution and appetite products are quoted
    • Pricing is generally embedded in the agency management system or carrier agreement rather than billed separately to the agency

Which should you pick?

Choose Insurity Suite if

  • You need policy lifecycle management.
  • You work on Web, Api, Mobile.
  • You also want claims automation.

Choose Ivans if

  • You need ivans download.
  • You also want ivans exchange.

Questions people ask

Is Insurity Suite or Ivans better?
Neither clearly leads. Insurity Suite starts at On request and Ivans at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Insurity Suite or Ivans?
Insurity Suite starts at On request and Ivans at On request.
Does Insurity Suite or Ivans run on more platforms?
Insurity Suite runs on Web, Api, Mobile. Ivans runs on Web.
What is Insurity Suite best used for?
Insurity Suite is most often used for policy administration, claims processing, digital transformation, legacy modernization. Of those, policy administration and claims processing are not what Ivans is typically brought in for.
What can Insurity Suite do that Ivans cannot?
Insurity Suite covers Policy lifecycle management, Claims automation, Billing and payments, Document management. Ivans covers Ivans Download, Ivans Exchange, Ivans Distribution, Market Appetite.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Insurity Suite: What does Insurity Pro Suite provide?

Insurity Pro Suite is a modular core platform for growing carriers and MGAs, providing enterprise-grade policy administration, integrated billing and accounting, and end-to-end claims management. It supports 20+ commercial and personal lines, E&S, and Lloyd's products.

Source
Ivans: Do agencies pay for Ivans?

Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional cost, with a noted exception for business written with Citizens of Florida. The economics sit with carriers and with the agency management system vendors.

Insurity Suite: What is Insurity's Sure Personal Suite?

Insurity Sure Personal Suite provides cost-effective policy, billing, and claims solutions specifically designed for personal lines property and casualty carriers.

Source
Ivans: Why is a carrier not downloading?

Almost always eligibility or carrier-side publication: you must be appointed and writing that line in that state, and the carrier must publish that line for download. Check the connection status in Ivans Exchange first.

Insurity Suite: Does Insurity use AI for underwriting?

Yes. Insurity Pro Suite includes an AI-powered risk assistant that identifies profitable submissions through risk scoring, evaluates submission data using artificial intelligence, and provides instant profitability scores to prioritize high-value risks.

Source
Ivans: Is Ivans owned by Applied Systems?

Yes. That matters because Applied also sells Applied Epic and EZLynx, so a competing AMS depends on infrastructure run by a competitor.

Insurity Suite: What claims processing speed does Insurity deliver?

Insurity enables digital claims payments that issue claim settlements in under thirty seconds via integrated ACH, virtual cards, or real-time payment processing rails.

Source
Ivans: Can you switch AMS and keep your downloads?

Connections have to be re-pointed to the new system, which is a per-carrier request through Ivans Exchange and is a common source of migration delay.

Insurity Suite: Does Insurity offer workflow configuration without coding?

Yes. Insurity provides workflow configuration that allows business users to modify underwriting and claims workflows through a visual interface without requiring software code or IT involvement.

Source
Share

Related pages

Other head to heads