Insurance · head to head
Embroker vs Ivans

Ivans
Insurance
Carrier to agency data exchange infrastructure that sits under most US insurance agency management systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Embroker no pricing published on website; requires completing an application and underwriting process; Ivans applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- They diverge on capability: Embroker covers Benefits management, Ivans covers Ivans Download.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Embroker and Ivans actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Embroker
- Benefits management
- Policy administration
- Employee portal
- Analytics and reporting
- Claims management
- Mobile app
- Compliance tools
- Integration support
Only in Ivans
- Ivans Download
- Ivans Exchange
- Ivans Distribution
- Market Appetite
- Download analytics for carriers
- Commission download
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Embroker
- Employee benefits managementnot Ivans
Ivans
- An agency evaluating a new management system that needs to confirm, carrier by carrier and line by line, which data will actually download before it signsnot Embroker
- A carrier launching a new line that wants agency systems to receive policy data automatically rather than by rekeying from a portalnot Embroker
- An MGA that wants its book visible to retail agencies in the same download flow as admitted carriersnot Embroker
- An agency operations lead auditing why commission reconciliation keeps failing, which usually turns out to be a missing or misconfigured download connectionnot Embroker
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Embroker
- No pricing published on website; requires completing an application and underwriting process
- Pricing varies by state and is subject to application approval
Ivans
- Applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- Download coverage is decided by carriers, not by Ivans or your AMS, so a carrier that does not publish a line simply does not download it and no amount of configuration in your system will fix it.
- Eligibility requires that you are appointed and writing the line in that state, meaning newly appointed agencies wait on carrier-side setup with little visibility into where the request sits.
- Data quality varies sharply by carrier, and agencies routinely find that some carriers send incomplete or oddly mapped policy data that then has to be cleaned inside the AMS, undermining the point of automating it.
- Pricing is opaque and largely invisible to agencies because it is bundled into AMS and carrier agreements, which makes it impossible to judge what the network actually costs your business or to negotiate it.
Pricing, plan by plan
Embroker
On request- Professional$undefined/month
- Benefits management
- Policy administration
- Employee portal
Ivans
On request- Ivans$undefined/year
- Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional charge, with a possible fee for Citizens of Florida business
- Carrier and MGA participation, Ivans Distribution and appetite products are quoted
- Pricing is generally embedded in the agency management system or carrier agreement rather than billed separately to the agency
Which should you pick?
Choose Embroker if
- You need benefits management.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want policy administration.
Questions people ask
- Is Embroker or Ivans better?
- Neither clearly leads. Embroker starts at On request and Ivans at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Embroker or Ivans?
- Embroker starts at On request and Ivans at On request.
- Does Embroker or Ivans run on more platforms?
- Embroker runs on Web, Ios, Android. Ivans runs on Web.
- What is Embroker best used for?
- Embroker is most often used for employee benefits management. Of those, employee benefits management is not what Ivans is typically brought in for.
- What can Embroker do that Ivans cannot?
- Embroker covers Benefits management, Policy administration, Employee portal, Analytics and reporting. Ivans covers Ivans Download, Ivans Exchange, Ivans Distribution, Market Appetite.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Embroker: How much does Embroker insurance cost?
Embroker does not publish pricing. The vendor emphasizes 'custom quotes in minutes' and positions themselves as offering 'transparent solutions.' Customers must click 'Get a Quote' to access the application portal. Services and pricing vary by state and are subject to application and underwriting requirements.
SourceIvans: Do agencies pay for Ivans?
Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional cost, with a noted exception for business written with Citizens of Florida. The economics sit with carriers and with the agency management system vendors.
Embroker: How can you request a quote from Embroker?
Click the 'Get a Quote' button to access their application portal, or contact Embroker at 1.844.436.2765 (Mon-Fri) or use their contact form.
SourceIvans: Why is a carrier not downloading?
Almost always eligibility or carrier-side publication: you must be appointed and writing that line in that state, and the carrier must publish that line for download. Check the connection status in Ivans Exchange first.
Ivans: Is Ivans owned by Applied Systems?
Yes. That matters because Applied also sells Applied Epic and EZLynx, so a competing AMS depends on infrastructure run by a competitor.
Ivans: Can you switch AMS and keep your downloads?
Connections have to be re-pointed to the new system, which is a per-carrier request through Ivans Exchange and is a common source of migration delay.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Embroker vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Embroker vs Duck Creek
- Embroker vs Duck Creek Policy
- Embroker vs Applied Epic
- Embroker vs Origami Risk
- Embroker vs Insurity Suite
- Embroker vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Embroker vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Embroker vs ClaimVantage
- Embroker vs FRISS
- Embroker vs Insureon
- Embroker vs Jenesis Software
- Embroker vs Kin Insurance
- Embroker vs Ladder
- Embroker vs Metromile
- Embroker vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Embroker vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Embroker vs Tarmika
- Embroker vs InsurancePro
- Embroker vs NowCerts
- Embroker vs Socotra
- Embroker vs QQCatalyst
- Embroker vs HawkSoft
- Embroker vs Majesco
- Embroker vs FINEOS
- Embroker vs Five Sigma
- Embroker vs Haven Life
- Embroker vs Hippo
- Ivans vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Ivans vs Duck Creek
- Ivans vs Duck Creek Policy
- Ivans vs Applied Epic
- Ivans vs Origami Risk
- Ivans vs Insurity Suite
- Ivans vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Ivans vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Ivans vs ClaimVantage
- Ivans vs FRISS
- Ivans vs Insureon
- Ivans vs Jenesis Software
- Ivans vs Kin Insurance
- Ivans vs Ladder
- Ivans vs Metromile
- Ivans vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Ivans vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Ivans vs Tarmika
- Ivans vs InsurancePro
- Ivans vs NowCerts
- Ivans vs Socotra
- Ivans vs QQCatalyst
- Ivans vs HawkSoft
- Ivans vs Majesco
- Ivans vs FINEOS
- Ivans vs Five Sigma
- Ivans vs Haven Life
- Ivans vs Hippo

