Insurance · head to head
HawkSoft vs Ivans

Ivans
Insurance
Carrier to agency data exchange infrastructure that sits under most US insurance agency management systems
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: HawkSoft no pricing published on website; customers must contact sales; Ivans applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- They diverge on capability: HawkSoft covers Policy management, Ivans covers Ivans Download.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which HawkSoft and Ivans actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Insurance).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in HawkSoft
- Policy management
- Client database
- Document management
- Integrated accounting
- Commission tracking
- Email integration
- Task management
- Reporting
Only in Ivans
- Ivans Download
- Ivans Exchange
- Ivans Distribution
- Market Appetite
- Download analytics for carriers
- Commission download
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
HawkSoft
- Agency managementnot Ivans
- Policy servicingnot Ivans
- Client managementnot Ivans
- Accountingnot Ivans
- Commission trackingnot Ivans
Ivans
- An agency evaluating a new management system that needs to confirm, carrier by carrier and line by line, which data will actually download before it signsnot HawkSoft
- A carrier launching a new line that wants agency systems to receive policy data automatically rather than by rekeying from a portalnot HawkSoft
- An MGA that wants its book visible to retail agencies in the same download flow as admitted carriersnot HawkSoft
- An agency operations lead auditing why commission reconciliation keeps failing, which usually turns out to be a missing or misconfigured download connectionnot HawkSoft
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
HawkSoft
- No pricing published on website; customers must contact sales
Ivans
- Applied Systems owns both Ivans and competing agency management systems, so the neutral infrastructure that every AMS depends on is controlled by one of the AMS vendors, a conflict that rival vendors have complained about for years.
- Download coverage is decided by carriers, not by Ivans or your AMS, so a carrier that does not publish a line simply does not download it and no amount of configuration in your system will fix it.
- Eligibility requires that you are appointed and writing the line in that state, meaning newly appointed agencies wait on carrier-side setup with little visibility into where the request sits.
- Data quality varies sharply by carrier, and agencies routinely find that some carriers send incomplete or oddly mapped policy data that then has to be cleaned inside the AMS, undermining the point of automating it.
- Pricing is opaque and largely invisible to agencies because it is bundled into AMS and carrier agreements, which makes it impossible to judge what the network actually costs your business or to negotiate it.
Pricing, plan by plan
HawkSoft
$199/month- HawkSoft CMS$199/month
- Policy management
- Client management
- Document storage
- HawkSoft Plus$349/month
- All CMS features
- Integrated accounting
- Commission tracking
Ivans
On request- Ivans$undefined/year
- Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional charge, with a possible fee for Citizens of Florida business
- Carrier and MGA participation, Ivans Distribution and appetite products are quoted
- Pricing is generally embedded in the agency management system or carrier agreement rather than billed separately to the agency
Which should you pick?
Choose HawkSoft if
- You need policy management.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want client database.
Questions people ask
- Is HawkSoft or Ivans better?
- Neither clearly leads. HawkSoft starts at $199/month and Ivans at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, HawkSoft or Ivans?
- HawkSoft starts at $199/month and Ivans at On request.
- Does HawkSoft or Ivans run on more platforms?
- HawkSoft runs on Windows, Web. Ivans runs on Web.
- What is HawkSoft best used for?
- HawkSoft is most often used for agency management, policy servicing, client management, accounting. Of those, agency management and policy servicing are not what Ivans is typically brought in for.
- What can HawkSoft do that Ivans cannot?
- HawkSoft covers Policy management, Client database, Document management, Integrated accounting. Ivans covers Ivans Download, Ivans Exchange, Ivans Distribution, Market Appetite.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
HawkSoft: How much does HawkSoft cost?
HawkSoft does not publish pricing on its website. Prospective customers must contact the sales team at (866) 884-4680 (Option 4) or [email protected] to obtain a quote.
SourceIvans: Do agencies pay for Ivans?
Ivans Exchange is provided to agencies at no additional cost, with a noted exception for business written with Citizens of Florida. The economics sit with carriers and with the agency management system vendors.
Ivans: Why is a carrier not downloading?
Almost always eligibility or carrier-side publication: you must be appointed and writing that line in that state, and the carrier must publish that line for download. Check the connection status in Ivans Exchange first.
Ivans: Is Ivans owned by Applied Systems?
Yes. That matters because Applied also sells Applied Epic and EZLynx, so a competing AMS depends on infrastructure run by a competitor.
Ivans: Can you switch AMS and keep your downloads?
Connections have to be re-pointed to the new system, which is a per-carrier request through Ivans Exchange and is a common source of migration delay.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- HawkSoft vs InsurancePro
- HawkSoft vs NowCerts
- HawkSoft vs Duck Creek
- HawkSoft vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- HawkSoft vs Duck Creek Policy
- HawkSoft vs Jenesis Software
- HawkSoft vs QQCatalyst
- HawkSoft vs EZLynx
- HawkSoft vs Applied Epic
- HawkSoft vs AgencyBloc
- HawkSoft vs Better Agency
- HawkSoft vs Insurity Suite
- HawkSoft vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- HawkSoft vs Riskonnect
- HawkSoft vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- HawkSoft vs Snapsheet Claims
- HawkSoft vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- HawkSoft vs Vertafore AMS360
- HawkSoft vs Tarmika
- HawkSoft vs Socotra
- HawkSoft vs Majesco
- HawkSoft vs Embroker
- HawkSoft vs FINEOS
- HawkSoft vs Five Sigma
- HawkSoft vs FRISS
- HawkSoft vs Haven Life
- HawkSoft vs Hippo
- HawkSoft vs Guidewire PolicyCenter
- Ivans vs InsurancePro
- Ivans vs NowCerts
- Ivans vs Duck Creek
- Ivans vs Guidewire ClaimCenter
- Ivans vs Duck Creek Policy
- Ivans vs Jenesis Software
- Ivans vs QQCatalyst
- Ivans vs EZLynx
- Ivans vs Applied Epic
- Ivans vs AgencyBloc
- Ivans vs Better Agency
- Ivans vs Insurity Suite
- Ivans vs Majesco Policy for L&A
- Ivans vs Riskonnect
- Ivans vs Sapiens CoreSuite
- Ivans vs Snapsheet Claims
- Ivans vs Guidewire InsuranceNow
- Ivans vs Vertafore AMS360
- Ivans vs Tarmika
- Ivans vs Socotra
- Ivans vs Majesco
- Ivans vs Embroker
- Ivans vs FINEOS
- Ivans vs Five Sigma
- Ivans vs FRISS
- Ivans vs Haven Life
- Ivans vs Hippo
- Ivans vs Guidewire PolicyCenter

