Veterinary · head to head
ImproMed vs Kareo Clinical
ImproMed
Veterinary
On-premise Windows practice management with deep inventory and financial reporting, now inside Covetrus
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Kareo Clinical
Healthcare
Specialized EHR and practice management for independent and small practices
- From
- $89/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ImproMed it is a server-based Windows product, so the practice owns the hardware, the SQL database, the patching and the backup regime, and those costs never appear in the software quotation.; Kareo Clinical kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- They diverge on capability: ImproMed covers Multi-location inventory, Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ImproMed and Kareo Clinical actually diverge.
| Attribute | ImproMed | Kareo Clinical |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $89/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Windows | Web, Mobile |
| Category | Veterinary | Healthcare |
| Founded | Unknown | 2010 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ImproMed
- Multi-location inventory
- Production reporting
- Wellness plans
- Laboratory and imaging integration
- On-premise deployment
- Covetrus prescription management
Only in Kareo Clinical
- Electronic Health Records
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Medical Billing
- ePrescribing
- Analytics
- Labs
- Pharmacies
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ImproMed
- A multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparisonnot Kareo Clinical
- A practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledgernot Kareo Clinical
- A hospital in an area with unreliable internet that will not put the appointment book and records on a cloud connectionnot Kareo Clinical
- A small group running wellness plans that need recurring billing and compliance tracking against patientsnot Kareo Clinical
Kareo Clinical
- Practice management, scheduling and billing for independent medical practicesnot ImproMed
- Electronic health records and e-prescribing for small clinicsnot ImproMed
- Insurance claim submission and patient payment collectionnot ImproMed
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ImproMed
- It is a server-based Windows product, so the practice owns the hardware, the SQL database, the patching and the backup regime, and those costs never appear in the software quotation.
- Covetrus markets Pulse as its strategic cloud platform while holding three legacy practice management systems, so ask directly what development ImproMed still receives and get the support commitment and end-of-life notice period in writing.
- Remote and mobile access is weak compared with cloud systems, which matters for on-call work, home record review and multi-site groups sharing patients.
- The interface is dense and dated, and training a new receptionist or technician on it takes materially longer than on a modern cloud system.
- If Covetrus does steer customers to Pulse, the migration is a full data conversion with retraining, so the cost of the eventual move should be priced into the decision now rather than later.
Kareo Clinical
- Kareo is now part of Tebra and sold under the Tebra brand rather than as a standalone product
- Tebra publishes no rate: pricing varies with provider count, features and implementation requirements and is quoted during a demo
- Billing counts clinical providers such as MDs, DOs, NPs and PAs, so adding a prescriber raises the bill even though non clinical staff are free
- Electronic prescribing of controlled substances setup costs about $75 per provider as a one time fee
- PDMP integration costs $500 one time per facility plus about $50 per user per year
Pricing, plan by plan
ImproMed
On request- ImproMed Infinity$undefined/year
- Quoted per practice with a licence and an annual support agreement
- Server hardware and database licensing are the responsibility of the practice
- Data conversion and training charged separately
Kareo Clinical
$89/month- Clinical Starter$89/month
- EHR
- Scheduling
- Patient Portal
- Clinical Plus$189/month
- Everything in Starter
- Billing
- Analytics
Which should you pick?
Choose ImproMed if
- You need multi-location inventory.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want production reporting.
Choose Kareo Clinical if
- You need electronic health records.
- You work on Web, Mobile.
- You also want scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is ImproMed or Kareo Clinical better?
- Neither clearly leads. ImproMed starts at On request and Kareo Clinical at $89/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ImproMed or Kareo Clinical?
- ImproMed starts at On request and Kareo Clinical at $89/month.
- Does ImproMed or Kareo Clinical run on more platforms?
- ImproMed runs on Windows. Kareo Clinical runs on Web, Mobile.
- What is ImproMed best used for?
- ImproMed is most often used for a multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparison, a practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledger, a hospital in an area with unreliable internet that will not put the appointment book and records on a cloud connection, a small group running wellness plans that need recurring billing and compliance tracking against patients. Of those, a multi-doctor hospital carrying significant inventory value that needs reorder points and vendor price comparison and a practice manager who has to analyse production by veterinary surgeon and reconcile it against the general ledger are not what Kareo Clinical is typically brought in for.
- What can ImproMed do that Kareo Clinical cannot?
- ImproMed covers Multi-location inventory, Production reporting, Wellness plans, Laboratory and imaging integration. Kareo Clinical covers Electronic Health Records, Scheduling, Patient Portal, Medical Billing.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ImproMed: Is ImproMed still being developed?
Ask Covetrus for a release history and a written support commitment. Pulse is the stated strategic cloud product, and ImproMed, AVImark and RxWorks are all legacy systems in the same portfolio.
Kareo Clinical: How much does Kareo Clinical (now Tebra) cost?
Kareo Clinical pricing is not published publicly. Pricing is based on the number of clinical providers in your practice, not seat licenses. Setup includes optional EPCS at $75/provider and PDMP Integration at $500 one-time per facility plus $50/user/year.
SourceImproMed: Can it run in the cloud?
It is designed for an on-premise server. Hosting it on a remote desktop service is possible but it is not a native cloud application and does not behave like one.
Kareo Clinical: Does Tebra charge for front desk staff and medical assistants?
No. Tebra provides unlimited non-clinical staff access at no extra cost. Front desk staff, medical assistants, billers, and office admins can all access scheduling, charting, and claims modules without increasing billing.
SourceImproMed: What is it better at than cloud alternatives?
Inventory control and financial and production reporting. Practices with high stock value and several veterinary surgeons are the ones that notice the difference.
Kareo Clinical: Are there reduced rates for low-volume practices on Tebra?
Yes. Practices with providers billing under 100 claims monthly receive lower-tier pricing for those low-volume providers.
SourceImproMed: What happens to my data if we move to Pulse?
A conversion project. Establish before signing what Covetrus will convert, what it will not, and who pays for it.
Related pages
More on Kareo Clinical
Other head to heads
- ImproMed vs ezyVet
- ImproMed vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- ImproMed vs Animana
- ImproMed vs Onward Vet
- ImproMed vs VIA Veterinary
- ImproMed vs Provet Cloud
- ImproMed vs Instinct Science
- ImproMed vs Talkatoo
- ImproMed vs Shepherd
- ImproMed vs Digitail
- ImproMed vs PetDesk
- ImproMed vs VetBadger
- ImproMed vs IDEXX Neo
- ImproMed vs Vet Radar
- ImproMed vs Athenahealth
- ImproMed vs TheraNest
- ImproMed vs Epic Systems
- ImproMed vs Cerner
- ImproMed vs Amwell
- ImproMed vs Practice Fusion
- ImproMed vs DrChrono
- ImproMed vs NextGen Healthcare
- ImproMed vs WebPT
- ImproMed vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- ImproMed vs ChiroTouch
- ImproMed vs eClinicalWorks
- ImproMed vs Rx30
- ImproMed vs Aidoc
- ImproMed vs Annalise.ai
- ImproMed vs Doctor on Demand
- ImproMed vs Doxy.me
- ImproMed vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Kareo Clinical vs ezyVet
- Kareo Clinical vs IDEXX Cornerstone
- Kareo Clinical vs Animana
- Kareo Clinical vs Onward Vet
- Kareo Clinical vs VIA Veterinary
- Kareo Clinical vs Provet Cloud
- Kareo Clinical vs Instinct Science
- Kareo Clinical vs Talkatoo
- Kareo Clinical vs Shepherd
- Kareo Clinical vs Digitail
- Kareo Clinical vs PetDesk
- Kareo Clinical vs VetBadger
- Kareo Clinical vs IDEXX Neo
- Kareo Clinical vs Vet Radar
- Kareo Clinical vs Athenahealth
- Kareo Clinical vs TheraNest
- Kareo Clinical vs Epic Systems
- Kareo Clinical vs Cerner
- Kareo Clinical vs Amwell
- Kareo Clinical vs Practice Fusion
- Kareo Clinical vs DrChrono
- Kareo Clinical vs NextGen Healthcare
- Kareo Clinical vs WebPT
- Kareo Clinical vs Allscripts TouchWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs ChiroTouch
- Kareo Clinical vs eClinicalWorks
- Kareo Clinical vs Rx30
- Kareo Clinical vs Aidoc
- Kareo Clinical vs Annalise.ai
- Kareo Clinical vs Doctor on Demand
- Kareo Clinical vs Doxy.me
- Kareo Clinical vs Fujifilm Synapse
